49 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: problem with CFFunction return
>
>
> Hi Raymond,
>
> Thanks again. After almost the whole day's struggling(try
> this, try that),it suddenly works fine. We actually changed
> nothing! So strange! This made us very uncomfortable
o fix it?
For the suggestion you made we also tried and of course it works fine too now.
Regards,
Sima
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: problem with CFFunction return
> >I not
> >I notice you set stringbalue to
> application[somekey][somekey]etc. Are you sure that key exists?
>
> Yes, because this is tha same code as on the developer's
> machine and and the same database. That is why when we put
> the function directly in the application.cfm it works fine.
> But if u
Hi Dave,
Thank for the response. Yes, we have a documentation which outlines every step in how
to config the server.
Sima
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: problem with CFFunction return
>
ut if use it got the problem.
Thanks.
Sima
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: problem with CFFunction return
First, why the use of cfsilent? Is it because you discover that calls to
cffunction-ba
First, why the use of cfsilent? Is it because you discover that calls to
cffunction-based UDFs generate white space? Simply add output=false to
your cffunction tag and that will go away. (This assumes your UDF isn't
mean to output directly, which it should not do 99% of the time.)
So, what do you
> It works fine with all the three developer's local machines (CFMX).
> However when the code was sent to QA, MX complains that the variable
> CT_OUT is not defined.
Are all four machines running the same exact version of CFMX?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice:
7 matches
Mail list logo
