Re: [CentOS] Video capture on CentOS (6)

On 9/27/11, Mathieu Baudier wrote: >> Could anybody recommend a not-too-expensive video capture cards (PCI, >> USB, fireWire, ...) which would be well supported (drivers easily >> available in base, ElRepo, or not too complicated to build). > > Answering my own question for future reference: the G

Re: [CentOS] openvpn + bridge utils in CentOS 6

27.09.2011, 09:52, "唐建伟" : > Hi all, > > I just intalled openvpn + bridge in CentOS 6, but i get strange problems: > > the remote PCs cannot get the local PCs'  MACs and also, the local PCs > cannot get the remote PCs' MACs > > but when i run "brctl showmacs br0"  it will list all the MACs and al

[CentOS] Rsync CR repo for CentOS 6? was [CentOS-announce] CentOS-6.0 Continuous Release i386 and x86_64

> - Baseurl for the CR repo is set to only use centos.org internal >  machines, this is to reduce the amount of time we need to spend in >  seeding and then managing external mirrors. Is it possible to synchronize locally the CR repo? We usually synchronize all repositories in our internal networ

Re: [CentOS] Video capture on CentOS (6)

> Could anybody recommend a not-too-expensive video capture cards (PCI, > USB, fireWire, ...) which would be well supported (drivers easily > available in base, ElRepo, or not too complicated to build). Answering my own question for future reference: the GRABBY video capture card by TERRATEC worke

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

On Monday, September 26, 2011 10:16:14 PM Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 9/27/11, Benjamin Smith wrote: > > When booting a non-working system, it boots straight up to the boot > > prompt (runlevel 3) without issue, and everything works fine. When the > > machine sits idle for a period of time (r

[CentOS] openvpn + bridge utils in CentOS 6

Hi all, I just intalled openvpn + bridge in CentOS 6, but i get strange problems: the remote PCs cannot get the local PCs' MACs and also, the local PCs cannot get the remote PCs' MACs but when i run "brctl showmacs br0" it will list all the MACs and also " brctl show" will show that all the co

Re: [CentOS] RTL8111/8168B always 100mbps

On 9/27/11, Muhammad Panji wrote: > Dear All, > I have an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B NIC. from lspci -vv : > > 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. > RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) > > It is detected, but why the speed is always 100Mbps, a

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

On 9/27/11, Benjamin Smith wrote: > When booting a non-working system, it boots straight up to the boot prompt > (runlevel 3) without issue, and everything works fine. When the machine sits > idle for a period of time (ranging from 15 minutes or so and up) the HDD > becomes unreadable/unwritable a

Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm

>ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/fedora/linux/updates/testing/15/SRPMS/zoneminder >-1.24.4-3.fc15.src.rpm My bad, thought you had to modify the spec... There were some recent changes to a bz I was following that got resolved which got me thinking now that CentOS 6 is out I should get this done. __

[CentOS] RTL8111/8168B always 100mbps

Dear All, I have an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B NIC. from lspci -vv : 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) It is detected, but why the speed is always 100Mbps, already change cable but still no luck. I use et

Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 9:51 PM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm > > >http://palmettoshopper.com/zo

Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm

>http://palmettoshopper.com/zoneminder/zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm > >Ooops, link corrected. Sorry! That's on the end of one my last todo lists for a company I work for. I gave it a go a couple times but had hardware issues with the card I was using in CentOS 5. Care to post the srpm? Th

Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Dukes > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 9:40 PM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm > > For all interested, I have rebuilt the

[CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm

For all interested, I have rebuilt the src rpm for zoneminder-1.24.4, fedora 15. Its up and running on CentOS 6.0. Gonna have to d/l some files. Most of mine came from rpm.pbone.net The link is: http://palmettoshopper.com/zoneminder/zonminder-1.24-3.el6.x86_64.rpm Eddie

Re: [CentOS] Perl module installed via CPAN but its is not found

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of TE Dukes > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 8:06 PM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Perl module installed via CPAN but its > is not found > > > > > -Orig

Re: [CentOS] Perl module installed via CPAN but its is not found

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 7:50 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Perl module installed via CPAN but its > is not found > > on 9/26/2011 4:32 P

Re: [CentOS] x86_64.rpm v. i686.rpm

on 9/26/2011 4:36 PM TE Dukes spake the following: > Just curious why there are two types of rpms for some packages. Just got my > first 64 bit machine. Which should I be installing? Both? > > TIA > > Eddie Because a 64 bit machine can also run 32 bit programs. So the default seems to pull in seve

