On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:31 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 05:32 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I suggest linking to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/mirror.cgi#nightly
but
I guess that's your intention ;-)
Yes, but at that point we'll have to re-build the site once ag
Diana Shannon wrote:
2. Updating the live site repository is time consuming, at least for me,
on a slow dial-up connection (I live in a rural area of the US with no
broadband option). The api docs directory is the time killer here. I
spent eight hours, one night, simply performing a cvs update
"Andrew Savory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Diana Shannon wrote:
>
>> 1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches with
>> their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the
>> branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Diana Shannon wrote:
> 1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches with
> their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the
> branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release branch,
> which is what is used to generate the web
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 07:31:10AM -0500, Diana Shannon wrote:
> 3. I was really excited about Forrest transition, thinking the
> automation would save me all of the above time which I could devote to
> docs content. Unfortunately:
> - only a few committers participated in the trial run, so it s
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 05:32 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I suggest linking to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/mirror.cgi#nightly
but
I guess that's your intention ;-)
Yes, but at that point we'll have to re-build the site once again...
Ok, we shouldn't be so limited in rebuilding the site as
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ok, it's working here as well, but shouldn't the links go
> to cocoon-2.1?
Good question ... I would link to
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/mirror.cgi#nightly but this would need a
rebuild of the complete site (as Pier pointed out).
But maybe th
Ok, it's working here as well, but shouldn't the links go
to cocoon-2.1?
Carsten
> -Original Message-
> From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Snapshot links at Cocoon website
> That is the only occurrence of the word "xml-cocoon2" on the
> server, all other problems are client-cache related...
I checked it again and now the link is correct. Probably a proxy server
issue because client caching is turned off in all my browsers.
Reinhard
On 11/3/03 7:32, "Reinhard Pötz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> On 10/3/03 7:42, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> b) Let's get the nightly build working asap
>>
>> Carsten, are you talking about the nightly builds (GUMP) or
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 10/3/03 7:42, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > b) Let's get the nightly build working asap
>
> Carsten, are you talking about the nightly builds (GUMP) or
> the nightly CVS snapshots???
>
> Because if the latter, I was
11 matches
Mail list logo