[cfaussie] Re: Attached vs. embedded (cfmail, multipart/mixed, attachments, embedded image)

2009-07-22 Thread charlie arehart
...@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of Steve Onnis > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:45 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Attached vs. embedded (cfmail, multipart/mixed, > attachments, embedded image) > Importance: High > > > Did you try it "AS

[cfaussie] Re: Attached vs. embedded (cfmail, multipart/mixed, attachments, embedded image)

2009-07-22 Thread Steve Onnis
Did you try it "AS IS "? It worked fine the way it was -Original Message- From: randzman [mailto:randz...@verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 10:43 PM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Attached vs. embedded (cfmail, multipart/mixed, attachments, embedded image) St

[cfaussie] Re: Attached vs. embedded (cfmail, multipart/mixed, attachments, embedded image)

2009-07-22 Thread randzman
Steve, thank you for the quick reply...I tried you code exactly as provided (except I needed to add disposition="inline" for the image, which works, as it did with my own tests) but the file didn't come through as an attachment but instead in the body. The header shows Content-Type as multipart/re

[cfaussie] Re: Attached vs. embedded (cfmail, multipart/mixed, attachments, embedded image)

2009-07-21 Thread Steve Onnis
This worked for me -Original Message- From: randzman [mailto:randz...@verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 9:02 AM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Attached vs. embedded (cfmail, multipart/mixed, attachments, embedded image) I want to send a mail which has a PDF