I do not know how this could be generalized for all apps. In the
simple
cases -- maybe. Consider the following scenarios that you would
need to
handle:
* Change happens, the updated data affects the next 5 actions (via
the
current user or another user(s)) and then the user requests an
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 11:21:56PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> > User visits page A.
> > User visits page B in another tab.
> > User submits form A.
> > User submits form B.
> > A updates the flash.
> > B updates the flash.
> > Page A2 loads with whatever flash won.
> > Page B2 loads with whatever
* Jonathan T. Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-28 02:35]:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:57:01AM -0700, Mesdaq, Ali wrote:
> > Are you sure that InnoDB would solve this issue? Even if just
> > a row was locked and you have 2 inserts at the exact same
> > time how would that resolve the issue?
>
Matthieu Codron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/28/2007 11:22:36 AM:
>
> Le 28 juil. 07 à 14:05, Matt S Trout a écrit :
> >
> >>
> >> I like more the idea of a generic undo request. This could be part of
> >> a plugin providing this action and the necessary infrastructure to
> >> implement the
Le 28 juil. 07 à 14:05, Matt S Trout a écrit :
I like more the idea of a generic undo request. This could be part of
a plugin providing this action and the necessary infrastructure to
implement the "un-doing" of the action.
I fail entirely to see why this should be a plugin rather than part
Am 28.07.2007 um 10:12 schrieb Jonathan T. Rockway:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:15:36AM +0200, Tobias Kremer wrote:
I think you're right: The error is due to my poor-man's approach of
load-testing.
BTW, how are you invoking ab? I think each request should get its own
cookie, which means the
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 01:00:14PM +0200, Matthieu Codron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 26 juil. 07 à 08:55, Bill Moseley a écrit :
>
> >There's a recent article titled "Never Use a Warning When you Mean
> >Undo" at http://alistapart.com/articles/neveruseawarning.
> >
> >I'm wondering about the implementat
Hi,
Le 26 juil. 07 à 08:55, Bill Moseley a écrit :
There's a recent article titled "Never Use a Warning When you Mean
Undo" at http://alistapart.com/articles/neveruseawarning.
I'm wondering about the implementation.
I read that too. Interesting, but from what I see undo is not so easy
to
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:15:36AM +0200, Tobias Kremer wrote:
> I think you're right: The error is due to my poor-man's approach of
> load-testing.
BTW, how are you invoking ab? I think each request should get its own
cookie, which means the same id shouldn't be being inserted more than
once.
Am 28.07.2007 um 02:26 schrieb Jonathan T. Rockway:
This adds a lot of complexity, though. Is this really a problem that
your users experience, or is it an artifact of poor load testing
practices?
I think you're right: The error is due to my poor-man's approach of
load-testing.
I believe th
10 matches
Mail list logo
