BLFS Version 6.2.0 has been released!

2007-02-14 Thread Randy McMurchy
It is with great pride that the BLFS team announces the release of BLFS Version 6.2.0. This release is the complement to the LFS 6.2 book. It has been almost 18 months since the last release of BLFS and many new packages and instructions have been added. For a summary of some of the changes, along

Re: Consolidated Tickets in Trac

2007-02-14 Thread Ag. Hatzimanikas
On Wed, Feb 14, at 07:08 Matthew Burgess wrote: > > There's an open ticket for Trac regarding ticket dependencies and the like. > I > haven't looked into how much they've managed to implement yet or timescales > for filling in the missing pieces but you can see it for yourself at > http://tra

Re: Consolidated Tickets in Trac

2007-02-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 19:07, Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, at 09:42 Tushar Teredesai wrote: > > On 2/14/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What I would expect (at least in the future), from a bug-tracking > > > technology is some kind of sub-tickets/threads. >

Re: Consolidated Tickets in Trac

2007-02-14 Thread Ag. Hatzimanikas
On Wed, Feb 14, at 09:42 Tushar Teredesai wrote: > On 2/14/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I would expect (at least in the future), from a bug-tracking technology > > is some kind of sub-tickets/threads. > > They are called meta bugs in mozilla's bugzilla. See >

Re: BLFS-6.2.0

2007-02-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 2/14/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/14/07 12:19 CST: > > I can't think of anything else that's > > been brought up in the past few days that would need addressing before > > BLFS-6.2.0. > > Great! Thanks for all the help, Dan. > > > What's

Re: BLFS-6.2.0

2007-02-14 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/14/07 12:19 CST: > I can handle the second and third in the next hour. Can you handle > expect since you reported it? Yes. > I can't think of anything else that's > been brought up in the past few days that would need addressing before > BLFS-6.2.0. Great!

Re: BLFS-6.2.0

2007-02-14 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/14/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The flurry of activity the last couple of days has been great. However, > I've sort of lost track where we stand. Is the 6.2 branch ready for release? > Are all the Trac tickets sorted out? Almost. There's two left in the milestone for 6.2.

BLFS-6.2.0

2007-02-14 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, The flurry of activity the last couple of days has been great. However, I've sort of lost track where we stand. Is the 6.2 branch ready for release? Are all the Trac tickets sorted out? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable

Re: Consolidated Tickets in Trac

2007-02-14 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 2/14/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I would expect (at least in the future), from a bug-tracking technology > is some kind of sub-tickets/threads. They are called meta bugs in mozilla's bugzilla. See for an example of

Re: Consolidated Tickets in Trac

2007-02-14 Thread Ag. Hatzimanikas
On Wed, Feb 14, at 12:45 Randy McMurchy wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry to be a stick-in-the-mud, and perhaps it's just me, but I don't > like this "lump everything in one ticket" idea (using the BLFS-6.2.0 > Text Changes ticket as an example). I find it difficult (if not > impossible) to figure out: >