Karl Wright wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
>> binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we
>> are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community
>
ryone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
next release. The "pros" of such a move include allowing us to
upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7
components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time
identify any obvious "cons"
d like to get a sense from the community
> whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
> next release. The "pros" of such a move include allowing us to
> upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7
> components, and off-the-shelf
whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
> next release. The "pros" of such a move include allowing us to
> upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7
> components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time
>
Folks,
When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we
are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community
whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in o
Re-examine the call to the non-published method on the next release of OpenCMIS
---
Key: CONNECTORS-418
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-418
Project
I've set the next release to be 0.2, with a tentative target date of
April 15. Given the delays inherent in the incubator release process,
we probably need to wrap up this release by March 21st or so, to hit
that deadline.
If anyone has anything that's high priority they'd like
I've been pulling users in to extract contributions from them as best
I can. This has generally been effective; success rate is about 3 out
of 4. But it's a "pull" process, from people who don't usually
contribute to open source.
Karl
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> 0
0.2 makes sense.
I think we need to figure out how to attract more contribution. It may have
been a mistake to have separate user and dev lists at this point in the game.
We need users to also be contributors.
-Grant
On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> A lot of fairly critic
A lot of fairly critical fixes and changes have already taken place
since ManifoldCF 0.1 went out. When do you think we should try to
release ManifoldCF 0.2? Or, do you think a 0.1.1 release would be the
right approach?
Karl
10 matches
Mail list logo