I worked for the FutureNet division of Data I/O in the late 1980s. One
disastrous product was a UNIX based coprocessor system that plugged into an IBM
PC/AT. The idea was to run circuit board layout software and simulation on a
PC. This would be less expensive than the Daisy, Mentor, or Valid wo
>william degnan wrote:
Prior to the DEC Rainbow, Chrislin Industries was marketing the 11/23 with
vt103 as a desktop computer. This is a 3rd party vendor. Maybe they were
on to something...
Back around 1988, one of my customers had a few VT103
systems with just an RX02 for storage. A 3rd p
Byte Jan 1981 page 204 refers to an IBM S-100 microcomputer system IBM
demoed in Europe. Anyone here seen this machine or heard about it?
Bill Degnan
twitter: billdeg
vintagecomputer.net
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Jerome H. Fine wrote:
>>william degnan wrote:
>> Prior to the DEC Rainbow, Chrislin Industries was marketing the 11/23 with
>> vt103 as a desktop computer. This is a 3rd party vendor. Maybe they
>> were on to something...
>>
> Back around 1988, one of my custome
On 2016-04-21 8:49 PM, william degnan wrote:
Byte Jan 1981 page 204 refers to an IBM S-100 microcomputer system IBM
demoed in Europe. Anyone here seen this machine or heard about it?
Bill Degnan
twitter: billdeg
vintagecomputer.net
Interesting I had never heard of that , but there prediction wa
Nothing I ever heard of and I was in IBM Boca at the time and would have heard
*something* about it.
TTFN - Guy
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 4:49 PM, william degnan wrote:
>
> Byte Jan 1981 page 204 refers to an IBM S-100 microcomputer system IBM
> demoed in Europe. Anyone here seen this machine or h
>
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:08:56 -0400
> From: Toby Thain
> Subject: Re: High performance coprocessor boards of the 80s and 90s -
> was Re: SGI ONYX
>
> On 2016-04-20 8:02 PM, Michael Thompson wrote:
> >
> > I have a quad-860 VME board for Sun systems in my collection.
> >
>
> Do you ha
Prior to the DEC Rainbow, Chrislin Industries was marketing the 11/23 with
vt103 as a desktop computer. This is a 3rd party vendor. Maybe they were
on to something...
Bill Degnan
twitter: billdeg
vintagecomputer.net
I do know that the Wait signal was used by the Fluke 90 tester so it could be
clamped on top of an in circuit Z80 and run memory and I/O tests while the CPU
was doing its regular operations.
On vacation so haven't easy access to the operators manual for the Fluke 90
though...
John :-#)#
> On
On 04/21/2016 12:36 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
A friend building a Z80 system asked me about whether the Z80 /WAIT
signal has any effect during machine cycles that aren't
memory/IO/intack cycles (i.e., neither /MREQ and /IORQ asserted). The
user manual only describes the use of /WAIT for adding wait s
And to reply to my own mail: The issue was an improperly installed TU80
controller (it wasn't me!). The NPG jumper was not removed from the
backplane when the card was installed.
So: Double-check your grants, even when testing something seemingly
unrelated, like your cache. Lesson learned.
Hey all --
I resolved the weird failure I was seeing on my 11/750 with the Cache/TB
diagnostic and since it was fairly random I thought I'd share it to save
people from the future (hi, people from the future!) from going through
the same machinations I did.
Issue: ECKAL diagnostic loads, pr
On Thursday, April 21, 2016, Tony Aiuto wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:45 PM, John Willis >
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > That's another thing I remember and miss from those days... your
> > average
> > > > ISP would provide NNTP and UNIX shell accounts, as well as a few megs
> > of
> > > > space
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:45 PM, John Willis
wrote:
> >
> > > That's another thing I remember and miss from those days... your
> average
> > > ISP would provide NNTP and UNIX shell accounts, as well as a few megs
> of
> > > space to put up a personal web site in ~/public_html.
