> That's one reason I like TinyMCE, you can customize it to your needs so
> you're not giving people access to completely break everything.
I've got one client with a TON of admin forms with FCK all over them.
The client does *everything* in Word and then paste, and that's why we
went with FCK.
Toolbars can be configured in FCKEditor, too. And the new version works on a
couple other browsers.
TinyMCE is very nice, but the lack of image upload and preview is enough for me
to not use it. My experience is that clients need and love this feature. Rick
Root developed a "plugin" that kind o
Correction: the features I listed as "new" were there in previous versions. New
features are flash objects, support for Active FoxPro Pages, etc.
> I like FCKEditor v1.6.
>
> Version 2 is out with additional features (like form creation, tables,
> fonts, colors, etc). Some people love them; I
> -Original Message-
> From: Irvin Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I like FCKEditor v1.6.
FCKeditor v1 only works with IE.
> Version 2 is out with additional features (like form
> creation, tables, fonts, colors, etc). Some people love them;
> I consider them useless and potential
I like FCKEditor v1.6.
Version 2 is out with additional features (like form creation, tables, fonts,
colors, etc). Some people love them; I consider them useless and potentially
dangerous - if given too many options, users will soon destroy the site's look.
(it should be pointed out that you ca
With Tiny's plugin authoring capabilities, integrating an existing
spellchecker is literally like 10 lines of code. We did that for our
main application, and it was a breeze. Tiny's also got a built-in
plugin for IESpell (which I've never used), and supports the Google
Toolbar's spellchecker (whi
> So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
> our own simple CMS?
Until TinyMCE gets native Spellerpages support, I'll consider
FCKeditor the go-to WYSIWYG editor.
--
Roger Benningfield
http://journurl.com/
http://admin.support.journurl.com/
I love Xstandard.
http://www.xstandard.com
- j
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best Rich Text Editor (was: RE: Looking for very simple CMS)
> -Original Message-
> From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who
> need to build our own simple CMS?
I still love TinyMCE.
--
Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Limu Company - http://www.thelimuc
FCKeditor.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2005 18:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Best Rich Text Editor (was: RE: Looking for very simple CMS)
So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
our own simple CMS?
I like KTML. It is cross browser, multiple OS. The only issue for many
developers is that it requires dreamweaver to first install into your site,
but it is easily made into a custom tag after that to use without
dreamweaver at all. Their support is pretty good.
http://www.interaktonline.com/Pr
TinyMCE is my favorite. Very nice interface, both for the user and
the developer, and extension is a snap.
cheers,
barneyb
On 8/10/05, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
> our own simple CMS? I keep hearing FCK
12 matches
Mail list logo
