On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Dan Hyatt wrote:
> I have an intermittent problem with my Dell blades, out of 80 blades 69
> of them kickstarted Centos 6 fine using PXE
> The other 11, I get a c0t0 not found error (indicating it is not
> finding the local disk on the blade).
>
> I can remote
On 04/18/2014 05:32 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 04/17/2014 12:26 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 04/16/2014 11:05 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
when I tried dd if=/dev/sdf of=somefile count=100 i get:
somefile: x86 boot sector, Microsoft Windows XP MBR, Serial 0xc3072e18;
partition 1: ID=0x7, starthead
On 04/17/2014 11:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 11:46 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> On 04/17/2014 11:14 PM, neubyr wrote:
>>> When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result:
>>>
>>> # yum list installed openssl
>>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, t
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> > repoforge/rpmforge/Dag has been a fantastic resource for ages, but today
> > it's pretty much dead in the water despite some good people trying to
> > step in to help keep it afloat. Many thanks to Dag and others for those
> > many years of hard work, but I think
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 11:14 PM, neubyr wrote:
> > When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result:
> >
> > # yum list installed openssl
> > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify
On 04/17/2014 11:46 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 11:14 PM, neubyr wrote:
>> When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result:
>>
>> # yum list installed openssl
>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify, versionlock
>> Loading mirror speeds from ca
On 04/17/2014 11:14 PM, neubyr wrote:
> When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result:
>
> # yum list installed openssl
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify, versionlock
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> Installed Packages
> openssl.x86_64
> 1.0.1
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, wrote:
> neubyr wrote:
> > When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result:
> >
> > # yum list installed openssl
> > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify, versionlock
> > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> > Installed P
neubyr wrote:
> When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result:
>
> # yum list installed openssl
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify, versionlock
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> Installed Packages
> openssl.x86_64
> 1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4
> @updates/
When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result:
# yum list installed openssl
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify, versionlock
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Installed Packages
openssl.x86_64
1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4
@updates/$releasever
When I try to ins
On 17.04.2014 21:35, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
>> repoforge/rpmforge/Dag has been a fantastic resource for ages, but
>> today
>> it's pretty much dead in the water despite some good people trying to
>> step in to help keep it afloat. Many thanks to Dag and others for
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> repoforge/rpmforge/Dag has been a fantastic resource for ages, but today
> it's pretty much dead in the water despite some good people trying to
> step in to help keep it afloat. Many thanks to Dag and others for those
> many years of hard work, but I think it's time
Dan Hyatt wrote:
> I have an intermittent problem with my Dell blades, out of 80 blades 69
> of them kickstarted Centos 6 fine using PXE
> The other 11, I get a c0t0 not found error (indicating it is not
> finding the local disk on the blade).
> Since the kickstart file defines the disk as sda1
On 04/17/2014 07:50 PM, cen...@kcburns.com wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 05:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have
>> conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging.
>
> Does the use of yum priorities take care of this concern?
it helps a lot
I have an intermittent problem with my Dell blades, out of 80 blades 69
of them kickstarted Centos 6 fine using PXE
The other 11, I get a c0t0 not found error (indicating it is not
finding the local disk on the blade).
I can remote mount the iso image and do a basic install of centos on
thes
cen...@kcburns.com wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 05:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have
>> conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging.
>
> Does the use of yum priorities take care of this concern?
No. The problem is the way the packages
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Among the repos listed on
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I've been using
> LinuxTECH.NET for MP3, vlc, and related packages with success. Between
> EPEL and LinuxTECH.NET, I've been able to replace most of what I
>
On 04/16/2014 05:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have
> conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging.
Does the use of yum priorities take care of this concern?
Thanks,
Ken
___
CentOS mai
On 04/17/2014 12:26 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 11:05 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>>
>> when I tried dd if=/dev/sdf of=somefile count=100 i get:
>>
>> somefile: x86 boot sector, Microsoft Windows XP MBR, Serial 0xc3072e18;
>> partition 1: ID=0x7, starthead 0, startsector 8064, 15626368 sect
On 04/16/2014 11:05 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> when I tried dd if=/dev/sdf of=somefile count=100 i get:
>
> somefile: x86 boot sector, Microsoft Windows XP MBR, Serial 0xc3072e18;
> partition 1: ID=0x7, starthead 0, startsector 8064, 15626368 sectors, code
> offset 0xc0
>
> still not much wiser I'm
Chris wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 06:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
>> Among the repos listed on
>> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I've been using
>> LinuxTECH.NET for MP3, vlc, and related packages with success. Between
>> EPEL and LinuxTECH.NET, I've been able to replace most of w
On 04/17/2014 06:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Among the repos listed on
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I've been using
> LinuxTECH.NET for MP3, vlc, and related packages with success. Between
> EPEL and LinuxTECH.NET, I've been able to replace most of what I
> formerl
On 04/17/2014 09:10 AM, Chris wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 07:27 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> I will take that a step further. Do not use repoforge / rpmforge at
>> all. There are still major issues with updates from that repo. As in
>> "what updates?".
> Where do you get packages for multimedia, es
On 04/16/2014 07:27 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> I will take that a step further. Do not use repoforge / rpmforge at
> all. There are still major issues with updates from that repo. As in
> "what updates?".
Where do you get packages for multimedia, especially MP3, from?
--
Chris
The latest version of rkhunter is complaining about "suspicious file
types" in /dev/shm. Thing is, they're being created on the fly by R, and
then seem to be a random name (5d1f...), and I have zero expectation that
R will only create shm files beginning with those characters.
For those running rk
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
26 matches
Mail list logo
