RE: ACL VS Null Route [7:74267]

2003-08-26 Thread Doan Nguyen
P B has a good explanation. However black hole routing is usually done on the fly when you have a DoS attack and can't really change ACL on X routers in your network. Routing an unwanted network into Null is the quick and temporary way. However in the long run it is in good practice to use ACL

RE: ACL VS Null Route [7:74267]

2003-08-23 Thread p b
In a straight comparison, doing the NULL route is handled more efficiently on the router as its just standard L3 forwarding. If you do an ACL instead, the router has to do additional processing on the packet. If you're running something like a GSR or 7609 and the right LC where ACLs are handled

RE: ACL VS Null Route [7:74267]

2003-08-22 Thread Dom
Are they in the same address block or are they in separate blocks? Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Irwan Hadi Sent: 22 August 2003 23:29 To: [EMAIL

RE: ACL VS Null Route [7:74267]

2003-08-22 Thread Kam Chris
I believe that it is best practice to block them via an ACL inbound before they enter the router. If you route them to a Null interface the router has to further process them. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74273t=74267

Re: ACL VS Null Route [7:74267]

2003-08-22 Thread Irwan Hadi
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:48:59PM +, Dom wrote: Are they in the same address block or are they in separate blocks? separate blocks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74271t=74267 -- **Please support