I run Windows NLB on 2 cf7 enterprise servers each with 2 clustered
instances of CF - to be honest, I've never had any problem
whatsoever. Uptime of the servers was up till recently just shy of 600
days (and that's on Windows - and don't go on about not applying
patches etc) CF has been rock s
alancing.
It's better than Windows NLB clustering on most aspects?
Helge
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31. januar 2007 09:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What hw to use for loadbalancing
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
> The problem is not al
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
> The problem is not always there, but happens especially with one
> customer using clustered terminal servers and Internet Explorer.
>
> It seems that they are always connected to one of the cluster nodes
Are the terminal servers in the same subnet as your cluster? If so, w
Look into CoyotePoint
We use Cisco Netscalers which I think are cheaper than the F5 but I'm not
completely sure about that. I know that CoyotePoint makes some nicer
entry-level LBs
Dave Ross
http://www.coldspringframework.org
>Hello,
>
>What (lower priced) options other than F5 Big IP LTM have
ss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30. januar 2007 16:54
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What hw to use for loadbalancing
The cheapest option would be to roll something yourself. There are many
options available for nice loadbalancing set up using linux and setting
up 2 boxes, so that should one die, the
would be a better and more stable/powerful solution.
Helge
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30. januar 2007 16:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What hw to use for loadbalancing
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
>
> What I basically need is something
still
free) solution using something like linuxvirtualserver.
LVS Kiss looks like a simple solution to set up that supports health
checking.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: WebSite CFtalk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:29 AM
> To: CF-Talk
>
WebSite CFtalk wrote:
>
> What I basically need is something that works better than W2003 NLB.
> (and not to difficult to establish/maintain)
>
> When JRun/CF dies behind the NLB cluster, the cluster is happily
> continuing its loadbalancing as if nothing happened.
Did you cluster JRun or just I
Hello,
What (lower priced) options other than F5 Big IP LTM have I got when I
need to loadbalance 3 CFMX servers?
3 x CFMX 7.x Enterprise on W2003 / IIS6
F5 is a bit expensive -18kUSD for Big-IP LTM 1500
What I basically need is something that works better than W2003 NLB.
(and not to difficult
9 matches
Mail list logo
