(painfully) obvious that I don't know anything
about AppImage, so if you can explain in more detail or send links to clarify,
it would be most appreciated.
Thanks!
-elf
From: Daniel Ziltener
To: chicken-users@nongnu.org
Date: 28 Sep 2022 22:37:59
Subject: Request for feedback: Chicken as a
would be a better development methodology
that wouldn't shift the burden from paying attention to what one is using to a
psychic programme that does what you mean (not what you tell it).
-elf
On 20 November 2022 20:55:09 GMT+02:00, Lassi Kortela wrote:
>I have a .egg file for a porta
Erm, what's wrong with the tk bindings, which should work everywhere already?
-elf
On 23 March 2023 02:36:43 GMT+02:00, Matt Welland
wrote:
>That would be great Thomas. For my part, I'll start working on my project
>using what I can, learning Godot along the way. When you g
, so...
-elf
On 23 March 2023 13:43:10 GMT+02:00, Matt Welland
wrote:
>Tk is great, no doubt about it. I still miss Eric Gallesio's STk. The
>reasons I decided against tk include:
>
> 1. Clunky 1980's look and feel. (i)
> 2. No IOS or Android support. (ii)
> 3.
Thanks! I'll try to look into it and run some tests and speed comparisons in
about a week. (Lots of weddings right now, so it's unlikely i can do anything
earlier than that.) Have you made bindings for all the hashes and block ciphers?
-elf
On 11 June 2023 02:59:23 GMT+03:00, Th
The mode arguments are documented
http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#ports
-elf
On 24 August 2023 19:55:35 GMT+03:00, Lewis Levin
wrote:
>After installing r7rs, ‘open-output-port’ is a more complete implementation
>with this signature:
>
>open-output-file name . mode
independent.)
-elf
On 26 November 2018 5:15:03 GMT+02:00, Matt Welland wrote:
>Isn't Termux similar to UserLand - a compatibility layer of sorts
>similar to LXC or LXD? If so, I would not be surprised to see
>incompatibilities. I had to do several hacks to get IUP working on
>UserLand
ive not seen any ftlk apps, and the library from my readings is very limited.
i have seen many wx apps, and despite being horrible code (in many cases)
the ui still works more or less as expected.
-elf
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Harri Haataja wrote:
On 09/07/07, Adhi Hargo <[EMAIL PROTEC
it might be beneficial to review oleg's site... he has a lot of good stuff
on db interfaces and abstraction in scheme. (and iirc, has one or more
pure scheme relational db implementations available.)
-elf
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Matthew Welland wrote:
First off, my heartfelt thanks t
i'd be happy to put the time in if we can discuss it a bit more. i already
have ~80% of the eggs installed locally so its to my benefit as well. :)
-elf
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
Hello, everybody.
The time has come again, where I'm getting down on my kn
are you refactoring the module system?
if so, why not just 'module'? module is good and clear.
if you want it to be chicken-specific, how about 'carton' or 'crate'?
(those being enclosures for eggs)
-elf
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
IHi!
has anyone suggested 'coop' yet? after all, coops are often modular and
theyre useful for keeping chickens and eggs...
-elf
(and i know im boring, but i think that 'module' would be just fine. :) )
___
Chicken-users mailin
characteristics.
assuming wikipedia can be trusted. at least its sourced in this case.
-elf
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On 9/8/07, Pierpaolo Bernardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UTF8 has no BOM. A BOM in a utf8 file should be there only if you
put it there.
Not true.
ht
ld not be used.
In particular, whenever a data stream is declared to be UTF-16BE,
UTF-16LE, UTF-32BE or UTF-32LE a BOM must not be used. See also [
why not fix scite to not put in chars it shouldnt?
-elf
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
On 9/9/07, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL
possible to read the unicode strings from a different file in windows with the
bom? using the BOM as a recognition is considered broken behaviour, in general,
for utf-8.
-elf
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 9/8/07, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and does not state an
have you put in (use syntax-case) already?
-elf
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Terrence Brannon wrote:
When I attempt to use pos.scm I get this error -
#;9> ; loading /usr/local/lib/chicken/1/pos.scm ...
Error: (define-syntax) during expansion of (define-syntax ...) -
highlevel macros are
i'm not entirely sure i follow what youre asking. i think proper define-syntax
support would be nice (with syntax-rules, im ambivalent on syntax-case), but
i understand why its not there. unless the generation code is highly optimised,
they tend to be a lose anyway...
