Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zeroconf-safe tx replacement (replace-for-fee)

2013-11-04 Thread Adam Back
Might leak less wiggle room and be simpler/more robut to validate that *everything* has to be the same except for the amount going to one (presumed change) address. A privacy leak I know, but dont do that - ie send enough change the first time. And network analysis has shown change addresses

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zeroconf-safe tx replacement (replace-for-fee)

2013-11-04 Thread Peter Todd
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:10:38PM +0100, Adam Back wrote: Might leak less wiggle room and be simpler/more robut to validate that *everything* has to be the same except for the amount going to one (presumed change) address. A privacy leak I know, but dont do that - ie send enough change the