Re: [CentOS] Perl module installed via CPAN but its is not found

on 9/26/2011 4:32 PM TE Dukes spake the following: > Hello, > > I am trying to rebuild a zoneminder rpm. It calls for the module > perl(Sys::Mmap). I installed via CPAN but when I run rpmbuild --rebuild > zoneminder-xx, it tells me the above module is needed. > > Seems I ran into this once befo

Re: [CentOS] Sort logfiles on common lines?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 23:34, John R. Dennison wrote: > Actually you are 2 full point releases behind; current is 5.7.  I would > strongly suggest you update. > Thanks. I will mention that to the sysadmin. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com _

[CentOS] x86_64.rpm v. i686.rpm

Just curious why there are two types of rpms for some packages. Just got my first 64 bit machine. Which should I be installing? Both? TIA Eddie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Perl module installed via CPAN but its is not found

Hello, I am trying to rebuild a zoneminder rpm. It calls for the module perl(Sys::Mmap). I installed via CPAN but when I run rpmbuild --rebuild zoneminder-xx, it tells me the above module is needed. Seems I ran into this once before and fixed it, but I can't remember what I did. I have search

Re: [CentOS] Sort logfiles on common lines?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 22:43, John R Pierce wrote: > uniq can count occurances.  will require two sorts.  one to get all > similar errors adjacent, the other to sort by count order.   instead of > using field selects, lets just clip the timestamps off up front... > >   cut -c 17- | sort | uniq -c

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

On Sep 26, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > I'm trying to figure out why 2 machines have a "hard I/O lock" on the HDD > when > running EL6. > > I have 4 identical machines, all were stable with EL5. 2 work great with EL6, > 2 do not. I've checked momtherboard BIOS versions and setti

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Paras pradhan wrote: > Hi Lamar, > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: >> On Friday, September 23, 2011 04:29:39 PM Paras pradhan wrote: >>> This is a SAN drive mounted. I have checked with my storage >>> administrator if this has been re mapped or

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

--On Monday, September 26, 2011 03:13:09 PM -0700 Benjamin Smith wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately, these aren't ancient 686 systems, > they are 1-ish year old 8-core Intel Xeons with 32 GB of ECC RAM apiece. > I can't justify replacing them, especially since two of the four are >

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

on 9/26/2011 3:13 PM Benjamin Smith spake the following: > On Monday, September 26, 2011 02:42:18 PM Devin Reade wrote: >> --On Monday, September 26, 2011 12:11:47 PM -0700 Benjamin Smith >> Unfortunately in trying to use C6 on the old machine I wound up with >> far too many changed variables to fi

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

On Monday, September 26, 2011 02:42:18 PM Devin Reade wrote: > --On Monday, September 26, 2011 12:11:47 PM -0700 Benjamin Smith > Unfortunately in trying to use C6 on the old machine I wound up with > far too many changed variables to figure out where the problem was. > Despite that, my gut tells m

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

--On Monday, September 26, 2011 12:11:47 PM -0700 Benjamin Smith wrote: > I'm trying to figure out why 2 machines have a "hard I/O lock" on the HDD > when running EL6. I _won't_ chime in with a "check your ". Instead here's a potentially useless datapoint: I have an older but still usuable 3

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

On Monday, September 26, 2011 02:00:52 PM Brian McKerr wrote: > Have you checked the cables you are using ? There are none - it's a front-loaded hot-swap rackmount. The systems are stable under EL5. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is belie

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

On 09/26/2011 09:02 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Not sure what those do, but lsof should show what files are open, and 'strace -p process_id' would show the system calls issued by a process. >>> >>> Thanks, that might be usefull. I'ill just have to find a way to strace >>> multiple proces

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

Have you checked the cables you are using ? On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > On Monday, September 26, 2011 12:36:19 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > a) have you checked > > /var/log/message for memory or drive errors? > > Looked through the logs, there's *nothing* I can fin

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

On Monday, September 26, 2011 12:36:19 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > a) have you checked > /var/log/message for memory or drive errors? Looked through the logs, there's *nothing* I can find that's out of sorts. When the IO problem happens, nothing can be written. > Maybe memtest86? I replaced

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

Benjamin Smith wrote: > I'm trying to figure out why 2 machines have a "hard I/O lock" on the HDD > when > running EL6. > > I have 4 identical machines, all were stable with EL5. 2 work great with > EL6, 2 do not. I've checked momtherboard BIOS versions and settings, SAS > controller BIOS versions

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

Jeremy Sanders wrote: > Micky L Martin wrote: > >> No Jeremy, reformatting is nonsensical, like doing anything without >> finding cause of the problem is! >> You have to check out prelink if you still don't know about it, it can >> be something amazing or ridiculous. >> In my case, all evidence poi

Re: [CentOS] Firewalling outbound connections...

