ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo you
never want the fixes and features of newer code? Just curious... Especialy
with Cisco NAT in it's infant stages...
-Patrick
>>> "David Toalson" 09/14/01 11:52AM >>>
I work at a subsidiary of a large healthcare company.
> ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo you
Me too. and if I never have to mess with the routers because they're doing
their job, then why upgrade or futz with them, especially a core router? I
love to tinker just like everyone else, but the great thing about a
rade
fixes an identifiable problem. These days, the latest IOS is not necessarily
the best IOS.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
EA Louie
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Why Cis
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> EA Louie
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
>
>
> > ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it,
essage-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> EA Louie
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
>
>
> > ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, d
nd broken code? definitely. Consistency for consistency's
sake? Well...ummm...errr...ahhhjust document it really well and upgrade
if/when you find the need.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To: "EA Louie" ;
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 5:38 PM
Subj
6 matches
Mail list logo
