On Monday 14 August 2006 03:46, Bobby Hartsfield wrote:
> Thats hardly a reason considering that there are plenty of Linux exploits,
> viruses and worms as well... not to mention that they are MUCH easier to
> disguise in Linux ;-)
--
Tom Chiverton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fedora vs. RedHat
On Friday 11 August 2006 10:52, Jerky San Pedro wrote:
> I just have one question, why shouldn't people try and run things on
> Windows Server if they have the money to spare.
Put t
On Friday 11 August 2006 10:52, Jerky San Pedro wrote:
> I just have one question, why shouldn't people try and run things on
> Windows Server if they have the money to spare.
Put the can down. Slowly.
Do not, repeat, do not open it.
Now, back away from the can.
There is high chance it contains w
I am not yet gonna move to CentOS. I am trying Fedora on for size. I got the
disappointment of a lifetime with my RHAS 2.1. I bet it was all easy when you
have all RPMs at your fingertips. Any warnings on Fedora and CFMX going
together?
I just have one question, why shouldn't people try and run
Tom Chiverton wrote:
>
> I've only ever come close to calling Macrodobe once, and offering my own card
> never mind a corporate one, due to a massive performance problem.
> In the end I did fix it myself (dump error), but it was nice to know I could
> have just phone an expert up, given them the
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 21:14, Rick Root wrote:
> Of course you still can't call up Adobe and get help unless you just
> tell them you're using RHEL ;)
Indeed.
I've only ever come close to calling Macrodobe once, and offering my own card
never mind a corporate one, due to a massive performanc
I understand that CentOS won't be "supported"
But as long as RHEL continues to be "supported" by Adobe in terms of
making sure Coldfusion works on RHEL, then Coldfusion will work on
CentOS with zero difficulty. Ie, if RHEL is a QA platform for Adobe,
you'll be fine with CentOS.
Of course you
This is the key. I've begun moving *away* from "supported" platforms
in many cases because in so many cases the user/community support for
a similar, but "unsupported" platform is *so* much better than
corporate support.
For whatever reason, this has worked out really well for me and my
experienc
Tom Chiverton wrote:
>>Anything that is certified for RHEL will work on CentOS.
>
>
> But won't be supported :-)
>
By RedHat... ;)
--
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
Blue Dragon Alliance Member
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 15:05, Rick Root wrote:
> Do *NOT* use Redhat 9.
...
> there are NO security
> updates being made for it any more. If you go with Redhat 9, you'll
> probably be running a fairly insecure server.
http://fedoralegacy.org/updates/RH9/
till at least the end of the year.
linux distribution that CF would have official support.
Sincerely,
Oðuz Demirkapý
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 9. August 2006 16:05
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fedora vs. RedHat
Jerky San Pedro wrote:
> We are upgrading our server f
Jerky San Pedro wrote:
> We are upgrading our server from RedHat 7.3 to Fedora 4 or 5 or to Red Hat
> 9.0. We are also upgrading from ColdFusion 5 to ColdFusion MX 6.1. From what
> I've read, it seems that support for Red Hat 9.0 has been dropped 2 years
> ago.
Do *NOT* use Redhat 9. It isn't
Jerky San Pedro wrote:
> We are upgrading our server from RedHat 7.3 to Fedora 4 or 5 or to Red Hat
> 9.0. We are also upgrading from ColdFusion 5 to ColdFusion MX 6.1. From what
> I've read, it seems that support for Red Hat 9.0 has been dropped 2 years
> ago.
>
> This is my first time to ins
Hi Jerky,
I asked for similar advice awhile back and was told to look at CentOS
(http://www.centos.org/). From the site:
"CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from sources
freely provided to the public by a prominent North American Enterprise
Linux vendor. CentOS conforms
Given your choices, I'd vote for Fedora. RH9 is pretty old by now and
no longer supported, I believe, having been phased out by the
Enterprise Linux (EL) and Advanced Server (AS) products. Fedora is,
at the risk of oversimplification, the testing ground for Redhat's
supported Linux versions (the
15 matches
Mail list logo
