Oh dear $deity:
Given the impossibility of elevating one personal preference to
universal satisfaction, would someone please step up and develop an
extension to the mailing list preference settings so that each
individual subscriber can set the reply-to behaviour to match their own
desired
It's slow but you should be able to change your settings here, once
you have a password:
http://listserv.nd.edu/
It's actually been too slow once I get to a list for me to confirm.
Eby
On 4/2/07, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh dear $deity:
Given the impossibility of elevating one
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Dan Scott wrote:
Oh dear $deity:
Given the impossibility of elevating one personal preference to
universal satisfaction, would someone please step up and develop an
extension to the mailing list preference settings so that each
individual subscriber can set the reply-to
On Mar 30, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Daniel Chudnov wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote:
Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there
you go.
/me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list.
-1 - replies should go to lists. :) i know, i know, its a
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote:
Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there you go.
/me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list.
/me votes to drop this list in Google Groups...
-n
On Mar 30, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
turning_off_reply-to_munging_on_this_list--
--
Eric List Owner Morgan
It's not a charged issue, it's simply a harmful but entirely
unnecessary practice. For a much more eloquent explanation, see for
example
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Besides, not all email clients have a reply-to-sender feature (mine -
Apple Mail - for example doesn't), but
-0
There are strong religious arguments on both sides of this issue...and
they are both equally boring.
//Ed
@listserv.nd.edu CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu
Sent: Fri Mar 30 12:36:44 2007
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource
Access Management Services)
-0
There are strong religious arguments on both sides of this issue...and
they are both equally boring.
//Ed
did this list turn into web4lib?
*snarky off*
-- jaf
- Original Message -
From: Code for Libraries CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu
To: CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu
Sent: Fri Mar 30 12:36:44 2007
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource
10 matches
Mail list logo