WhatsUP Gold
http://www.ipswitch.com
Tony Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 30/10/2000 02:05:58 PM
Please respond to Tony Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Network database
What type of too
I just found this page and wanted to share it with you, it seems to have
useful stuff.
http://www.davecentral.com/netmon.html
Regards,
Jose Luis
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondiscl
Maybe a bad serial on one of them, I had the same issue a while ago,
changed the serial with another with same config and it worked!!
Jose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 27/09/2000 06:02:08 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
nop!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/07/2000 03:58:00 AM
To: Jose Luis Canillas/PY/ABNAMRO/NL@ABNAMRO, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Weird response
have u got any access lists in place ?
Regards
Atif
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
The funny thing of it is that on the PC side, the ping goes through and
the trace stops right on the last router. Could there be such an opposite
difference on the ping and trace technique of both O.S.? (CISCO & NT)
Tnx..
Jose Luis
-- Forwarded by Jose Luis Canilla
Hi all,
Can someone tell me why is it that I can traceroute to a NT server on e0,
and when I ping it I get time outs?
Thanks in advance..
Jose Luis
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
you should configure your interfaces like this:
interface Ethernet0
ip address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
ipx network 10
bridge-group 1
!
interface Ethernet1
ip address 20.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
ipx network 20
bridge-group 1
then you go "sh bridge 1" and you should have something like:
4200..0001
Thats why "I love Microsoft"
Roger Navarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 25/05/2000
07:16:14 PM
Please respond to Roger Navarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Bartlett, DS1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
Anybody heard about floating static routes at all?
Jose Luis Canillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on
23/05/2000 01:31:50 PM
Please respond to Jose Luis Canillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
S
Does anyone have any ideas about implementing static ipx routes between
two different routers? Or better yet, static routes based on availability
of destination interface/address (ip or ipx)
Thanks,
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/
10 matches
Mail list logo