I'm on quincy.
I had lots of problems with RGW getting stuck. Once I dedicated 1
single RGW on each side to do replication, my problems went away.
Having a cluster of RGW behind a load balancer seemed to be confusing
things.
I still have multiple RGW for user-facing load, but a single RGW
On 06/09/2024 10:27, Matthew Vernon wrote:
On 06/09/2024 08:08, Redouane Kachach wrote:
That makes sense. The ipv6 BUG can lead to the issue you described. In
the current implementation whenever a mgr failover takes place,
prometheus configuration (when using the monitoring stack deployed by
ly redeploy from time to time) that external
monitoring could be pointed at?
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
On 05/09/2024 15:03, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Hi,
On 05/09/2024 12:49, Redouane Kachach wrote:
The port 8765 is the "service discovery" (an internal server that runs in
the mgr... you can change the port by changing the
variable service_discovery_port of cephadm). Normally it is ope
).
Right; it wasn't running because I have an IPv6 deployment (that bug's
fixed in 18.2.4 - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63448).
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
g. an external Prometheus
scraper at the service discovery endpoint of any mgr and it would then
tell Prometheus where to scrape metrics from (i.e. the active mgr)?
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an ema
rometheus config file (under "./etc) and see if there are
irregularities there.
It's not, it's the mgr container (I've enabled the prometheus mgr
module, which makes an endpoint available from whence metrics can be
scraped, rather than the prometheus container which r
I can tell from the docs it should just get
started when you enable the prometheus endpoint (which does seem to be
working)...
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Hi,
On 03/09/2024 11:46, Eugen Block wrote:
Do you see the port definition in the unit.meta file?
Oddly:
"ports": [
9283,
8765,
8765,
8765,
8765
],
which doesn't look right...
Regards,
Mattew
___
ce
yment where it's
only listening on v4.
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
get the service discovery
endpoint working?
Thanks,
Matthew
[0]
https://docs.ceph.com/en/reef/cephadm/services/monitoring/#deploying-monitoring-without-cephadm
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email t
warning message in that case...
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
When trying to clean up multi-part files, I get the following error:
$ rclone backend cleanup s3:bucket-name
2024/07/04 02:42:19 ERROR : S3 bucket bucket-name: failed to remove
pending multipart upload for bucket "bucket-name" key
"0a424a15dee6fecb241130e9e4e49d99ed120f05/outputs/012149-0
On 24/06/2024 21:18, Matthew Vernon wrote:
2024-06-24T17:33:26.880065+00:00 moss-be2001 ceph-mgr[129346]: [rgw
ERROR root] Non-zero return from ['radosgw-admin', '-k',
'/var/lib/ceph/mgr/ceph-moss-be2001.qvwcaq/keyring', '-n',
'mgr.moss-be20
On 24/06/2024 20:49, Matthew Vernon wrote:
On 19/06/2024 19:45, Adam King wrote:
I think this is at least partially a code bug in the rgw module. Where
...the code path seems to have a bunch of places it might raise an
exception; are those likely to result in some entry in a log-file? I&#x
rking out what the problem is
quite challenging...
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
up the spec file, but it looks like the one in the
docs[0]. Can anyone point me in the right direction, please?
[if the underlying command emits anything useful, I can't find it in the
logs]
Thanks,
Matthew
[0] https://docs.ceph.com/en/reef/mgr/rgw/#realm-credentials-token
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
of the zonegroup (and thus control what hostname(s) the rgws are
expecting to serve)? Have I missed something, or do I need to set up the
realm/zonegroup/zone, extract the zonegroup json and edit hostnames by hand?
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users ma
of modules already, and the rgw one
is effectively one small python file, I think...
I'm using 18.2.2.
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
roy osd.35 ; echo $?
OSD(s) 35 are safe to destroy without reducing data durability.
0
I should have said - this is a reef 18.2.2 cluster, cephadm deployed.
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
emoved.
