Looks like there's no problem with going ahead with this. The ticket
is CONNECTORS-459, and I've created a corresponding branch to work on
the ticket.
Karl
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Erlend Garåsen wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Erlend
>
>
> On 11.04.12 02.39, Karl Wright wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Whe
+1
Erlend
On 11.04.12 02.39, Karl Wright wrote:
Folks,
When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we
are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community
whether everyone thinks we should
+1 from me!
Piergiorgio
Il giorno 11 aprile 2012 02:39, Karl Wright ha scritto:
> Folks,
>
> When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
> binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we
> are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the com
big +1.
Tommaso
2012/4/11 Karl Wright
> Folks,
>
> When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
> binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we
> are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community
> whether everyone thinks we should
Folks,
When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we
are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community
whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
next release. The