> >
> > I still rea
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 7:33 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
> ...
>> Neat. PLATO made extensive use of ECS, swapping per-terminal state
>> and programs in and out of ECS for fast interactive service. ECS was
>> also where most I/O buffers went, with PPUs doing disk and terminal
>> I/O from/to ECS rath
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Rich Alderson
> wrote:
>
> From: Paul Koning
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:48 AM
>
>> I don't think there are any Cyber 70 (CDC 6000 series) systems still
>> running, but there's one in emulation, running PLATO. See cyber1.org.
>> It even has emulated cons
On 04/21/2016 01:36 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>> On Apr 21, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>>
>> ... Ten was a number that figured into various aspects. The clock
>> was nomially 10 MHz;
>
> In serial numbers 1-7 only nominally -- the clock was a ring
> oscillator, tuned by tweaking wire
On 4/21/16 12:38 PM, Kyle Owen wrote:
> I'd be happy to dump the microcode/PROMs when I get some time, perhaps over
> the summer.
>
> Kyle
>
thanks. I just saw the panels, so I'll pull them out for pics
On 2016-04-21 7:29 PM, Dave Wade wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Guy
Sotomayor
Sent: 21 April 2016 22:39
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: High performance coprocessor boards of the 80s and 90s -
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Swift Griggs wrote:
>
>
> Thanks a lot for taking the time to explain that.
>
That’s why we’re here! ;-)
Thanks for listening!
TTFN - Guy
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Guy
> Sotomayor
> Sent: 21 April 2016 22:39
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: High performance coprocessor boards of the 80s and 90s - was Re:
> SGI ONYX
>
>
> >
Have you tried the #c-64 channel on ircnet? It's fairly well-populated,
with a lot of knowledgeable folks and demo-scene types around. I'm sure
someone there can assist you with the specifics.
I for one have never involved myself in the SD / IEC stuff. I seem to do
just fine with emulators and PC-
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Guy Sotomayor wrote:
> 3270 terminals are what are termed CUT terminals (can?t remember what the
> acronym means) but were connected to a controller via coax.
Ah okay. Someone told me that the voltage on those was enough to feel/shock
you. Was that true, or just a myth ?
> T
On 2016-04-21 6:53 PM, Swift Griggs wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Paul Berger wrote:
No the 3270 PC and 3270 AT where a special configuration for 3270 terminal
emulation it conatined a special keyboard with more keys that the normal
keyboard and connected to a special adapter card in the system.
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:53 PM, Swift Griggs wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Paul Berger wrote:
>> No the 3270 PC and 3270 AT where a special configuration for 3270 terminal
>> emulation it conatined a special keyboard with more keys that the normal
>> keyboard and connected to a special adapter
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:44 PM, Paul Berger wrote:
>
>
>
> There was definitely a XT/370 and likely an AT/370 as well the processor on
> the the 370 card in these machines was rumoured to be a modified Motorola 68K
> with special microcode to execute 370 instructions. These machines ran a
>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Paul Berger wrote:
> No the 3270 PC and 3270 AT where a special configuration for 3270 terminal
> emulation it conatined a special keyboard with more keys that the normal
> keyboard and connected to a special adapter card in the system.
I never understood the dynamics of 3720
On 2016-04-21 6:35 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Ali wrote:
Actually, the first one was called XT/370 because it plugged into an
XT!
Then came AT/370. Those were obviously ISA boards. Then came some
variants that were microchannel. The final iterations were PCI bas
>
> I think you're thinking of the 3270 PC and 3270 AT, which was pretty
> much what you described here...
>
> - Josh
Josh,
So I am. Thanks for the clarification. BTW: for those wanting more info on the
AT/370 here is a good link to some IBM brochures -
http://typewritten.org/Articles/IBM/g
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Ali wrote:
>
>>> Actually, the first one was called XT/370 because it plugged into an
>>> XT!