What did I do wrong? I don't much care about the OSD id (but obviously
it's neater to not just incrementally increase OSD numbers every time a
disk died), but I thought that telling ceph orch not to make new OSDs
then using ceph orch osd rm to zap the disk and NVME lv
hope it's at least useful as a
starter-for-ten:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/57633
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
quot; and similar for the others, but is
there a way to have what I want done by cephadm bootstrap?
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
work,
and vgdisplay on the vg that pvs tells me the nvme device is in shows 24
LVs...
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Hi,
On 20/05/2024 17:29, Anthony D'Atri wrote:
On May 20, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Matthew Vernon wrote:
This has left me with a single sad pg:
[WRN] PG_AVAILABILITY: Reduced data availability: 1 pg inactive
pg 1.0 is stuck inactive for 33m, current state unknown, last acting []
.mgr
thing to want to do with cephadm?
I'm running
ceph version 18.2.2 (531c0d11a1c5d39fbfe6aa8a521f023abf3bf3e2) reef (stable)
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Ds and away you went; how does one do this
in a cephadm cluster?
[I presume involves telling cephadm to download a new image for podman
to use and suchlike]
Would the process be smoother if we arranged to leave /var/lib/ceph
intact between reimages
We have had pgs get stuck in quincy (17.2.7). After changing to wpq,
no such problems were observed. We're using a replicated (x3) pool.
On 2024-05-02 10:02, Wesley Dillingham wrote:
In our case it was with a EC pool as well. I believe the PG state was
degraded+recovering / recovery_wait and
Hi,
I'm new to bucket policies. I'm trying to create a sub-user that has
only read-only access to all the buckets of the main user. I created
the below policy, I can't create or delete files, but I can still
create buckets using "rclone mkdir". Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
I'm using ceph
On 24/04/2024 13:43, Bailey Allison wrote:
A simple ceph-volume lvm activate should get all of the OSDs back up and
running once you install the proper packages/restore the ceph config
file/etc.,
What's the equivalent procedure in a cephadm-managed cluster?
Thanks,
Ma
Hi All,
So I've got a Ceph Reef Cluster (latest version) with a CephFS system set up
with a number of directories on it.
On a Laptop (running Rocky Linux (latest version)) I've used fstab to mount a
number of those directories - all good, everything works, happy happy joy joy!
:-)
However, wh
Hi All,
I'm looking for a bit of advice on the subject of this post. I've been "staring
at the trees so long I can't see the forest any more". :-)
Rocky Linux Client latest version.
Ceph Reef latest version.
I have read *all* the doco on the Ceph website.
I have created a pool (my_pool) and an
Thanks Eugen, you pointed me in the right direction :-)
Yes, the config files I mentioned were the ones in
`/var/lib/ceph/{FSID}/mgr.{MGR}/config` - I wasn't aware there were others
(well, I suspected their was, hence my Q).
The `global public-network` was (re-)set to the old subnet, while the
e to
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/start/get-involved/
which lacks the registration link.
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Hi,
How does one get an invite to the ceph-storage slack, please?
Thanks,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Glad to hear it all worked out for you!
From: nguyenvand...@baoviet.com.vn At: 02/26/24 05:32:32 UTC-5:00To:
ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: [Urgent] Ceph system Down, Ceph FS volume in
recovering
Dear Mr Eugen, Mr Matthew, Mr David, Mr Anthony
My System is UP.
Thank you so
Once recovery is underway way simply restarting the RGWs should be enough to
reset them and get your object store back up.
Bloomberg doesn’t use cephfs so hopefully David’s suggestions work or if anyone
else in the community can chip in for that part.
Sent from Bloomberg Professional for iPh
: nguyenvand...@baoviet.com.vn
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
At: 02/24/24 16:14:12 UTC
Thank you Matthew.
Im following guidance from Mr Anthony and now my recovery progress speed is
much faster.
I will update my case day by day.
