e
way you think and what makes the most sense to you.
--Ben Doom
Programmer & General Lackey
Moonbow Software
: -Original Message-
: From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony@;navtrak.net]
: Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:53 PM
: To: CF-Talk
: Subject: RE: cfscript performance
mber 2002 10:53 a.m.
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
>
>
> but isnt an included file,
> with some reusable code in it
> just as fast as a UDF? I guess maybe the only
> reason not would be the time to access the file
> referenced in the cfin
Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Rob Rohan [mailto:rob@;cardinalweb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript
w.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
I would tend to argue that you should at least know the basics so that
you
can create quick UDFs for things you do often -- that's saved me hours
and
hours of coding time.
They a
that - none that I can think of.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony@;navtrak.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
it certainly helpsthanks for the infoalthough
I am sure there will be a floo
o use. :-)
--Ben Doom
Programmer & General Lackey
Moonbow Software
: -Original Message-
: From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony@;navtrak.net]
: Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:29 PM
: To: CF-Talk
: Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
:
:
: it certainly helpsthanks for
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
it certainly helpsthanks for the infoalthough
I am sure there will be a flood of opinions on this, so that's really
why I started the thread
should any of us who don't already know, bother learning that way
it certainly helpsthanks for the infoalthough
I am sure there will be a flood of opinions on this, so that's
really why I started the thread
should any of us who don't already know, bother learning that way of
coding for cf?
..tony
Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System De
t the bear; some days the bear eats you.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 19:18
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: [CFSCRIPT performance]
>
>
> i thin
> I've done multiple else if() statements within cfscript many times. No
> problems at all.
OK, so maybe I shouldn't just trust the books - since it didn't mention
being able to have multiple else if()s, I had avoided them
Code re-write time, methinks
Philip Arnold
Director
Certified ColdFusi
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 27, 2001 11:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFSCRIPT performance
> I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is
> quicker to use
> CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewis
I've done multiple else if() statements within cfscript many times. No
problems at all.
Evan
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 12:26 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFSCRIPT performance
>
> > There is too an else if. Just do else if(). Use it all over the
> > place. Never had a problem.
>
> How come the docs say you can only do else and place the if inside
> the else...
>
> I've done else if() before - as it's actually else { if() }
>
> I'll have to check with multiple else if(
> There is too an else if. Just do else if(). Use it all over the
> place. Never had a problem.
How come the docs say you can only do else and place the if inside the
else...
I've done else if() before - as it's actually else { if() }
I'll have to check with multiple else if()s
Philip Arnold
D
There is too an else if. Just do else if(). Use it all over the place. Never
had a problem.
Bob Everland
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 11:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFSCRIPT performance
> I have a quest
> I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is
> quicker to use
> CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewise quicker to use the
> CFSCRIPT if()
> over CFIF? I have a CFIF checking that one of 14 empressions are met (13
> ORs). Would it be better to use CFSCRIPT for this?
>
> Th
: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [CFSCRIPT performance]
i think cfscript is faster and less intensive in bigger blocks.
"Russel Madere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is quicker to use
CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewis
i think cfscript is faster and less intensive in bigger blocks.
"Russel Madere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is quicker to use
CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewise quicker to use the CFSCRIPT if()
over CFIF? I have a CFIF
18 matches
Mail list logo
