Hi, Ashley!
I'll put your msvc patches into trunk, now. Would you mind adding
a few lines to the README that list particular issues specific to
the MSVC build?
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.
From: Vincent Manis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Chicken-users] Revised Chapter 1 draft
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:12:57 -0800
> I've uploaded a draft of a comprehensive expansion of Chapter 1 of the
> manual
> to http://chicken.wiki.br/new-chapter1 . The intention is to give a
> new user
> a
I've uploaded a draft of a comprehensive expansion of Chapter 1 of the
manual
to http://chicken.wiki.br/new-chapter1 . The intention is to give a
new user
a `big picture' of Chicken by going through some of the most basic use
cases,
such as running the interpreter, compiling and loading modul
felix winkelmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Hans Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I'll have to use eval, but I don't think it's going to work if I use
this kind of s-expr inside a function? Like
(define (blah x)
(sasm (jmp ,x)))
(where SASM is the name of the m
From: "Nelson Castillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] aliases in the wiki
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:04:34 -0500
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Nelson Castillo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Could we please remove this? It makes a grep over the working
> > > copy impos
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Nelson Castillo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could we please remove this? It makes a grep over the working
> > copy impossible.
>
> Hi Felix.
>
> What about:
>
> find -P . -print0 | xargs -0 grep TEXT
Sorry.
It is:
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep
> Could we please remove this? It makes a grep over the working
> copy impossible.
Hi Felix.
What about:
find -P . -print0 | xargs -0 grep TEXT
Regards,
N.-
--
http://arhuaco.org
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lis
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tweaked a bit the code in Svnwiki a bit to support defining
> aliases for functions in the wiki. My thinking is that (1) for all
> procedures f, http://chicken.wiki.br/f should return something useful,
>
A couple of notes on the msvc build I forgot to mention previously:
- When specifying PREFIX during the build, use /:
make PLATFORM=msvc PREFIX=c:/development/chicken-msvc
Backslashes will cause problems and aren't used internally anyway.
- Currently, you have to compile with -DPIC or you'll
felix winkelmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
The build runs on msys with no problems. Tomorrow I plan to add
a setup for cmd.exe, so a user only needs to have gnu make installed
to build chicken for visual c. That seems like a pretty low
Hi folks,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:14:32 -0500 "Graham Fawcett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Vincent Manis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it be possible to put together a package of GnuWin32 programs so
> > as to make Chicken building and egg installation re
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Vincent Manis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be possible to put together a package of GnuWin32 programs so
> as to make Chicken building and egg installation reliable on Windows?
> I guess that would include make, gzip, tar, maybe cp, rm, mv, and I
> don'
Ah, I see. Thanks a lot! --daishi
At Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:08:25 +0100,
Peter Bex wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:57:42PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > OK, so that was stupid.
> >
> > How about this?
> >
> > (define a 'values)
> > (define b '((1 2 3) #(4 5 6))
> >
> > I'd like to evaluate
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:57:42PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> OK, so that was stupid.
>
> How about this?
>
> (define a 'values)
> (define b '((1 2 3) #(4 5 6))
>
> I'd like to evaluate (values '(1 2 3) '#(4 5 6))
> using eval, a and b.
More of the same:
(eval (cons a (map (cut list 'quote <>)
OK, so that was stupid.
How about this?
(define a 'values)
(define b '((1 2 3) #(4 5 6))
I'd like to evaluate (values '(1 2 3) '#(4 5 6))
using eval, a and b.
--daishi
At Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:29:55 +0100,
Peter Bex wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:22:36PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, This might be a stupid question, but would someone help me
> understand the following eval example? I was expecting to get 1.
[...]
> #;1> (define a 'car)
> #;2> (define b '(1 2 3))
> #;3> (eval (list a b))
> Error: call of non-procedure
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:22:36PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might be a stupid question,
> but would someone help me understand the following eval example?
> I was expecting to get 1.
You're evaluating (car (1 2 3))
You want to be evaluating (car (list 1 2 3)) or (car (quote (1 2 3
Hi,
This might be a stupid question,
but would someone help me understand the following eval example?
I was expecting to get 1.
Daishi
8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--
CHICKEN
Version 2.732 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables applyhook
cross ]
(c)
On 22 Feb 2008, at 10:56 am, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
I'd hope it to be few, and would want to handle it with a suitable
macro around the afflicted bits of code, rather than duplicating the
whole source file...
Yes, that'd seem a more reasonable approach, I'd have to say...
Alejo, duck
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:34:36 +0100 Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:38:25AM -0800, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
> > So what about the idea of adding a (supported-releases 2.3 3.0.0) tag
> > to the meta file, where particular versions of an egg that needs to do
>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:38:25AM -0800, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
> So what about the idea of adding a (supported-releases 2.3 3.0.0) tag
> to the meta file, where particular versions of an egg that needs to do
> so specify which is the range of Chicken releases it supports?
Actually, this
> I'd hope it to be few, and would want to handle it with a suitable
> macro around the afflicted bits of code, rather than duplicating the
> whole source file...
Yes, that'd seem a more reasonable approach, I'd have to say...
Alejo, ducking to avoid the rotten oranges that Felix will throw at
hi
On 21 Feb 2008, at 3:39 pm, Hans Nowak wrote:
(Which leads me to wonder, *are* there Lisps/Schemes that have
first-class macros? Where you can, for example, pass a macro as an
argument to map, the way you can do with a function?)
There can be, in principle, but they wouldn't be very compila
On 21 Feb 2008, at 8:13 pm, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
What percentage of the eggs do we really expect to require different
code for each Chicken release? I would imagine that the percentage is
very small, but I don't really know...
I'd hope it to be few, and would want to handle it with
Any help documenting that egg would be appreciated. :-)
Well, we got a hackathon tomorrow, haven't we? Put that on the list,
and I'll have a crack at it. I like writing API documentation, oddly...
ABS
--
Alaric Snell-Pym
Work: http://www.snell-systems.co.uk/
Play: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/a
> To keep egg sources for released but old versions, with the option
> of maintaining them. It's quite frustrating (as all of us know), that if
> I reinstall some eggs (say on a new machine), and those eggs
> use features that are only supported in newer chickens.
So what about the idea of adding
On 2008 Feb 21, at 23:57, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
As such, I will need more convincing before implementing support for
. I don't see what it adds that we can't already do. Ok,
I see that it would allow arbitrary pages to declare sub-topics of a
given topic, but I don't think that should
On 2008 Feb 22, at 01:08, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
games.com> wrote:
The build runs on msys with no problems. Tomorrow I plan to add
a setup for cmd.exe, so a user only needs to have gnu make installed
to build chicken for visual c.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Umm, what's the motivation for this?
To keep egg sources for released but old versions, with the option
of maintaining them. It's quite frustrating (as all of us know), that if
I reinstall some eggs (say on a
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> The build runs on msys with no problems. Tomorrow I plan to add
> a setup for cmd.exe, so a user only needs to have gnu make installed
> to build chicken for visual c. That seems like a pretty low barrier
> for windows
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Hans Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess I'll have to use eval, but I don't think it's going to work if I use
> this kind of s-expr inside a function? Like
>
>(define (blah x)
> (sasm (jmp ,x)))
>
> (where SASM is the name of the macro that han
31 matches
Mail list logo