Thank you so much
___
ceph-users mailing
Anthony is correct, this is what I was getting at as well when seeing your ceph
-s output. More details in the Ceph docs here if you want to understand the
details of why you need to balance your nodes.
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/rados/operations/monitoring-osd-pg/
But you need to get you
It looks like you have quite a few problems I’ll try and address them one by
one.
1) Looks like you had a bunch of crashes, from the ceph -s it looks like you
don’t have enough MDS daemons running for a quorum. So you’ll need to restart
the crashed containers.
2) It looks like you might have
Can you send sudo ceph -s and sudo ceph health detail
Sent from Bloomberg Professional for iPhone
- Original Message -
From: nguyenvand...@baoviet.com.vn
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
At: 02/23/24 20:27:53 UTC-05:00
Could you pls guide me more detail :( im very newbie in Ceph :(
_
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/acl-overview.html
From: asad.siddi...@rapidcompute.com At: 02/23/24 09:42:29 UTC-5:00To:
ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Issue with Setting Public/Private Permissions for Bucket
Hi Team,
I'm currently working with Ceph object stora
the
dashboard); there is a MR to fix just the dashboard issue which got
merged into main. I've opened a MR to backport that change to Reef:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55689
I don't know what the devs' plans are for dealing with the broader pyO3
issue, but I'll ask on
Chris,
Thanks for all the investigations you are doing here. We're on
quincy/debian11. Is there any working path at this point to
reef/debian12? Ideally I want to go in two steps. Upgrade ceph first
or upgrade debian first, then do the upgrade to the other one. Most of
our infra is already
3c3c6f96ffcf
[root@ceph1 ~]# ceph fs subvolume ls cephfs csvg
[
{
"name": "staff"
}
]
--
Sincerely,
Matthew Melendy
IT Services Specialist
CS System Services Group
FEC 3550, University of New Mexico
___
ceph-users mail
18.2.1
(whereas the reporter is still on 18.2.0)? i.e. one has to upgrade to
18.2.1 before this bug will be fixed and so the upgrade _to_ 18.2.1 is
still affected.
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send
ctation is that the next point release of Reef (due soon!) will
have Debian packages built as part of it.
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
It would be nice if the dashboard changes which are very big would
have been covered in the release notes, especially since they are not
really backwards compatible. (See my previous messages on this topic)
On 2023-10-30 10:50, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
We're happy to announce the 7th backport rel
We are still waiting on debian 12 support. Currently our ceph is
stuck on debian 11 due to lack of debian 12 releases.
On 2023-11-01 03:23, nessero karuzo wrote:
Hi to all ceph community. I have a question about Debian 12 support for ceph
17. I didn’t find repo for that release athttps://down
I just discovered that rook is tracking this here:
https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/13136
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 18:09, Matthew Booth wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 16:26, Matthew Booth wrote:
>
>> FYI I left rook as is and reverted to ceph 17.2.6 and the issue is
>> resolv
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 16:26, Matthew Booth wrote:
> FYI I left rook as is and reverted to ceph 17.2.6 and the issue is
> resolved.
>
> The code change was added by
> commit 2e52c029bc2b052bb96f4731c6bb00e30ed209be:
> ceph-volume: fix broken workaround for atari partitions
that regression.
Fixes: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62001
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux
(cherry picked from commit b3fd5b513176fb9ba1e6e0595ded4b41d401c68e)
It feels like a regression to me.
Matt
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 16:13, Matthew Booth wrote:
> Firstly I'm rolli
self.list(args)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_volume/decorators.py", line
16, in is_root
return func(*a, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ceph_volume/devices/raw/list.py",
line 122, in list
report = self.generate(args.device)
File &qu
king I had enough space.
Thanks!