>>> Then came AT/370. Those were obviously ISA boards. Then came some
>>> variants that were microchannel. The
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Ali wrote:
> > Actually, the first one was called XT/370 because it plugged into an
> > XT!
> > Then came AT/370. Those were obviously ISA boards. Then came some
> > variants that were microchannel. The final iterations were PCI based.
> >
>
> Guy,
>
> I am not
> Actually, the first one was called XT/370 because it plugged into an
> XT!
> Then came AT/370. Those were obviously ISA boards. Then came some
> variants that were microchannel. The final iterations were PCI based.
>
Guy,
I am not sure about the other systems but my understanding of the XT/
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Swift Griggs wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Guy Sotomayor wrote:
>> Let?s not also forget the various 370 and 390 co-processor boards that
>> could be put into PC?s at various times to allow one to turn the PC into a
>> small mainframe capable of running mainfr
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Noel Chiappa
wrote:
> > From: Josh Dersch
>
> > It's actually a SCSI device the size of a refrigerator.
>
> Given all the largish machines you have, you must have either i) a
> warehouse,
> or ii) a very large basement and a tolerant SO! :-)
>
> No
> From: Josh Dersch
> It's actually a SCSI device the size of a refrigerator.
Given all the largish machines you have, you must have either i) a warehouse,
or ii) a very large basement and a tolerant SO! :-)
Noel
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Guy Sotomayor wrote:
> Let?s not also forget the various 370 and 390 co-processor boards that
> could be put into PC?s at various times to allow one to turn the PC into a
> small mainframe capable of running mainframe software (including the OS).
I can't forget because I neve
From: Paul Koning
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:48 AM
> I don't think there are any Cyber 70 (CDC 6000 series) systems still
> running, but there's one in emulation, running PLATO. See cyber1.org.
> It even has emulated console tubes...
I can't speak to Cyber 70 systems, but the 6500 at LCM
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
> ...
> Ten was a number that figured into various aspects. The clock was
> nomially 10 MHz;
In serial numbers 1-7 only nominally -- the clock was a ring oscillator, tuned
by tweaking wire lengths. Starting with serial number 8, there's a c
There was also an 80286 coprocessor board for various VAXen.
Let’s not also forget the various 370 and 390 co-processor boards that could be
put into PC’s at various times to allow one to turn the PC into a small
mainframe
capable of running mainframe software (including the OS).
TTFN - Guy
> O
On 04/21/2016 11:04 AM, Rick Bensene wrote:
> I think that you were remembering the console of one of the Control
> Data 6000/Cyber-70 series computers that you may have seen somewhere.
> This series of Control Data machines were famous for their consoles
> with two large, round, green-phosphor mo
Would the Palantir 68K ISA OCR boards be considered as high-performance?
There was also, IIRC, a NSC 32016 board made by someone.
--Chuck
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Toby Thain
wrote:
> On 2016-04-20 11:10 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Ok, this one's from the 70s, and it's a large, external unit rather than
>> a single board, but I have a Floating Point Systems AP-120B, essentially
>> an array processor for fast floating
I used to have this thing called a MasPar MP-2. It hung from a Decstation
5000 IIRC. Had the whole system, but the PSU in the MasPar box went bad.
Sold it to someone in Florida IIRC.
--
Ethan O'Toole
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
>
> I have two front panels for a similar system.
>
Think you could take some pictures? The lone picture I have of the H800
isn't a close-up of the panel, and I'd very much like to see what it looks
like up close.
It is a 24-bit mini. Docs are o
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, John Willis wrote:
> I loved being able to do finger @host and then use talk to chat with other
> people.
Me, too! That was a great feature. I'd finger '@' some server that my
classmates used and then use talk or ytalk to figure out how to do our
homework etc... People who
I wonder if there are any Commodore people out here who could tell me what
practical differences would result from using a Gotek-type
flash-memory-based floppy emulator in place of the C1581's mechanism, vs.
using Jim Brain's uIEC-SD or similar.