On 09/26/11 9:15 AM, John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > would anyone know a soft to firewall outbound connections (applications > phoning home, etc...). > It would detect an unknown (to him) app that tries to connect to the outside > world and it would popup a allow/deny request...AppArmor might be a bit

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Not sure what those do, but lsof should show what files are open, and 'strace -p process_id' would show the system calls issued by a process. >>> >>> Thanks, that might be usefull. I'ill just have to find a way to strace >>> multi

[CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

I'm trying to figure out why 2 machines have a "hard I/O lock" on the HDD when running EL6. I have 4 identical machines, all were stable with EL5. 2 work great with EL6, 2 do not. I've checked momtherboard BIOS versions and settings, SAS controller BIOS versions and settings, they are the same

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Micky L Martin wrote: > No Jeremy, reformatting is nonsensical, like doing anything without finding > cause of the problem is! > You have to check out prelink if you still don't know about it, it can be > something amazing or ridiculous. > In my case, all evidence

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

>>> Not sure what those do, but lsof should show what files are open, and >>> 'strace -p process_id' would show the system calls issued by a >>> process. >> >> Thanks, that might be usefull. I'ill just have to find a way to strace >> multiple process at once and find the usefull info among that loa

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

Micky L Martin wrote: > No Jeremy, reformatting is nonsensical, like doing anything without > finding cause of the problem is! > You have to check out prelink if you still don't know about it, it can be > something amazing or ridiculous. > In my case, all evidence points to prelink! Think you got

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: >>> I did used these utilities, while it can help see what processes are >>> generating IO, it doesn't show what files on the file system are being >>> asked >>> or waited for. >>> >>> Basicly, what I'm searching is an equivalent for fs_usage on

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

>> I did used these utilities, while it can help see what processes are >> generating IO, it doesn't show what files on the file system are being >> asked >> or waited for. >> >> Basicly, what I'm searching is an equivalent for fs_usage on Mac OS X, or >> tcpdump, but on a bloc device... > > Not s

Re: [CentOS] External Dial-up Modem

yeah, ttyS0. Graham Johnston Network Planner Westman Communications Group 204.717.2829 johnst...@westmancom.com think green; don't print this email. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Bill Campbell Sent: Monday, Septembe

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: >>> In the meen time, I'd still like to find a tool to know what files are >>> requeted to the filesystem and what ones are being waited for... >>> >> >> atop and iotop are tools that do that...when the kernel has been >> appropriately patched

Re: [CentOS] External Dial-up Modem

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Graham Johnston wrote: > I am having an issue with Centos 6 and an external USRobotics modem.  We > use the modem as part of a last resort SMS paging system. > > > > Across multiple Dell servers, different models, I can't not get the > modem to respond to simple A

Re: [CentOS] External Dial-up Modem

Graham Johnston wrote: > I am having an issue with Centos 6 and an external USRobotics modem. We > use the modem as part of a last resort SMS paging system. > > Across multiple Dell servers, different models, I can't not get the > modem to respond to simple AT commands while using Minicom. At the

Re: [CentOS] External Dial-up Modem

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011, Graham Johnston wrote: >I am having an issue with Centos 6 and an external USRobotics modem. We >use the modem as part of a last resort SMS paging system. > >Across multiple Dell servers, different models, I can't not get the >modem to respond to simple AT commands while usin

Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue

Theo Band wrote: > On 09/26/2011 01:02 PM, Jennifer Botten wrote: >> >> I am having an issue with someone accessing our server via a SIP/VOIP >> connection. I have changed my iptables rules to drop all UDP traffic >> from and too this IP address, but this traffic seems to still run >> through my se

Re: [CentOS] this is strange and dark

Le 26/09/2011 01:44, Johnny Hughes a écrit : > If he is complaining about 6.0CR ... we are getting close to releasing > many of those packages. Should be a bunch in the next 2 days. Then the > rest of the 6.1 updates to date couple of days after that. > > Of course, that assumes no issues. Hi Jo

[CentOS] External Dial-up Modem

I am having an issue with Centos 6 and an external USRobotics modem. We use the modem as part of a last resort SMS paging system. Across multiple Dell servers, different models, I can't not get the modem to respond to simple AT commands while using Minicom. At the same time if I connect the s

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

>> In the meen time, I'd still like to find a tool to know what files are >> requeted to the filesystem and what ones are being waited for... >> > > atop and iotop are tools that do that...when the kernel has been > appropriately patched or the kernel is of an appropriate version... I did used the

[CentOS] Firewalling outbound connections...

