""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
>
Yes.
Cisco docs call it a "hybrid" protocol because it combines some link state
features, yet also has hop count ( distance ) limitations.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
Hybrid.
""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64718&t=64707
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
EIGRP is a hybrid. It can be said that it is a distance vector routing
protocol that acts like a link state routing protocol.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Johan Bornman"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 7:11 AM
Subject: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
> Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Dist
speaking of NDA...
Dave
Reza wrote:
> Hybrid.
>
>
> ""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
I would rather have a German division in f
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
>Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though. A
hello mechanism and adjacencies does not a link state one make.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> speaking of NDA...
if this is a question directly off the CCIE written it deserves to be
revealed and publicly ridiculed :->
>
>Dave
>
> Reza wrote:
> > Hybrid.
> >
> >
> > ""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
> >Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
>
> Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though.
in what way? the hop count is pretty well hidden in the dark in
g and Winding Road
Sent: vrijdag 7 maart 2003 16:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
> >Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector p
At 03:54 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
> > >Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
> >
> > Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me t
vrijdag 7 maart 2003 16:54
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
>
>""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
> > >Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vecto
I agree completely. I think the whole "hybrid" was a marketing department
decision. I'm just glad to find out I wasn't the only one who thought this.
scott
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 03:54 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >""Peter van Oen
My netacad states:
"Technically, EIGRP is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol that
relies on features commonly associated with link-state protocols"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64733&t=64707
--
FAQ, l
The most correct answer, IMO, is that EIGRP is an enhanced distance vector
protocol. Were I taking a cisco exam though, out of your two choices I'd go
with hybrid.
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Bornman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 7:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
""John Hutchison"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My netacad states:
>
> "Technically, EIGRP is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol that
> relies on features commonly associated with link-state protocols"
>
in none of the Cisco exams I have ever taken has there ever been the m
The Cisco answer is hybrid, but that's a load of bullhocky. EIGRP is a
DV protocol. Cisco marketing likes to call it a hybrid because it has
some features that are also present in link state protocols, but they're
not specifically link state features. EIGRP is NOT a link state
protocol in any wa
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
relationships and it uses hellos, as do OSPF and IS-IS, but those have
nothing whatsoever to do with whether protocol is DV or LS. Some people
get hung up o
I seem to recall a question on the recert along those lines. I can
pretty much remeber the questions but I am not going to post it. This
post would help one come to the correct conclusion.
Dave
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> ""MADMAN"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>sp
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
> This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
> does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
> relationships and it uses hellos, as do OSPF and IS-IS, but those h
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
the REAL question is "which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching?" ;->
>
>Dave
>
> John Neiberger wrote:
> > This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
> >
At 9:12 PM + 3/7/03, MADMAN wrote:
>I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
>
>Dave
While it isn't link state, the DUAL algorithm is completely different
than that of IGRP.
>
>John Neiberger wrote:
>> This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
>
neighbors of
topology
changes the same way OSPF works. This is in contrast to RIP which
sends out
an update at specified intervals (30 secs for RIPv1) regardless of
whether a
topology change or not.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07,
: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
> This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
> does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
> relationships and it
e answer! (Well, not the one about
ARP switching. :-)
Priscilla
>
> Scott
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Neiberger"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:02 PM
> Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
>
>
> > This really isn
Cats are great. Depends what kind of sauce you use thoughJust kidding.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64861&t=64707
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
At 09:30 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>""MADMAN"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
>
>
>the REAL question is "which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching?" ;->
I'm working on a draft for ARP switching. Still str
I have an Akita dog. (pure bred) She's a year and a couple months old. She's
5 ft tall and about 100 pounds. She'll eat any cat. Dogs are superior. :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64825&t=64707
--
FAQ, list arch
""John Hutchison"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have an Akita dog. (pure bred) She's a year and a couple months old.
She's
> 5 ft tall and about 100 pounds. She'll eat any cat. Dogs are superior. :)
Dogs naturally love people; cats naturally dislike people and you have to
train the
sleep alot, and they generally leave you alone while their
doing that, right?
Just believe me, cats are better...
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:50 AM
Subject: Dogs and Cats, Re: OT Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written
Neiberger
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dogs and Cats, Re: OT Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
""John Hutchison"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have an Akita dog. (pure bred) She's a year and a couple months old.
She
29 matches
Mail list logo
