RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]

EIGRP does not recognize 0.0.0.0. Use ip default-network 192.168.1.0 instead, and then put network 192.168.1.0 under your router eigrp config. See Doyle vol. I pp. 756-758 for details. -gt Robert Cluett wrote: > > I have the following network in my home lab: > > Internet RouterEisenhower--

RE: problem with reverse telnet [7:52270]

In a similar situation I found that entering ctrl+shift+6 twice before the x worked. The sequence is ctrl+shift+6 ctrl+shift+6 x. Good luck. -gt Antonio Montana wrote: > > hi all, > > have the following scenario. > > ISP -- DSL Router -- FreeBSD -- 2511 -- CCIE Lab > > I do a telnet from th

RE: OSPF on secondary IP addresses [7:51525]

I looked at the doc for the "network area" command for 11.3, 12.0, 12.1 and 12.2. They all appear to treat secondary addresses the same way--the secondary network is not advertised if the primary network/area statement is deleted. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=

RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

I think your argument makes a lot of sense. Turpin, Mark wrote: > > I can understand your disagreement. But I hope you will > understand that > its semantics at this point. A flow by any other name is still > a flow. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51350&t=5

RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

I disagree. There are not 3 types of flows, just 3 ways to switch them. "destination-ip—The least-specific flow mask. The MLS-SE maintains one MLS entry for each destination IP address. All flows to a given destination IP address use this MLS entry. This mode is used if there are no access lists

RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

In my understanding of MLS, the first paragraph is correct. Each unidirectional sequence of packets with same source and destination and transport layer is always a separate flow. The second paragraph seems to be referring to the destination-ip flow mask, in which different flows with the same des

d/c 4000 to a/c [7:51047]

(originally posted on wanted to buy) What is the easiest and/or best way to convert a DC-powered 4000 to A/C? Is it as simple as switching power supplies? Or do they differ in a more substantial way? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51047&t=51047 -