I don't know if the thing would even work in a 1581
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Rick Bensene wrote:
>
> ...
> The machine was an all-transistor design, based on the CDC 6600
> processor. It was liquid cooled, and had a large cooler unit that sat
> with the machine that cooled the coolant (water) and circulated it
> through the chassis, venting
Well the first E-Mail I sent was from a Honeywell L66/60 running GCOS and
TSS sometime around 1985. Aberdeen University had written a "Greybook"
mailer in "B". Greybook was basically RFC822 e-mail with three
modifications: -
1. It used revered "big endian" names, so "uk.ac.nerc" as opposed to the
On 4/20/16 11:07 PM, Raymond Wiker wrote:
> I was a bit surprised to see that it used 2901 with a date code of 1985 -
> the 2901 was introduced 10 years before.
>
I designed a microcoded 12-bit graphics processor in 1985 using them. They
were the thing to use until CMOS bit-slices came out (ac
On 4/20/16 9:21 PM, Kyle Owen wrote:
> I seem to have acquired a few boards from a decommissioned system.
it also would be a good thing to dump proms/microcode from them.
On 4/20/16 9:21 PM, Kyle Owen wrote:
> I seem to have acquired a few boards from a decommissioned system. Don't
> know what I'll do with these for now, other than maybe hang them up for
> display purposes...unless someone has one, what else can one do?
>
I have two front panels for a similar sy
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Rich Alderson wrote:
> Yes, and if you'd actually paid attention to what they were teaching you,
> instead of whinging about commercial viability
Well, let's keep things non-personal and civil and agree to disagree. If
you knew me better, I doubt you'd say this. It'd just de
Mark J. Blair wrote:
> I also seem to remember an operator's console with two round CRTs on
it,
> but I might have fabricated that memory from whole cloth.
>
I think that you were remembering the console of one of the Control Data
6000/Cyber-70 series computers that you may have seen somewhere.
From: Swift Griggs
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 9:11 AM
> I'm not saying everything was perfect in the 80's or 90's. I mean, some CS
> professors in the 90's were teaching Oberon, LISP dialects, or Smalltalk.
Yes, and if you'd actually paid attention to what they were teaching you,
instead of
>
> > That's another thing I remember and miss from those days... your average
> > ISP would provide NNTP and UNIX shell accounts, as well as a few megs of
> > space to put up a personal web site in ~/public_html.
>
> I still read Usenet newsgroups via GNUS under Emacs on my shell account on
> Pani
>
> Yep. I miss that too. I used to run such an ISP in the 90's and we did
> exactly as you say. We also ran a finger servers everywhere (and no, not
> one with a bunch of security problems). People used to use that in cool
> ways, too (bots, cool services, vending machine interfaces, etc..).
>
From: John Willis
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 8:02 AM
> That's another thing I remember and miss from those days... your average
> ISP would provide NNTP and UNIX shell accounts, as well as a few megs of
> space to put up a personal web site in ~/public_html.
I still read Usenet newsgroups via
A friend building a Z80 system asked me about whether the Z80 /WAIT
signal has any effect during machine cycles that aren't
memory/IO/intack cycles (i.e., neither /MREQ and /IORQ asserted). The
user manual only describes the use of /WAIT for adding wait states, so
I expect it probably only affects
> I've never seen a Craigslist ad that talked about shipping. Really, it's
> local-only.
>
I’ve purchased quite a few computers from across the country via Craigslist.
Just be upfront with the seller and ask if they would be willing to ship. I
always specify “are you willing to drop this of
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:07:42AM -0400, et...@757.org wrote:
> Craigslist buyers and sellers can be FLAKY, and at same time you can meet
> some awesome people through it (through the buying and selling of stuff, not
> including all the personals stuff.)