-elf
On Mon, 1
WHY are you studying apl? if you want monadic programming, use haskell.
-elf
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 9/11/07, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been a fan of J for a long time, and have an implementation of
monadic array processing i
perhaps theres a (declare (inline)) in the source.
-elf
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Why do all the following commands produce identical binaries
(using chicken's svn version)?
1. csc -d0 -disable-interrupts -disable-stack-overflow-checks -feature srfi-1
-inline -i
heh, the docs are wrong then. i was going to post inline-limit to inline, but
according to the pdf, inline-limit only applies if inline is also given.
-elf
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 9/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all.
Why do all the fol
piled code, if i understand properly, but
i avoid it all in favour of 'unhygenic' macros, which at least behave more
or less consistently across implementations and dont bloat.
-elf
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Ozzi wrote:
I've got an older G3 iBook that I'm trying to get Chicken work
(command-line-arguments) instead of argv, which also doesnt have the arg0
listed.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Eugene Ossintsev wrote:
Hi,
What do you, guys, usually do to make (argv) portable between the scripted
and compiled versions of a CHICKEN Scheme program?
For some reason (argv) in scripts
(foreign-lambda int "daemon" int int) ,
but thats just me.)
-elf
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
Ozzi wrote:
I am working on for creating unix daemons. Can anyone tell me how to
redirect stdout and stderr? I want to redirect them to /dev/null by
default.
He
grok that. im trying to get chicken working in visual studio. this does not
rate amongst the 'fun' things i have done. yay work requiring ms os.
-elf
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 10/26/07, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
heh, none of these a
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
Elf wrote:
um, why not just use (duplicate-fileno (portfileno )) ? [...]
Because not the file descriptor of a given port should be duplicated but
rather the file descriptor of a given port should be replaced by a
duplicate of another one
potential converts, and
has the highest visibility for ALL distributions. (go to the page for any
given distrib, and some subset of the above will be displayed most prominently
under 'features', along with whatever library/module system they use.)
sorry. :)
-elf
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007
) everyone else does it!
d) why am i ending the sentences with exclamation points!
really, it doesnt matter. theres plenty of code with both, its entirely a
personal preference issue.
-elf
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Mark Fredrickson wrote:
William Ramsay wrote:
Is there such a thing as a Chicken/Scheme
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Benedikt Rosenau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:47:25PM -0800, Elf wrote:
really, it doesnt matter. theres plenty of code with both, its entirely a
personal preference issue.
Well, not exactly the question asked, but something I learned from
reading Chicken&#
i have a working cygwin compile, but i'm still not quite sure how it happened.
the targz with the modifications to the various files and built objects is
too large to attach to a trac ticket.
-elf
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Terrence Brannon wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007 1:41 AM, felix winkelmann &l
es which are not
deprecated), so we can avoid eggs breakage when the current trunk
becomes the stable release.
quick question, then. what ARE the alternate procedures for the deprecated
ones, as i can't seem to find any reference to similar functionality in the
docs, wiki, or a quick grep o
i cant! im on a dynamic ip and your box blocks my direct mails. :(
-elf
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 7:43 AM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have a working cygwin compile, but i'm still not quite sure how it happened.
the targz with the modif
gdk display != x display
-elf
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, William Ramsay wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone explain why I'm getting a segmentation fault when I
run the following code:
(require-extension xlib)
.
(let*
((disp (gdk_display_get_default))
(cmap (xdefaultcolormap d
in the xlib egg, there was (at least formerly) info on how to get the x
display. in the gdk docs for system interface (not in the egg), there should
be documentation on which call/macro will give you gdkdisplay->xdisplay
(and possibly vice versa).
-elf
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, William Ram
first, please redownload and install the egg. second, for the installation,
do chicken-setup -k silex , and send the generated .c file please? thanks.
-elf
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Kevin Hammack wrote:
I downloaded the latest chicken release and compiled it on my PowerBook
running 10.4.11
there is with eformat, but not with format. sending eformat to you separately,
since its not yet in final form.
-elf
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, William Ramsay wrote:
Is there an easy way to format a number with a possible leading zero using
format or sprintf?
In other words I want 9 to show us
heh, are the n810s out yet? i wanted to get one and port chicken to it as
my new organiser...
-elf
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Matthew Welland wrote:
Has anyone attempted this? Which gui (if any) works?