Matt
>
> Regards,
> Eugen
>
> [1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/reef/cephadm/services/osd/#activate-existing-osds
>
> Zitat von Matthew Booth :
>
> > I have a 3 node ceph cluster in my home lab. One of the pools spans 3
> > hdds,
so I will most likely rebuild
it. I'm running rook, and I will most likely delete the old node and
create a new one with the same name. AFAIK, the OSDs are fine. When
rook rediscovers the OSDs, will it add them back with data intact? If
not, is there any way I can make it so it will?
Thanks!
--
ome filtering done with cluster id or
something to properly identify it.
FYI @Pedro Gonzalez Gomez <mailto:pegon...@redhat.com> @Ankush Behl
<mailto:anb...@redhat.com> @Aashish Sharma <mailto:aasha...@redhat.com>
Regards,
Nizam
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:05 PM Matthew Darwin w
t's why the utilization charts are empty
because it relies on
the prometheus info.
And I raised a PR to disable the new dashboard in quincy.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54250
Regards,
Nizam
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 6:09 PM Matthew Darwin wrote:
Hello,
We're not using
ff by default.
"ceph dashboard feature disable dashboard" works to put the old
dashboard back. Thanks.
On 2023-10-30 00:09, Nizamudeen A wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Is the prometheus configured in the cluster? And also the
PROMETHUEUS_API_URL is set? You can set it manually by ceph dashboard
set
Hi all,
I see17.2.7 quincy is published as debian-bullseye packages. So I
tried it on a test cluster.
I must say I was not expecting the big dashboard change in a patch
release. Also all the "cluster utilization" numbers are all blank now
(any way to fix it?), so the dashboard is much less
2023-08-22 08:00, Matthew Darwin wrote:
Thanks Rich,
On quincy it seems that provding an end-date is an error. Any other
ideas from anyone?
$ radosgw-admin sync error trim --end-date="2023-08-20 23:00:00"
end-date not allowed.
On 2023-08-20 19:00, Richard Bade wrote:
Hi Matthew,
At
s...
HTH,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
yet offer much time]
Regards,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Thanks Rich,
On quincy it seems that provding an end-date is an error. Any other
ideas from anyone?
$ radosgw-admin sync error trim --end-date="2023-08-20 23:00:00"
end-date not allowed.
On 2023-08-20 19:00, Richard Bade wrote:
Hi Matthew,
At least for nautilus (14.2.22) i have
Last few upgrades we upgraded ceph, then upgraded the O/S... it worked
great... I was hoping we could do the same again this time.
On 2023-08-21 12:18, Chris Palmer wrote:
Ohhh.. so if I read that correctly we can't upgrade either
debian or ceph until the dependency problem is resolved,
Hello all,
"radosgw-admin sync error list" returns errors from 2022. I want to
clear those out.
I tried "radosgw-admin sync error trim" but it seems to do nothing.
The man page seems to offer no suggestions
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/man/8/radosgw-admin/
Any ideas what I need to do
Assuming you're running systemctl OSDs you can run the following command on the
host that OSD 343 resides on.
systemctl restart ceph-osd@343
From: siddhit.ren...@nxtgen.com At: 07/20/23 13:44:36 UTC-4:00To:
ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: 1 PG stucked in "active+undersized+degrad
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 12:54, Mark Nelson wrote:
>
>
> On 7/6/23 06:02, Matthew Booth wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 15:18, Mark Nelson wrote:
> >> I'm sort of amazed that it gave you symbols without the debuginfo
> >> packages installed. I'
pping the number of tp_pwl
> threads from 4 to 1 and see if that changes anything.
Will do. Any idea how to do that? I don't see an obvious rbd config option.
