On May 1, 2014 8:27 AM, "matt palsson" wrote:
>
If you plan to keep posting to the (or any other) list, please take the
pictures out of your signature. See also the Fedora mailing list netiquette:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Matthew: Since you share my name, and I am
Matthew: Since you share my name, and I am a huge fan of the Project, I will
be e-mailing
you directly about this subject shortly. For now, I have had a long and
exhausting day :)
But for the record, I am always happy to provide input on anything. I haven't
enjoyed Fedora
as much in the
#45: need three packages added to the fedora21 cloud iamge
+-
Reporter: sdake | Owner: jzb
Type: task| Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Branc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reminder, we have an IRC meeting tomorrow at 14:00 UTC.
Please join us in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
A list of items to discuss can be found in Trac:
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/query?keywords=~meeting&status=!closed
Also, action items from la
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:03:42PM -0400, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> pile on!
> big data applications are generally scale-out, which is currently
> not easy to do w/ docker images.
Okay. I retract this one.
Maybe we'll revisit in a couple of years. :)
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project
pile on!
big data applications are generally scale-out, which is currently not
easy to do w/ docker images.
best,
matt
On 04/30/2014 12:33 PM, Julien Eid wrote:
I also am hesitant about a big-data docker image as I don't know how
much interest there is to use docker for big data applicatio
On 04/30/2014 11:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we
actually covered the specialized images.
Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then,
the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.
#15: migrate to GPT instead of old-style partitions
--+
Reporter: mattdm| Owner: janeznemanic
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: normal| Milestone: Fedora 21 (Alpha)
Compo
#14: Investigate systemd-networkd
--+
Reporter: mattdm| Owner: janeznemanic
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone: Fedora 21 (Alpha)
Component: Cloud Base Image
I also am hesitant about a big-data docker image as I don't know how much
interest there is to use docker for big data application.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
> On 2014-04-30 21:59, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> One more thing. :) And this one might be a little bit more o
Agreed, it doesn't make sense to keep 32bit images for these.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
> On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we
>> actually covered the specialized images.
>>
>> Docker
On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't
think we
actually covered the specialized images.
Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even
then,
the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.
On 2014-04-30 21:59, Matthew Miller wrote:
One more thing. :) And this one might be a little bit more out there,
but
maybe worth considering. We've proposed making a cloud image tailored
for
big data. Maybe, instead, we should produce _Docker_ images tailored
in that
way, and suggest running t
+1 for x86_64 bits only image.
+0 for docker only
Could you Cc the big data list ? I think that they should provide us better
insight about this.
Sorry for the laconic answer: i'm currently one-armed at a dev conference
on my phone.
Regards,
H.
Le 30 avr. 2014 18:00, "Matthew Miller" a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:55:05AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Just bumping this, as only two or three people have responded.
> (I am in, btw.)
Did I respond? I hope so. Sorry if not. I'm in. :)
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--
"Tepid change
One more thing. :) And this one might be a little bit more out there, but
maybe worth considering. We've proposed making a cloud image tailored for
big data. Maybe, instead, we should produce _Docker_ images tailored in that
way, and suggest running those on our Fedora Atomic host.
(Looking here a
Because the Docker registry works by accumulating everything checked in
ever, I think we probably _don't_ want to build and push new base images
(even as part of the periodic updates proposal).
Instead, I suggest that we produce one base image in koji at release time,
and have rel-eng push that, a
I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we
actually covered the specialized images.
Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then,
the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.
And I don't think it makes sense to have a 32-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just bumping this, as only two or three people have responded.
(I am in, btw.)
On 04/24/2014 11:48 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to our governance charter[1] the working group's nine
> voting members are supposed to "confirm thei
19 matches
Mail list logo