I see this:
http://zedstar.org/blog/2007/11/07/latest-chicken-scheme-packaged-for-openmoko
what version are you running against? mingw wont necessarily work on anything
but svn head.
-elf
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marc-Antoine Desroches wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to setup chicken on windows xp, with no luck.
mingw32-make.exe PLATFORM=mingw
mingw32-make.exe -f Makefile.ming
aware that records werent available at runtime...
-elf
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Rick Taube wrote:
how do i get define-macro and define-record available at runtime so i can
load some interpreted code that uses them? im in an app that launches
chicken, ie im not using csi...
ive tried evalling the
do you have gmp properly installed?
-elf
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Rick Taube wrote:
the numbers egg doesnt seem to build on my OSX box, this is the first time
ive tied buiding an egg so if im doint something wrong please let me know
best, rick
galen:/Lisp/grace hkt$ csi -v
CHICKEN
Version
um, if you already issued a DATA, a QUIT wont work until you send a
CRLF.CRLF. otherwise the QUIT just goes into the message body/header.
this is correct behaviour.
-elf
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Jean-Philippe Theberge wrote:
Hi,
Am I doing something wrong here?
#;22> (defin
)
granted, none of these do errorchecking or whatnot, but that should be trivial
to add.
-elf
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Zbigniew wrote:
Ozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am using the following code, which just takes a single string:
(define (system->string cmd)
(string-chomp (with-input
efully!) make life a bit easier for handling cases
where one wants to catch errors and continue without designating some arbitrary
value as 'condition caught' to prevent some set of statements from executing.
hope this helps!
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
the ##current-line and ##current-file are now #!current-line and #!current-file,
as ## is reserved for qualified symbols, which these certainly are not. :)
apologies for any confusion this may have caused.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken
interesting you bring this up. ive been working on a new set of condition
macro extensions for handling this sort of behaviour. :)
-elf
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 10:32 AM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on that note, something that does work in the g
(car ,initval
(,param)
i think should do the trick. this will define the given param name to the
optional initval if undefined, or give the current value of the param if it
was previously defined. this was just a quick throway so there might be an
error.
-e
on that note, something that does work in the general case:
(define-macro (define-if-undefined name . val)
`(condition-case ,name
(()(define ,name ,@val
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, minh thu wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to register symbols in Chicken, just as a global
(define ...)
i've been working on some revised shootout progs for a while, but never bothered
submitting. should i?
-elf
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Isaac Gouy wrote:
--- Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By the way, folks, the existing program was easy to fix; it had PLT
Scheme-isms
would almost certainly be a bad idea.
a third possibility is similar to whats in place already... have explicitly
named elements of an associated proplist with each var/func, optionally.
-elf
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Hans Nowak scripsit:
Re docstrings: My next question would be
maintain in
the long run, i think. unfortunately it doesnt solve the problem of arity.
arity should be fairly simple though...
-elf
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Mark Fredrickson wrote:
a third possibility is similar to whats in place already... have explicitly
named elements of an associated proplist
. additionally, whats the arity of case-lambda? or of parameters?
perhaps instead of a direct arity function/macro, a valid-arity? macro
could exist instead. that should trade in the can of worms of arity for
an entirely different, hopefully smaller can.
-elf
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Kon Lovett
e it was a testing ground for me, but its not necessarily 'better'.
after i get the current chicken version built, ill dig up the files, retest
em, and submit them to the shootout, if its oke with felix and the various
people who have previously submitted benchmarks.
-elf
On Thu, 31
s. for my second thought, regarding simply
a valid-arity?, the representation would probably just be one extra byte
per function (top bit - rest? bottom 127 = min arity).
-elf
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
simplest arity is a pair, int . bool, required args and rest?
eywords are silently ignored (which is incorrect behaviour,
imho), i would say that keywords == rest.
i do think that the handling of keywords should automatically catch invalid
arguments, though, in which case keywords should either be a count or
included in optional-count. storing an extra syml
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
i was bringing up the case-lambda and parameters as being special cases
of forms with the number of required args not necessarily the same as
the maximum number of args, ie its 'rest?' but its not a true rest,
in that only cert
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
In any case, figuring out how many of its arguments a procedure
examines is equivalent to solving the halting problem, alas.
um, how do you figure its the same as the halting problem? to me it
clearly isnt. min arg counts are trivial
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
unless the procedure accepts unlimited arguments (explicitly or implicitly),
it should be possible to trace how many args are absorbed.
