No this is not correct.
You should not see an entry of 192.168.0.2 in your route table. All you
should see is a route to 192.168.0.2/30 (which means two host addresses).
It looks like you have a subnet mask conflict possibly on the other end. If
you want your configuration to be:
router 1
I am sorry, you should see a connected route of 192.168.0.0/30 in your route
table. (Not 192.168.0.2/30 or /32).
I appologize for the typo, but its been a long day!
HTH...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69638t=69612
2 matches
Mail list logo