On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:19:34 Paul A. Lambert wrote:
> compatible this group is at least in philosophy. The
> participation is closed, the forum allows patented code (as long as
> the license is non-discriminatory). Even with these issues, I'd
> still be very interested in seeing what th
.org/downloads/legal/LiPSInternalPolicay.pdf
To: community
Subject: standard API for linux phones?
the register has a piece about a draft of a standard API for linux
phones, concerning basics such as interaction with the address book,
texting, ui and voice-calling. future revi
tside.
Cheers,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Paulson
Sent: Monday, 11 June 2007 7:16 PM
To: community
Subject: standard API for linux phones?
the register has a piece about a draft of a sta
Tim Newsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From what I read, the LIPS group is creating an 'open' standard. The
> impression I got from that was the other phone standards group was
> closed' whatever that means.
It just struck me that the phone book contact info is pretty close to
what one wants f
y, 11 June 2007 7:16 PM
To: community
Subject: standard API for linux phones?
the register has a piece about a draft of a standard API for linux
phones, concerning basics such as interaction with the address book,
texting, ui and voice-calling. future revisons to incre
n Paulson
> Sent: Monday, 11 June 2007 7:16 PM
> To: community
> Subject: standard API for linux phones?
>
> the register has a piece about a draft of a standard API for linux
> phones, concerning basics such as interaction with the address book,
> texting, ui and voice-callin
the register has a piece about a draft of a standard API for linux
phones, concerning basics such as interaction with the address book,
texting, ui and voice-calling. future revisons to increase the
coverage
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/11/lips_mobile_linux/
and from TFA
http
7 matches
Mail list logo