That's my experience. Often people don't
> On 21 Apr 2016, at 14:43 , Mattis Lind wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Hey, this is useful.
>>> Thanks for doing it!
>>
>> Yep!
>> Already investigating. IMD gave me some trouble, had to resort to
>> dosbox. Source for PED (Programmer's Editor) version G? I've never
>> seen source. I have version F as a :P
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Rod Smallwood
wrote:
> Extreme Mailing
>
> What is the most unusual place you have sent mail from?
Lake Hoare, Dry Valleys, Antarctica, November, 1995, after I installed
a Ritron "radio phone" and a dialup modem at the Field Camp...
http://penguincentral.com/pic
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, John Willis wrote:
> I think I remember slirp... didn't that somewhat emulate a SLIP link
> through a shell account?
Yes. It was (and kinda still is) awesome. The coolest thing about it is
that, unlike using PPP or SLIP, you don't need valid IPs as endpoints.
Slirp was lik
On 04/21/2016 08:01 AM, John Willis wrote:
> That's another thing I remember and miss from those days... your
> average ISP would provide NNTP and UNIX shell accounts, as well as a
> few megs of space to put up a personal web site in ~/public_html.
In fact, that's what the Internet used to mean.
I have an associate that is working with a large Fortune500 company and is
having issues connecting his stuff to "legacy" technology there.
Apparently, a company called "Synergex" has a "screen scraper" type program
that presents a gui to a windows desktop user from a character based
applicatio
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 07:27, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> Thick mat of twisted pair wiring, and console with two round CRTs, that's a
> good description of a CDC 6000 series mainframe. They certainly weren't as
> easy to use as Unix machines, but a lot faster than anything else at the time
> they
Yes, it's geographically oriented. You can do wide area searches on another
site called searchtempest.com. I've never really found Craigslist very
appealing, personally.
There are services that let people set alerts and it will ping them on
their phone or something. Just post a desireable pin
>
> > It wouldn't be until 1994 that the university allowed access to the
> public
> > internet directly through SLIP or PPP.
>
> My college was very restrictive that way, too. I figured out how to get
> "slirp" working because there wasn't anyway to get a working PPP or SLIP
> connection for me f
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Swift Griggs wrote:
I haven't look at Craigslist much. Isn't it more oriented to
geographically local sales? Can you setup search alerts like on ebay?
Craigslist rocks, IMHO. I agree that Ebay is draconian and over-corporate.
However, I also agree with others that I've
On 04/21/2016 07:04 AM, Jules Richardson wrote:
On 04/20/2016 10:00 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
Nice collection. I'd forgotten about the 32016! What
software ran on these
respective processors?
OS-wise the 32016 ran something called Panos, with Pandora
as the firmware - mostly written in Modula-2.
> > I haven't look at Craigslist much. Isn't it more oriented to
> > geographically local sales? Can you setup search alerts like on ebay?
Craigslist rocks, IMHO. I agree that Ebay is draconian and over-corporate.
However, I also agree with others that I've found stuff on ebay I'd never
have h
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 11:33 PM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
>
> Back when I spent a couple of years at UNLV in the late 80s, I had a class in
> which I was forced to use an account on a Harris H800 computer, if my memory
> serves me correctly. Being a BSD snob, I felt that was a terrible imposition,
Yes, the mazewar source is saved. I demonstrated it running on my Imlac PDS-1
together with an emulated PDP10 (thanks to Ken Harrenstien) as well as an
emulated
PDS-1 (thanks to Howard Palmer) back in 2006 at a VCF West.
Best,
Tom Uban
On 4/20/16 7:25 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Josh
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, John Willis wrote:
> going from the terminal server and use a proper TN3270 client to access the
> mainframe instead of ProComm Plus.
Oh I remember Procomm, I was a Qmodem man, myself. However, niether had 3270
emulation.