Hi, would anyone know a soft to firewall outbound connections (applications phoning home, etc...). It would detect an unknown (to him) app that tries to connect to the outside world and it would popup a allow/deny request...AppArmor might be a bit overkill... Anyone have any experience with Sys

Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue

On 09/26/2011 01:02 PM, Jennifer Botten wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am having an issue with someone accessing our server via a SIP/VOIP > connection. I have changed my iptables rules to drop all UDP traffic > from and too this IP address, but this traffic seems to still run > through my server. Thes

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

Paras pradhan wrote: > Here are some new additional info : > > My colleague mounted this LUN to a different host and we found the > same partitions over there too which is normal. > > I dd a 1st device to a file and opened the image file with bvi and > found some hosts name, VG name etc etc. in th

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

Hi Lamar, On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 04:29:39 PM Paras pradhan wrote: >> This is a SAN drive mounted. I have checked with my storage >> administrator if this has been re mapped or any similar events and he >> verified that nothing has happen

Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue

I would use an '-I' instead of '-A' if its a case of blocking an intruder. You can use tcpdump and 'ss -l' as well. Check out the application logs, try to see what's the intruder is up to! On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Jennifer Botten wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

No Jeremy, reformatting is nonsensical, like doing anything without finding cause of the problem is! You have to check out prelink if you still don't know about it, it can be something amazing or ridiculous. In my case, all evidence points to prelink! To the guys using prelink and having experien

Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Jennifer Botten wrote: > To: centos@centos.org > From: Jennifer Botten > Subject: [CentOS] Hacking Issue > > Hi, > > > > I am having an issue with someone accessing our server via a SIP/VOIP > connection. I have changed my iptables rules to drop all UDP traffic from > and to

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

Jeremy Sanders wrote: > Micky L Martin wrote: > >> Because rpm and rpmverify also seemed to have been modified so I cannot >> trust 'rpm -V' package verification. >> >> Already did lsof and process tracing but to no avail. Does anyone have >> any idea how to find that culprit? > > Are you sure it's

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

In our case, it was the driver. Google e1000e-1.6.2.tar.gz On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:56 AM, wrote: > Patrick Lists wrote: > > On 09/23/2011 12:54 PM, Volker Poplawski wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel > >> 82574L gigabit nics on Ce

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

Patrick Lists wrote: > On 09/23/2011 12:54 PM, Volker Poplawski wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel >> 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. > > I have also had problems with an Intel Gbit nic in a Dell Optiplex 760 > using the e1000 module. If it

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

On 26 September 2011 13:54, Patrick Lists wrote: > On 09/23/2011 12:54 PM, Volker Poplawski wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel >> 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. > > I have also had problems with an Intel Gbit nic in a Dell Optiplex 760 > u

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

On Monday, September 26, 2011 06:40 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > If it's not supported it shouldn't be enabled and easily (ab)used. This is > part of the reason you have to add a boot argument to get CentOS to do a > version upgrade; it's known to not work properly, and thus is semi-hidden. Now tha

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

So apparently prelink was running. I disabled it in /etc/sysconfig/prelink and ran 'prelink -ua' to undo the linking. I just stumbled upon a document (attached) describing how Linux used to have a.out and now the ELF. Though I never knew that prelink actually

Re: [CentOS] I can't connect to /dev/ttyS0

On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Michel Donais wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: Michel Donais > Subject: Re: [CentOS] I can't connect to /dev/ttyS0 > >> You first need to double-check that /dev/ttyS0 is actually >> the correct serial COM port you have the modem connected to. > >> Please look under

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

Jeremy Sanders wrote: Micky L Martin wrote: Because rpm and rpmverify also seemed to have been modified so I cannot trust 'rpm -V' package verification. Already did lsof and process tracing but to no avail. Does anyone have any idea how to find that culprit? Are you sure it's not pre

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

Micky L Martin wrote: > Because rpm and rpmverify also seemed to have been modified so I cannot > trust 'rpm -V' package verification. > > Already did lsof and process tracing but to no avail. Does anyone have any > idea how to find that culprit? Are you sure it's not prelink that's modifying th

[CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

For the binary experts. I have a situation here. Something hideously but continuously is modifying the /bin/ executables as common as coreutils and net-tools. I can verify that from md5sum. First thing I checked was 'ls' and it has a checksum mismatch. So I removed it and reinstalled it. Then I mo

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

On 09/23/2011 12:54 PM, Volker Poplawski wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel > 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. I have also had problems with an Intel Gbit nic in a Dell Optiplex 760 using the e1000 module. If it would come up it would come up

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

From: Volker Poplawski > I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel > 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. I had pbms with my Intel 1000e too. Installed elrepo's kmod-e1000e and so far so good... http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-e1000e JD __

Re: [CentOS] SSH in and my terminal keystrokes are weird.......

