Network Tools

I just found this page and wanted to share it with you, it seems to have useful stuff. http://www.davecentral.com/netmon.html Regards, Jose Luis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Re: Network database

WhatsUP Gold http://www.ipswitch.com Tony Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 30/10/2000 02:05:58 PM Please respond to Tony Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Network database What type of tools

Re: Back to Back

Maybe a bad serial on one of them, I had the same issue a while ago, changed the serial with another with same config and it worked!! Jose [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 27/09/2000 06:02:08 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Weird response

The funny thing of it is that on the PC side, the ping goes through and the trace stops right on the last router. Could there be such an opposite difference on the ping and trace technique of both O.S.? (CISCO NT) Tnx.. Jose Luis -- Forwarded by Jose Luis Canillas/PY

RE: Weird response

nop!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/07/2000 03:58:00 AM To: Jose Luis Canillas/PY/ABNAMRO/NL@ABNAMRO, [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Weird response have u got any access lists in place ? Regards Atif -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Weird response

Hi all, Can someone tell me why is it that I can traceroute to a NT server on e0, and when I ping it I get time outs? Thanks in advance.. Jose Luis ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: SNA Between two different ethernet interfaces on the same router

you should configure your interfaces like this: interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 ipx network 10 bridge-group 1 ! interface Ethernet1 ip address 20.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 ipx network 20 bridge-group 1 then you go "sh bridge 1" and you should have something like: 4200..0001

RE: Working it too hard?

Thats why "I love Microsoft" Roger Navarro [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 25/05/2000 07:16:14 PM Please respond to Roger Navarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Bartlett, DS1" [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: IPX static routes

Anybody heard about floating static routes at all? Jose Luis Canillas [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 23/05/2000 01:31:50 PM Please respond to Jose Luis Canillas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cisco [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:IPX static

IPX static routes

Does anyone have any ideas about implementing static ipx routes between two different routers? Or better yet, static routes based on availability of destination interface/address (ip or ipx) Thanks, ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: