atech.
> There is native
> IPv6 around here... somewhere
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> SKYPE: davetaht
> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
> http://the-edge.blogspot.com
>
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@l
g list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
>
>
>
> _______
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
On Jan 1, 2013 6:50 PM, "Michael Richardson" wrote:
>
>
> A comment was made a month ago or so about how long it takes wifi APs
> to switch from transmitting (unicast) to one station to another. That
> there was quite a large latency here, and that this was one reason that
> the AP designers want
cy here, and that this was one reason
that
> > the AP designers wanted large buffers to accmulate, so that the
> > switching time could be amortized over a larger number of packets.
>
> Pedro Tumusok replied
> > I might be way of here, but to me this sounds like a
stpath or what the vendor decided to name the feature.
Pedro
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
ers whinging about speedtest not
> > showing 100/30mbit. Of course user education is 'too hard' .
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
they can actually deliver this, I will try to fund it - ping me
> >>> off-list.)
> >>> I also think a better job can be done explaining buffer bloat - it¹s
> >>> hard
> >>> to make an Œelevator pitch¹ about it.
> >>>
> >>> It reminds me a bit of IPv6 several years ago. Rather than saying in
> >>> essence Œyou operators are dummies¹ for not already fixing this, maybe
> >>> assume the engineers all Œget it¹ and what to do it. Because we really
> >>> do
> >>> get it and want to do something about it. Then ask those operators what
> >>> they need to convince their leadership and their suppliers and product
> >>> managers and whomever else that it needs to be resourced more
> >>> effectively
> >>> (see above for example).
> >>>
> >>> We¹re at least part of the way there in DOCSIS networks. It is in D3.1
> >>> by
> >>> default, and we¹re starting trials now. And probably within 18-24
> months
> >>> we won¹t buy any DOCSIS CPE that is not 3.1.
> >>>
> >>> The question for me is how and when to address it in DOCSIS 3.0.
> >>>
> >>> - Jason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> >
> > ___
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Jonathan Morton
wrote:
>
> > On 29 Mar, 2015, at 20:36, Pedro Tumusok
> wrote:
> >
> > Dslreports got a new speedtester up, anybody know Justin or some of the
> other people over there?
> >
> > http://www.dslreports.com/s
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Morton
wrote:
>
> > On 30 Mar, 2015, at 16:56, Pedro Tumusok
> wrote:
> >
> > Also would you mind doing another test and share the link for result, so
> he can check closer?
>
> I still have the result link for
ome web page benchmarker) more or less built in...
> measuring actual network performance under load is not much of a
> reach.
>
>
Dave,
That is feature creep, we originally discussed having continuous ping
measurement under load.
New ideas not so welcome ;)
--
Best regards
with residential.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Pedro Tumusok
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Morton
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 30 Mar, 2015, at 16:56, Pedro Tumusok
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Also would you mind doing another te
Justin,
If you got any questions, don't feel shy :)
If there is any testing I can help with etc, let me know.
Pedro
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:05:19 +0200 Pedro Tumusok
> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > That is fe
I managed to remove a "t" on the end there
Pedro
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Pedro Tumusok
Date: Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS
3+ recommendation?)
To: jb
Cc: bloat
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Rich Brown wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> >
> > We had/have a lot of this problem in netperf-wrapper - a lot of data
> > tends to accumulate at the end of the test(s) and pollute the last few
> > data points in bloated scenarios. You
he dslreports test:
>>> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/538990
>>>
>>> But the upside? load is practically nil. The WRT1900AC, with it's
>>> dual-core processor is more than enough to keep up with this (from a load
>>> point of view), but it seems like the bottleneck isn't the raw CPU power
>>> (cache?).
>>>
>>> I'll get a writeup with graphs on the blog tomorrow (I hope).
>>>
>>> -Aaron
>>>
>>>
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
type setup and was wondering if going to these models would
> result in any mor effective airtime. It sounds like the answer is no.
>
> David Lang
>
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2015, Pedro Tumusok wrote:
>
> Is the 1900AC MU-Mimo? If not then its still normal Airtime limitations,
, 2015 at 10:26 PM, David Lang wrote:
> I'm not sure what the difference bwtwen mimo and mu-mimo is, pointer
> please?
>
>
> David Lang
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2015, Pedro Tumusok wrote:
>
> From my understanding you need an AP that supports mu-mimo and then you
>>
oat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
game development studios
2. Somebody to go and do a demo, shake hands and talk with them. Video, I
assume would be less effective.
If this something we should try, I can help out with the first point, but
the second one probably needs local bufferbloat evangelists.
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
_
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>>
>
>
> --
> David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
> System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
> dav...@spamcop.net
also, caching dhcp
> responses per ssid, so when you reconnect it tries a renew. There's
> doc on how they do that somewhere.
>
>
Wha about iOS devices, does it do the same tricks?
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
t; >> happy for me to include in my talk, please include.
> >
> >
> > I am still waiting for a decently priced 10GE switch. I can get 1GE
> 24port
> > managed ones, fanless, for 100-200USD. As soon as I go 10GE, price jumps
> up
> > a lot, and I get fans. The NICs aren't widely available, even though
> they're
> > not the biggest problem. My in-house cabling can do 10GE, but I guess
> I'm an
> > outlier.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
Pauling
wrote:
> Bingo; that's definitely step one - gateways capable of 10gbit
> becoming the norm.
>
> On 4 December 2017 at 23:43, Pedro Tumusok
> wrote:
> > For in home or even SMB, I doubt that 10G to the user PC is the main use
> > case.
> > Its having
ad/acceleration hw in there.
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
--
Best regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
Only thing i know that uses vpp + dpdk is TNSR.
https://www.netgate.com/tnsr
Not sure about som in that.
Pedro
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 16:18 Dave Taht, wrote:
> discovered via:
>
> https://twitter.com/awlnx/status/1491785956944351232
>
> I last paid attention to these technologies, 5 years ago
26 matches
Mail list logo
