I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
using sendmail.mc .
But I found postfix very complicated to setup last year.
(It's working fine now.)
I think "sane" people use exim nowadays.
On 2 November 2013 12:57, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
> I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
> I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
> usin
On 02/11/13 12:57, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
> I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
> I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
> using sendmail.mc .
> But I found postfix very complic
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> I asked why postfix was preferable, but didn't any convincing reply.
> The general response was along the lines that it was the "modern" way.
Sendmail was written back in the days of wooden computers and iron
programmers and uses a macro l
On 11/2/2013 8:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
> I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
> I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
> using sendmail.mc .
> But I found postfix very comp
when in doubt; use google mail. :)
On 2 November 2013 15:57, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> On 11/2/2013 8:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
>> I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
>> I don't recall having any difficu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timothy Murphy said the following on 02/11/2013 13:57:
> Having looked into postfix/amavis a little further, it seems to me to
> involve excessively complicated processes (at least for a simple home
> server) with email going along spaghetti-like rout
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:41:53AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >
> > I asked why postfix was preferable, but didn't any convincing reply.
> > The general response was along the lines that it was the "modern" way.
>
> Sendmail was written ba
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:58:33PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> I've accumulated a set of rules for the sendmail.mc file that do what
sendmail.mc ? Back in the day all we had (SunOS 4) was the cf files
that we had to mangle by hand :-)
--
rgds
Stephen
On 11/2/2013 1:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> sendmail.mc ? Back in the day all we had (SunOS 4) was the cf files
> that we had to mangle by hand
now that was some truly scary stuff.the .mc/m4 macro stuff was a
latecomer.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somew
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 04:43:59PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:58:33PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> > I've accumulated a set of rules for the sendmail.mc file that do what
>
> sendmail.mc ? Back in the day all we had (SunOS 4) was the cf files
> that we had to mangle b
Harold Pritchett writes:
>
> On 11/2/2013 8:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
> > I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
> > I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
> > using sendm
12 matches
Mail list logo