Thanks for looking into this,
Matt
--
Matthew Booth
___
ceph-users mailing list
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 10:00, Matthew Booth wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 18:33, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:58 PM Mark Nelson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/3/23 04:53, Matthew Booth wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 14:24, Matthew Booth wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 10:45, Yin, Congmin wrote:
> >
> > Hi , Matthew
> >
> > I see "rbd with pwl cache: 5210112 ns", This latency is beyond my
> > expectations and I believe it is unlikely to
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 10:45, Yin, Congmin wrote:
>
> Hi , Matthew
>
> I see "rbd with pwl cache: 5210112 ns", This latency is beyond my
> expectations and I believe it is unlikely to occur. In theory, this value
> should be around a few hundred microseconds. But
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 18:33, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:58 PM Mark Nelson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/3/23 04:53, Matthew Booth wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 14:11, Mark Nelson wrote:
> > >>>>> This contain
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 08:50, Yin, Congmin wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Due to the latency of rbd layers, the write latency of the pwl cache is more
> than ten times that of the Raw device.
> I replied directly below the 2 questions.
>
> Best regards.
> Congmin Yin
ntime=60 --time_based=1
> >>>
> >>> And extracts sync.lat_ns.percentile["99.00"]
> >>
> >> Matthew, do you have the rest of the fio output captured? It would be
> >> interesting to see if it's just the 99th percentile that is bad or
ing with fio. Specifically I am running a containerised test,
>> executed with:
>>podman run --volume .:/var/lib/etcd:Z quay.io/openshift-scale/etcd-perf
>>
>> This container runs:
>>fio --rw=write --ioengine=sync --fdatasync=1
>> --directory=/var/lib/et
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 18:20, Josh Baergen wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> We've done a limited amount of work on characterizing the pwl and I think it
> suffers the classic problem of some writeback caches in that, once the cache
> is saturated, it's actually worse tha
d: 180 MiB
cached: 135 MiB
dirty: 0 B
free: 844 MiB
hits_full: 1 / 0%
hits_partial: 3 / 0%
misses: 21952
hit_bytes: 6 KiB / 0%
miss_bytes: 349 MiB
--
Matthew Booth
___
ceph-users mailing li
I have basically given up relying on bucket sync to work properly in
quincy. I have been running a cron job to manually sync files between
datacentres to catch the files that don't get replicated. It's pretty
inefficient, but at least all the files get to the backup datacentre.
Would love to
A bit late to the game, but I'm not sure if it is your drives. I had a very
similar issue to yours on enterprise drives (not that means much outside of
support).
What I was seeing is that a rebuild would kick off, PGs would instantly start
to become laggy and then our clients (openstack rbd) wo
e send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
>
--
Matthew Booth
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
4-0.fc37 -> 2:4.17.4-2.fc37
selinux-policy 37.16-1.fc37 -> 37.17-1.fc37
selinux-policy-targeted 37.16-1.fc37 -> 37.17-1.fc37
tpm2-tss 3.2.0-3.fc37 -> 3.2.1-1.fc37
Removed:
cracklib-dicts-2.9.7-30.fc37.x86_64
--
Matthew Booth
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
o be going...
Thanks,
Matthew
[0] https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/install/build-ceph/
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Hi Guys,
I've got a funny one I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction
with:
We've got three identical(?) Ceph nodes running 4 OSDs, Mon, Man, and iSCSI G/W
each (we're only a small shop) on Rocky Linux 8 / Ceph Quincy. Everything is
running fine, no bottle-necks (as far as we ca
We have a 14 osd node all ssd cluster and for some reason we are continually
getting laggy PGs and those seem to correlate to slow requests on Quincy
(doesn't seem to happen on our Pacific clusters). These laggy pgs seem to shift
between osds. The network seems solid, as in I'm not seeing errors
Hi Alex,
We also have a multi-site setup (17.2.5). I just deleted a bunch of
files from one side and some files got deleted on the other side but
not others. I waited 10 hours to see if the files would delete. I
didn't do an exhaustive test like yours, but seems similar issues. In
our case, l
Hey Ivan,
I think the answer would be multisite. I know there is a lot of effort
currently to work out the last few kinks.
This tracker might be of interest as it sounds like an already identified
issue, https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57562#change-228263
Matt
From: istvan.sz...@agoda.com At:
9, rum S14
____
From: Matthew Darwin
Sent: 14 October 2022 18:57:37
To:c...@elchaka.de;ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: strange OSD status when rebooting one server
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/matthewdarwin/aec3c2b16ba5e74beb4af1d49e
hint...
