Hi all,
I know swig support isn't all that great at the moment but was wondering if
someone happens to have a working Swig module for cmake that doesn't rebuild
every time even without the dependencies having changed.
Someone else also pointed out a problem with .i files having to be in the
curre
On 2007-12-10 05:33+0100 Christiaan Putter wrote:
Hi all,
I know swig support isn't all that great at the moment but was wondering if
someone happens to have a working Swig module for cmake that doesn't rebuild
every time even without the dependencies having changed.
I do confirm that is a pr
Quoting "Alan W. Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2007-12-10 05:33+0100 Christiaan Putter wrote:
I know swig support isn't all that great at the moment but was wondering if
someone happens to have a working Swig module for cmake that doesn't rebuild
every time even without the dependencies having
On Dec 10, 2007 7:15 AM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-12-10 05:33+0100 Christiaan Putter wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know swig support isn't all that great at the moment but was wondering if
> > someone happens to have a working Swig module for cmake that doesn't rebuild
>
On 2007-12-10 10:12+0100 Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Quoting "Alan W. Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Someone else also pointed out a problem with .i files having to be in
the
current source dir.
We have never felt constrained by that limitation (in fact I was unaware
of
it) since it is possible to
I have a modified version of the Swig module (edited before the
EXTRA_DEPS flag was present). It uses the -MM to create dependencies
and a python script to convert the file into a CMake consumable
version. The make2cmake.py file could be rewritten in cmake script (see
below). It just needs s
On 2007-12-10 17:08+0100 Tristan Carel wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 7:15 AM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-12-10 05:33+0100 Christiaan Putter wrote:
Hi all,
I know swig support isn't all that great at the moment but was wondering if
someone happens to have a working Swig module
Am Montag 10 Dezember 2007 schrieb Tristan Carel:
> On Dec 10, 2007 7:15 AM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2007-12-10 05:33+0100 Christiaan Putter wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I know swig support isn't all that great at the moment but was
> > > wondering if someone happens to
On Dec 10, 2007 8:58 PM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-12-10 17:08+0100 Tristan Carel wrote:
>
> > On Dec 10, 2007 7:15 AM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 2007-12-10 05:33+0100 Christiaan Putter wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I know swig support isn't a
Tristan, I have been slow to respond to your e-mail because it took a long
time to investigate the java problems created by your patch. Details,
below.
On 2007-12-11 10:59+0100 Tristan Carel wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 8:58 PM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tristan, since you do not enc
On Dec 12, 2007 12:33 AM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tristan, I have been slow to respond to your e-mail because it took a long
> time to investigate the java problems created by your patch. Details,
> below.
>
> On 2007-12-11 10:59+0100 Tristan Carel wrote:
>
> > On Dec 10, 2007 8
On 2007-12-12 17:17+0100 Tristan Carel wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 12:33 AM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Tristan, if you decide to create a patch for UseSwig.cmake that does all
that for the java case, I would be happy to test it. However, if it is
possible to solve the original
12 matches
Mail list logo
