On Friday 22 Aug 2003 18:08 pm, Calvin Ward wrote:
> It's a work around if it is an additional requirement.
> Setting content-type is not necessarily required in all forms of output.
I was under the impression you only had to set it if you were not outputting
text/html... which you'd have to do a
iday, August 22, 2003 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: DevNet Pro watermark
> On Thursday 21 Aug 2003 20:08 pm, Calvin Ward wrote:
> > something of this nature. Having to spend time coding around something
that
>
> If you're not setting content-type correctly, it's hardly 'work ar
On Thursday 21 Aug 2003 20:08 pm, Calvin Ward wrote:
> something of this nature. Having to spend time coding around something that
If you're not setting content-type correctly, it's hardly 'work around' to do
it the right way.
--
Tom C
"Land of the free, home of the brave... you have to be brav
f" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 12:26 PM
Subject: RE: DevNet Pro watermark
> Have a look at this post on Steven Erat's blog addressing this very issue:
>
>
http://63.76.26.194/index.cfm?data=200308
M
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: DevNet Pro watermark
>
>Has anyone else had issues with the DevNet Pro CFMX 6.1 watermark breaking
>things like javascript output based templates, xml templates, plaintext
>generating templates (such as strings for older flash movies) and so forth?
>
>
x27;t cover, please let me know.
Steven Erat
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: DevNet Pro watermark
Has anyone else had issues with the DevNet Pro CFMX 6.1 watermark breaking things like
javas
Has anyone else had issues with the DevNet Pro CFMX 6.1 watermark breaking
things like javascript output based templates, xml templates, plaintext
generating templates (such as strings for older flash movies) and so forth?
I've had to revert my CFMX DevNet Pro install back to 6 because it prevente
7 matches
Mail list logo