Hth
Am 14. Oktober 2022 18:45:40 MESZ schrieb Matthew Darwin
:
Hi,
I am hoping someone can help explain this strange message. I took 1 physical server
offline which contains 11 OSDs. "ceph -s" reports 11 osd down. Great.
But on the next line it says &qu
Hi,
I am hoping someone can help explain this strange message. I took 1
physical server offline which contains 11 OSDs. "ceph -s" reports 11
osd down. Great.
But on the next line it says "4 hosts" are impacted. It should only
be 1 single host? When I look the manager dashboard all the O
Hi Li,
Yeah, that's what I thought (about having the api_secure), so I checked
for the iscsi-gateway.cfg file and there's only one on the system, in
the /etc/ceph/ folder.
Any other ideas?
Cheers
PEREGRINE IT Signature On 09/09/2022 18:35, Xiubo Li wrote:
On 07/09/2022 17:37, duluxoz wrot
Hi Eneko,
Sorry for the round-about way of getting back to you (I can't seem to
work out how to reply/post to my original message - I'm obviously
tired/stupid/whatever :-)
Problem solved (about 15 minutes ago) - turns out I had a typo (one of
those small, hard to spot ones) - so a PBCAK (or
I did manage to get this working. Not sure what exactly fixed it, but
creating the pool "default.rgw.otp" helped. Why are missing pools not
automatically created?
Also this:
radosgw-admin sync status
radosgw-admin metadata sync run
On 2022-06-20 19:26, Matthew Darwin wrot
Not sure. Long enough to try the command and write this email, so at
least 10 minutes.
I expected it to disappear after 30 seconds or so.
On 2022-06-24 10:34, Laura Flores wrote:
Hi Matthew,
About how long did the warning stay up after you ran the `ceph
telemetry on` command?
- Laura
On
Thanks Yaarit,
The cluster I was using is just a test cluster with a few OSD and
almost no data. Not sure why I have to re-opt in upgrading from 17.2.0
to 17.2.1
On 2022-06-24 09:41, Yaarit Hatuka wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for your update. How big is the cluster?
Thanks for opting-in to
Sorry. Eventually it goes away. Just slower than I was expecting.
On 2022-06-23 23:42, Matthew Darwin wrote:
I just updated quincy from 17.2.0 to 17.2.1. Ceph status reports
"Telemetry requires re-opt-in". I then run
$ ceph telemetry on
$ ceph telemetry on --license sharing-
I just updated quincy from 17.2.0 to 17.2.1. Ceph status reports
"Telemetry requires re-opt-in". I then run
$ ceph telemetry on
$ ceph telemetry on --license sharing-1-0
Still the message "TELEMETRY_CHANGED( Telemetry requires re-opt-in)
message" remains in the log.
Any ideas how to get ri
Hi all,
Running into some trouble. I just setup ceph multi-site replication.
Good news is that it is syncing the data. But the metadata is NOT syncing.
I was trying to follow the instructions from here:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/radosgw/multisite/#create-a-secondary-zone
I see there
See this PR
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/19973
From: Josh Baergen
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 10:54 AM
To: Richard Bade
Cc: Ceph Users
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: osd_disk_thread_ioprio_class deprecated?
Hi Richard,
> Could anyone confirm this? And whic
Ubuntu Cloud Archive
helpful if you want a more recent Ceph than the version your release
shipped with; it can also help you decouple Ceph upgrades from OS upgrades.
HTH,
Matthew
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an
Hi,
On 07/01/2022 18:39, Gilles Mocellin wrote:
Anyone who had that problem find a workaround ?
Are you trying to reshard a bucket in a multisite setup? That isn't
expected to work (and, IIRC, the changes to support doing so aren't
going to make it into quincy).
Regards
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
