Re: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-31 Thread Nuno Morais
ize for my (portuguese)english. Regards, Nuno Morais >From: "Buri, Heather H" >Reply-To: "Buri, Heather H" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] >Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:20:07 -0400 > >Hello. > >I don't

Re: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Peter I. Slow
"Buri, Heather H" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:20 PM Subject: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] > Hello. > > I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better > understanding of how Spanning Tree works. I am currently studying for my &

RE: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Buri, Heather H
-Original Message- From: Williamson, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:45 PM To: 'Buri, Heather H'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] Heather, Its the received port id You should find that port 1/2 is connected to the

RE: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Williamson, Paul
PROTECTED] Subject: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] Hello. I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better understanding of how Spanning Tree works. I am currently studying for my switching exam and am reviewing Spanning Tree. I have the following statement fro

question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Buri, Heather H
Hello. I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better understanding of how Spanning Tree works. I am currently studying for my switching exam and am reviewing Spanning Tree. I have the following statement from the Cisco course manual and in the case of redundant paths to t