t wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew"
-
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 09:31:11 +0000
> From: "Saulter, Andrew"
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge
>
pplication of harmonic tidal series as boundary conditions to a
numerical tidal model.
Many thanks
Andy
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 09 May 2018 15:46
To: cf-metadata@cg
Dear Andy
> tidal_sea_surface_height_above_lowest_astronomical_tide
> Units: m
> "Sea surface height" is a time-varying quantity. "Height_above_X" means the
> vertical distance above the named surface X. "Chart datum" describes a local
> vertical reference from which depths displayed on a nautic
[mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Lowry,
Roy K.
Sent: 08 May 2018 16:04
To: Gregory, Jonathan ; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy,
I agree with Jonathan that specifically referencing LAT in the Standard
ompose the general quantity
> > > > > > > > named by omitting the phrase. Tides are a significant
> > > > > > > > contributor to the observed sea surface height; here “tide”
> > > > > > > > denotes a generic variable describing
t; named by omitting the phrase. Tides are a significant
> > > > > > > > contributor to the observed sea surface height; here “tide”
> > > > > > > > denotes a generic variable describing the time varying tidal
> > > > > > > >
generic
> > > > > > > variable describing the time varying tidal signal, for example as
> > > > > > > generated based on a summation of harmonically analysed
> > > > > > > components, or resulting from the application of such components
e all assumed to be annual mean
climatological values.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew"
-
> Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 08:15:00 +
> From: "Saulter, Andrew"
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: Re: [CF-me
rence_ellipsoid' is necessary)?
I'm not too keen on the generic reference_datum, and feel it would be better to
add names for the specific datums you use, if they are geophysical surfaces.
If they are arbitrary benchmarks, I agree that some way to name them is needed.
> Hopefully I'm no
urfaces.
If they are arbitrary benchmarks, I agree that some way to name them is needed.
> Hopefully I'm not talking total nonsense.
Of course not. Sorry this is so hard.
Best wishes
Jonathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On B
Andrew; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Hi Andy,
A thought that struck me as I read through your e-mail is that surges aren't
the only meteorological forcing. Whilst in a model the non-tide contributions
can be easily di
ement is urgent.
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Saulter,
Andrew
Sent: 03 May 2018 09:28
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Apologies; there were issues with the way my email formatted the last
tually using the existing
'height_above_reference_ellipsoid' might be more appropriate (basically I'm not
sure if a 'reference_datum_height_above_reference_ellipsoid' is necessary)?
Hopefully I'm not talking total nonsense.
Andy
-Original Message-
From:
iate (basically I'm not
sure if a 'reference_datum_height_above_reference_ellipsoid' is necessary)?
Hopefully I'm not talking total nonsense.
Andy
-----Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 02
-mail if your requirement is urgent.
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory
Sent: 02 May 2018 14:27
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
Thanks for your email. This is surprisingly mind-bending. Although M
e part "due to tide". But that
returns us to the question of what "without the tide" means.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew"
-
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:08:01 +
> From: "Saulter, Andrew"
> To: &q
ency signals are
> generally excluded?
>
> So some consensus as to whether "sea_surface_elevation" is the phrasing to go
> for would be very helpful...
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar
y
Sent: 24 April 2018 18:30
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
> - I'm only going to do this for sea water levels, so from my point of
> view using the term "sea" is fine; I'm just aware
egardless of what datum would be
> > used for z itself. I suggested before that change_in would be a possibility
> > but it doesn't sound quite right, because we aren't comparing SSH before
> > and after a storm surge for example, which is what I'd understan
m_surge' and 'due_to_tide' be sensibly appended to
'water_surface_height_above_reference_datum'??
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: John Graybeal [mailto:jbgrayb...@mindspring.com]
Sent: 23 April 2018 17:57
To: Saulter, Andrew
Cc: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standa
whether "sea_surface_elevation" is the phrasing to go
> for would be very helpful...
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
> Saulter, Andrew
> Sent: 20 April 2018 17:0
lto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Saulter, Andrew
Sent: 20 April 2018 17:04
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Jonathon, Helen,
Thanks for the feedback.
I'd looked at the existing 'sea_surface_heigh
..@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 11 April 2018 18:37
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Helen and Andy
I noticed the sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_X_tide names as well, and I
wondered, what does &
- Forwarded message from "Snaith, Helen M." -
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:14:16 +
> From: "Snaith, Helen M."
> To: "Saulter, Andrew"
> CC: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard na
Hi Andy
Many of the sea_surface_height terms have been used in satellite altimetry for
some time.
The tidal components have been split out into
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_equilibrium_ocean_tide
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_geocentric_ocean_tide
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_
Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew"
-----
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:13:18 +
> From: "Saulter, Andrew"
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
>
> Dear all,
>
&
Dear all,
First posting to this list, so please forgive me if I'm doing it wrong...
I'd like to request an addition to the standard name list to include storm
surge residual and tide. These variables are generated for the purpose of
coastal flood prediction and will be available in future, netC
27 matches
Mail list logo