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Craig White wrote: > >> Depending on what you are doing, you might also like running freenx on >> the server and using the NX client from www.nomachine.com to have a >> full linux GUI desktop on the Mac - which works pretty well even if >> you just open terminal wi

Re: [CentOS] disk partitioning: 6.0 install to harddrive using liveCD

From: "cen...@trodman.com" > I'm planning to set up a test Centos 6.0 box (has CDROM, but no > DVD) with these partions: Why not use the netinstall or minimal CDs...? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

From: Paras pradhan > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: >> On 09/23/11 12:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Paras pradhan wrote: >  Number  Start   End     Size   File system  Name >      Flags >    1      17.4kB  134MB   134MB               Microsoft

Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue

On 09/26/2011 07:45 AM, Jennifer Botten wrote: > I am blocking UDP and TCP from that IP. I also have an OUTPUT rule however > mine has the -o eth0 as the -i eth0 does not work. Yes, I had it wrong. For the OUTPUT chain you use the -o ethX. Perhaps you have an ALLOW rule for udp or some other crit

Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Fábregas Sent: 26 September 2011 01:09 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue On 09/26/2011 07:02 AM, Jennifer Botten wrote: > -A INPUT -i eth0 -d 209.61.231.42 -p

Re: [CentOS] Hacking Issue

On 09/26/2011 07:02 AM, Jennifer Botten wrote: > -A INPUT -i eth0 -d 209.61.231.42 -p udp -j DROP This needs to be: -A OUTPUT -i eth0 -d 209.61.231.42 -p udp -j DROP ...if you want to drop packets initiated from your system to that ip...which doesn't make any sense if you're dropping all the inc

[CentOS] Hacking Issue

Hi, I am having an issue with someone accessing our server via a SIP/VOIP connection. I have changed my iptables rules to drop all UDP traffic from and too this IP address, but this traffic seems to still run through my server. These are the iptables rules that I current have on the server. -A

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

On Friday, September 23, 2011 04:29:39 PM Paras pradhan wrote: > This is a SAN drive mounted. I have checked with my storage > administrator if this has been re mapped or any similar events and he > verified that nothing has happened...(I trust him) May I ask what sort of SAN? Fibre Channel or iS

Re: [CentOS] Hello from RAQport Please remove this post

What a way to find problems... I would suggest submitting a bug report but seeing as how delayed you might me Alex with replying to a post made over 4 years, it would be a waste of time, because the bug is within your abilities to provide a response in a timely manner. I do not believe that even th

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

On Saturday, September 24, 2011 06:34:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote: > Ah...you're supposed to use do-release-upgrade and not 'apt dist-upgrade' If that is what is called by the gui distribution upgrade button, it has done similar things to a few installs I have had to repair. > Ubuntu ain't Debi

Re: [CentOS] SSH in and my terminal keystrokes are weird.......

On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 22:58 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd wrote: > > Craig, > >> > >> iTerm2 is a better solution (not perfect... just much better than > >> Terminal.app and fewer time spent in the penalty box for using Mac OS X. > > > > Thanks, this actually

Re: [CentOS] Hello from RAQport Please remove this post

On 26 September 2011 11:02, John Hodrien wrote: > I highly recommend raking up four year old poor feedback on your business, > it's a surefire way to get ahead of your competition. Considering that they only managed to complain about this after four years shows an interesting take on speedy respon

Re: [CentOS] Hello from RAQport Please remove this post

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Alex Bajan wrote: > Dear Centos, > > We did never receive the Server back from Australia > > And this forum is not to post incorrect disputes information from the users > regarding some other companies. > > Link below > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-Septembe

[CentOS] Hello from RAQport Please remove this post

Dear Centos, We did never receive the Server back from Australia And this forum is not to post incorrect disputes information from the users regarding some other companies. Link below http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html Sincerely Alex Lech Bajan Principal

Re: [CentOS] ssh reverse DNS failure

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I use dyndns's (free) service to access a remote machine > with a dynamic IP address. > The machine is running under CentOS-6.0. > > I can ssh into the address given me by dyndns (*.homelinux.com), > but when I do this I get the warning > "r