> It wouldn't be until 1994 that the university allo
On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:46 PM, dwight wrote:
> The RTX-2000 was an of shoot of the NC4000. Even at 10MHz, they could
> out compute a 40MHz 80386.
> One execution per clock cycle plus possibly using 3 16 bit busses in a single
> cycle.
> A 4MHz NC4000 could sort 1K 16 bit values in 19.7 milliseconds
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 00:03, curiousma...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I haven't look at Craigslist much. Isn't it more oriented to geographically
> local sales? Can you setup search alerts like on ebay?
Yes, it's geographically oriented. You can do wide area searches on another
site called searchtemp
On 2016-04-20 14:00, Jarratt RMA wrote:
On 19 April 2016 at 19:29 Laurens Vets wrote:
On 2016-04-16 18:07, Glen Slick wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Robert Jarratt
wrote:
Anyone got the following document: DIGITAL Personal Workstation
System
Reference and Maintenance Guide
Only t
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:32:01 +0200
> From: Jonathan Katz
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>
> Subject: Re: strangest systems I've sent email from
>
> Using something like "dtmail" on a Sparc 10 in 2016 o
> >
> > Hey, this is useful.
> > Thanks for doing it!
>
> Yep!
> Already investigating. IMD gave me some trouble, had to resort to
> dosbox. Source for PED (Programmer's Editor) version G? I've never
> seen source. I have version F as a :PROG file. I'm guessing that Planc
> version C may compile it
On 21 April 2016 at 13:04, Jules Richardson
wrote:
> OS-wise the 32016 ran something called Panos, with Pandora as the firmware
> - mostly written in Modula-2. Acorn (working with Logica) attempted a
> Xenix port, and some documentation references Xenix as being available, but
> I don't think it
On 21 April 2016 at 13:22, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Mattis Lind wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of NORD-10 I put some scanned documents here:
>> http://www.datormuseum.se/documentation-software/norsk-data-documentation
>> and also a few diskettes that I have imaged:
>> h
On 04/20/2016 10:00 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
Nice collection. I'd forgotten about the 32016! What software ran on these
respective processors?
OS-wise the 32016 ran something called Panos, with Pandora as the firmware
- mostly written in Modula-2. Acorn (working with Logica) attempted a
Xenix p
On 04/20/2016 08:57 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
Also going to mention the BBC Tube coprocessor here. Which had an ARM
version, iirc.
Yes, from Acorn: ARM, 32016, 6502, 65C102, Z80, 80186 and 80286.
Torch did a couple of different Z80 boards too, and a couple of different
Z80/68000 combo boards.
C
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Mattis Lind wrote:
>
> Speaking of NORD-10 I put some scanned documents here:
> http://www.datormuseum.se/documentation-software/norsk-data-documentation
> and also a few diskettes that I have imaged:
> http://www.datormuseum.se/documentation-software/norsk-data-f
tor 2016-04-21 klockan 10:06 +0200 skrev Nico de Jong:
> - Oprindelig meddelelse -
> Fra: "Swift Griggs"
> Til: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>
> Sendt: 20. april 2016 18:55
> Emne: Re: strangest systems I've sent email from
>
>
> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Pontus Pi
> Almost :-)
> The NORD-10/S was a NORD-10 plus caching and paging, while the
> bitsliced version was to be called NORD-10/M (M for 'micro'), and was
> so fast that it was renamed NORD-100, which was shortened to ND-100
> later that same year (1978 - but the machine itself was released in
> 1979, s
- Oprindelig meddelelse -
Fra: "Swift Griggs"
Til: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Sendt: 20. april 2016 18:55
Emne: Re: strangest systems I've sent email from
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
>> For remote mailing I prefer i vt terminal and a microwav
I haven't look at Craigslist much. Isn't it more oriented to geographically
local sales? Can you setup search alerts like on ebay?
Marc
On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:36 AM, et...@757.org wrote:
> Craigslist is the one big eBay alternative.
88 matches
Mail list logo