Consider this:
(define (foo . rest) (if (= 1 (random 1)) (car rest) #f)
in this case, 0. this
somewhat confusing. i dislike srfi-71.
i take the number of srfi's relating to binding (values ...) clauses in
different ways as evidence of its confusing and unnecessary nature. :)
-elf
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Scripsi:
See SRFI 8, which Chicken implements and whi
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
i take the number of srfi's relating to binding (values ...) clauses in
different ways as evidence of its confusing and unnecessary nature. :)
Whereas I think of TMTOWTDI as one of Scheme's virtues. Anyhow, we've
i
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
(define (foo . rest) (if (= 1 (random 1)) (car rest) #f)
in this case, 0. this entire expression should have been removed by the
compiler and replaced by #f, though.
Okay, make it (random 2) then, smartass.
sure, min 0, max 1
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
they'll all be call-with-values on the inside, or the equivalent thereof.
Almost. When you have one of these restricted macros, you can be quite
sure that the producer and consumer lambdas don't escape the construct.
That allo
ntation is probably
as minimal as would be sane, without putting in a hell of a lot of thought.
-elf
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Tobia Conforto wrote:
From the other thread
Elf wrote:
John Cowan wrote:
It also occurs to me that rec and let-values and all need not expand into
call-values--that&
.
if you want an only-single-mutex case, define the mutex (lets call it mtx)
and then :
(define-macro (protect-section . body)
`(let ((retval (begin
(mutex-lock! mtx #f #f)
,@body)))
(mutex-unlock! mtx)
retval))
should work.
-elf
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 12:30 PM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
im pretty sure you need mutexes. its pretty easy though...
Are you saying this because you know (critical-section) behaviour is no
longer available in the Chicken runtime?
yes, im aw
i thought disable-interrupts was deprecated as well...
-elf
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Kon Lovett wrote:
Hi,
You can just put your "critical section" code, all of it - no call-outs to
non-core Chicken, in a file w/ '(declare (disable-interrupts))'. The
requirement not to call
.
that said, threads are still a nightmare :) to get around the spaghetti-ing
and other nastinesses required several solid days of work, helper macros,
and very clearly defined areas. not fun at all.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users
f and this was
the only solution that worked for this problem domain.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
felix fixed it already, it appears. :)
-elf
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Elf wrote:
my fault. it should include the posix egg. ill fix it straightaway. i
added
signal handling to readline so that control-c and control-d were handled
properly.
-elf
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Andre Kuehne wrote
my fault. it should include the posix egg. ill fix it straightaway. i added
signal handling to readline so that control-c and control-d were handled
properly.
-elf
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Andre Kuehne wrote:
hey guys
can someone help me with this readline problem?
csi -n
CHICKEN
count me in for sure!
-elf
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Peter Bex wrote:
Hello everyone,
In light of the recent announcement by Felix and some people's concerns that
the project may get into a bit of a slump with a lack of a single Benevolent
Dictator, I decided that it would be a good id
remember what peace there
may be in writing code that needs no other documentation.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
lines might not be a bad idea.
theres a style guide on schemers.org wiki somewhere, that i happen to
disagree with on most points :)
-elf
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 2:12 PM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and given that there will be an influx of peopl
and given that there will be an influx of people working on lots of stuff...
what do people think about setting some style/indent rules/suggestions for
code?
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org
date, c) reduce duplication of
effort, and d) reduce the learning curve. this is NOT a replacement for the
wiki, however; certain things can and SHOULD be wikiised.
a full (semi)formal specification will follow, hopefully later tonight. the
specification is intended as an rfc, not as an elf
primitives
would be useful and what sorts of constraints to impose.
-elf
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
I don't understand why is everyone trying to come up with the Mother
of all Documentation Systems all the time. For the time being, can't
we just agree on having two doc
existing apps.
thoughts?
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
are
useful. i added some and took some away.
-elf
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Daishi Kato wrote:
Hi,
I'm one of the guy who messed up the http-client.
If nobody else is using other than two args,
why don't we make it much simpler (http:POST req args)
without keywords?
A user who wants to
heh, erm, well, i didnt hear from anyone for a few hours, so i already
committed the changes. apologies. theyre documented (poorly) on the wiki,
and the code should be mostly self-explanatory. theres some new methods for
modifying request-attributes too.
