[RESULT][VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-16 Thread Karl Wright
Karl Wright wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our >> binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we >> are still using jdk 1.5.  I'd like to get a sense from the community >

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-11 Thread Erlend Garåsen
ryone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our next release. The "pros" of such a move include allowing us to upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7 components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time identify any obvious "cons"

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-11 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
d like to get a sense from the community > whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our > next release. The "pros" of such a move include allowing us to > upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7 > components, and off-the-shelf

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-11 Thread Tommaso Teofili
whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our > next release. The "pros" of such a move include allowing us to > upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7 > components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time >

[VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-10 Thread Karl Wright
Folks, When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in o

[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-418) Re-examine the call to the non-published method on the next release of OpenCMIS

2012-02-29 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Created) (JIRA)
Re-examine the call to the non-published method on the next release of OpenCMIS --- Key: CONNECTORS-418 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-418 Project

Re: Next release?

2011-03-02 Thread Karl Wright
I've set the next release to be 0.2, with a tentative target date of April 15. Given the delays inherent in the incubator release process, we probably need to wrap up this release by March 21st or so, to hit that deadline. If anyone has anything that's high priority they'd like

Re: Next release?

2011-03-01 Thread Karl Wright
I've been pulling users in to extract contributions from them as best I can. This has generally been effective; success rate is about 3 out of 4. But it's a "pull" process, from people who don't usually contribute to open source. Karl On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > 0

Re: Next release?

2011-03-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
0.2 makes sense. I think we need to figure out how to attract more contribution. It may have been a mistake to have separate user and dev lists at this point in the game. We need users to also be contributors. -Grant On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > A lot of fairly critic

Next release?

2011-02-20 Thread Karl Wright
A lot of fairly critical fixes and changes have already taken place since ManifoldCF 0.1 went out. When do you think we should try to release ManifoldCF 0.2? Or, do you think a 0.1.1 release would be the right approach? Karl