-elf
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Daishi
apologies. i can revert if desired. i just had a large block of code that
was breaking due to the prior implementations assumptions.
-elf
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 3:12 PM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
heh, erm, well, i didnt hear from anyone
y. i will backport it if desired (assuming here that the
changes will not be reverted due to popular demand. :) )
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
explicit specification.)
-elf
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 10:41 AM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be nice if the handling of Connection: close
is consistent with http:POST and http:GET.
how is it inconsistent? http posts should close connect afte
its in the repo at
https://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/svn/chicken-eggs/release/3/http/trunk
or should be at least.
and if youre using chicken v3, it should be avilable via regular
chicken-setup within an hour or so, i think.
-elf
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Daishi Kato wrote:
Well, of cource we can
vent gotten it cause im totally out of space on this box, in which case,
im sorry. either way, id be happy to backport it after its been worked out
what changes are desired, whether the changes should have been made, making
sure nothing breaks
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 11:05 AM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here, http:POST overwrite Connection header in req.
I guess correct behavior is of http:GET,
because with HTTP/1.1 the absence of the Connection header
means keep-alive.
a
Oh, or are you
lient
properly can be a lot of work, and it's wise to let someone else sweat
and enjoy their API.
aye, i wasnt trying to say or imply that we should be concerned with a
full-fledged 1.1 client, i just wanted to know if there are problems with
the changes i made this mornin
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 12:45 PM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
aye, i wasnt trying to say or imply that we should be concerned with a
full-fledged 1.1 client, i just wanted to know if there are problems with
the changes i made this morning :)
f agreement is reached, there wont be a delay
before it can be used.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
tation vs inline comments (which is more
trivial, but involves extra syntax). plus, we dont get any of the advantages
of having a language capable of processing abstract nested syntax trees: we're
reduced to awk.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
ib is...
-elf
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Leonardo Valeri Manera wrote:
Sorry to interrupt this rather high-level discussion on semantics and
stuffs with another of my pedestrian concerns, but when you do all
this wonderful work, could you be a little more specific as to what
license the eggs are
ed, if the protocol-version is 1.1. so as
long as i fix the above bit (not explicitly adding the close), it will work
as you expect in 1.1
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
the v3 repo should now reflect the change (no Connection:close for 1.1)
-elf
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Daishi Kato wrote:
At Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:05:45 -0800 (PST),
Elf wrote:
oh, i added a utility procedure to take care of those sorts of cases. if
youre reusing a connect, you can now do
LGPL ver is what seemed to matter from Leonadro's post, which is why
that was the issue i responded to. precisely where am i spreading
misinformation?
-elf
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Elf, do you mind not spreading incorrect information?
$ find . -wholename '*/tr
a general question for the public, as this is the second time in three days
where this has happened:
when did 'most' start meaning 'all'? i missed that communique.
-elf
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Well, it is simply not true. Source code with a non-B
says on the
webpage (or would say on plt's site, id imagine). ditteaux for awk.
for loop, v2, like it says on the wiki page.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
contribution, how anything should be, or any form of
restriction or change to the status quo?
-elf
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
One of the aspects of Chicken that appeals to me is the relative
freedom we have in contributing eggs. The lack of strict requirements
about license
of the LGPL are 'awk' and 'make' under?
They are under the GPL, not the LGPL. The versions on my machine are
under GPL Version 2, but newer versions may be under Version 3.'
erm, graham, the eggs unlimited page says lgpl for both.... a
o when one uses the
GPLed code, does it make that instance of chicken GPLed?
-elf
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
That's true, I should have said that the different licenses might
become an issue if you are distributing several eggs together. Though
I am not overly worried abo
nd whether massively expanding its role is
really such a good idea.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
yay!
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Mark Fredrickson wrote:
Good idea. Could you please add these points to the wiki page?
Added.
I also added an additional hackathon goal of improving Chicken's performance
on the PL Shootout. I know there was some noise around that in previous
weeks, but I don'
erasing accidental
pastes. :)
-elf
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Elf wrote:
id like to entitle this next rant 'why wikis are highly suboptimal for
documentation', if i may.
approximately 9 hours ago, i noticed that the documentation that i had
changed in the http wikidoc wasnt generating correc
separation
from the code. Yes, it is an additional effort, bu if you can't afford
it simply don't bother writing any documentation.
im in total agreement with you on this one :)
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
htt
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
