[Cooker] TUI version of MandrakeUpdate?

Howdy, I exclusively run mandrake on all of my servers (and workstations for that matter) for a couple of different reasons, but most of all for the reiserfs support during install. There are a couple of things that do worry me. One is that there is no "server" option during install. It's rea

[Cooker] Mandrake rpmlint errors

Hi. There are alot of warnings and some errors in Mandrake packages after "rpmlint -a" command. Does mandrake trying to fix there own packages? -- 1:45am up 36 days, 14:42, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\

[Cooker] Evolution - print preview error

Double click in message->File->Print Preview Empty page with error "Connot allocate default for for printing" -- 12:29am up 36 days, 13:25, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\ \_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECT

[Cooker] evolution deps

GConf aspell aspell-sv bonobo bonobo-conf bug-buddy evolution gdk-pixbuf ^^^? -- 11:51pm up 36 days, 12:48, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\ \_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

[Cooker] A nice review on Mandrake 8.1

You may find it here: http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=604263 sk

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 13:20, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [...] > > > > > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get > > > > installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go > > > > back and find devel pac

[Cooker] [RPM] pan-0.11.0.91-1mdk.i686.rpm

Hello, I packaged and uploaded to /incoming the latest release of pan. both src.rpm and i686.rpm are available on my web site: http://pages.infinit.net/boulette/ Denis ___ Denis Pelletier Étudiant au doctorat sciences économiques, Université de Montré

[Cooker] A new urpmi version a new thread :)

Hello, No this is not a complaint this is a suggestion. installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/libgphoto2-2.0-0.beta1.3mdk.i586.rpm /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/libusb0.1-0.1.3b-2mdk.i586.rpm /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/modutils-2.4.12-1mdk.i586.rpm /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/gphoto2-2.0-0.beta1.3mdk.i586.rpm /var/cach

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get > > > installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back > > > and find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a piece of > > > code to build. > >

[Cooker] FW: Request bugzilla bug-creation access

Forwarding a reports that's bounced around many corners of the mandrake online presence. I'm not subscribed to this cooker list, so if you reply, pleaser make sure to include me on the reply, thanks. C -- Craig's PGP Key Get PGP, use it. -O

[Cooker] Re: [expert] Upgrade from 7.2 to 8.1

if you want to upgrade X programs, why not use rpmdrake to do it? it would check the dependencies of various rpm package. I guess it works. But I never tried. :) Good luck, /Jun On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 04:08:55PM -0700, D. R. Evans wrote: :The responses in this thread so far have not been encour

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] tux-2.1.0-1mdk

Thierry Vignaud wrote: >[Contrib-RPM] > >--=-=-= >Name: tux Relocations: (not relocateable) >Version : 2.1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Hmm. What about the tux ftp server? Yes, it exists. See speakeasy.rpmfind.net Regards.

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 04:38, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Some things I would like to see in the installer... > > > > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get > > installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have

Re: [Cooker] Evolution 0.99.2-1mdk IMAP problems?

On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 06:42, Neal Pitts wrote: > Has anyone else experienced IMAP problems with the latest Evolution > package in cooker? Nope. Not 100% Cooker, though. Started out 8.0, was 100% Cooker until libpng3 came along, then I decided to sit out a while until it was more stable. Everythi

Re: [Cooker] Today's cooker

Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > DrakX v1.599 Expert upgrade from hd.img still impossible: > Same as 9 and 12 November: > segmentation fault: seems like memory is missing as the install crashes. why is this happening? (sorry if you already told us..) any information would be liked.

Re: [Cooker] nautilus-1.0.6 build problems; patches enclosed

* Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21/11/2001 01:26]: > And since Nautilus 1.0.6 package is intented to be used on cooker only > (and not on 8.1 system), there is no point to add this conflict ! Now we're a bit away from the original topic, but I think it would be nice if, as far as possible,

[Cooker] Today's cooker

DrakX v1.599 Expert upgrade from hd.img still impossible: Same as 9 and 12 November: segmentation fault: seems like memory is missing as the install crashes. DrakX v1.599 Recommended upgrade from hd.img... * bad package sawfish-themer-1.0.1-1mdk.i586 unable to be installed - (not in rep

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postgresql-7.1.3-4mdk

Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > Ainsi parlait Christian Belisle : > [..] > > * Mon Nov 19 2001 Christian Belisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7.1.3-4mdk > > > > - Fix doc location (Guillaume Rousse) > > - Remove doc source (Guillaume Rousse) > > - Fix init script (Guillaume Rousse) > I fixed it, you broke it

[Cooker] Kernel and samba upgrades

Hi all, Is this the proper venue for listing bugs (or probable bugs) found in cooker rpms? If not, I'd appreciate a pointer to the right place. I recently attempted a kernel upgrade (to 2.4.13-8mdk), but it was unsuccessful. LILO gives me a "EBDA too big" error, which I've read about

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

Vincent Meyer wrote: >And maybe also with a kernel that will do pcmcia networking install? > >V. > >On Wednesday 21 November 2001 09:12, you wrote: > >>Yep, latest tests from chmouel showed nice performance with i810fb module. >>I'm right now integrating it in the install. Prepare to a new instal

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

Vincent Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And maybe also with a kernel that will do pcmcia networking install? we also working on that.

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

And maybe also with a kernel that will do pcmcia networking install? V. On Wednesday 21 November 2001 09:12, you wrote: > Yep, latest tests from chmouel showed nice performance with i810fb module. > I'm right now integrating it in the install. Prepare to a new install with > i810fb for today if

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: > > The strongest reason for using X for DrakX is that Intel's graphics chips > > which are in millions of new computers don't have a framebuffer. And using > > VGA16 for DrakX does not make the program justice, and resembles something > > from 1991 inste

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

On 21 Nov 2001, François Pons wrote: > > The strongest reason for using X for DrakX is that Intel's graphics chips > > which are in millions of new computers don't have a framebuffer. And using > > VGA16 for DrakX does not make the program justice, and resembles something > > from 1991 instead of

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

Mattias Dahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are there any plans on running DrakX on top of X instead of the > framebuffer? I've heard that it's tricky to get X started that early But this is currently the case, we are just limited to XF86_FBDev and XF86_VGA16. > because of the limited resour

[Cooker] X for DrakX?

Are there any plans on running DrakX on top of X instead of the framebuffer? I've heard that it's tricky to get X started that early because of the limited resources, but if Red Hat can do it, so can you! :) The strongest reason for using X for DrakX is that Intel's graphics chips which are in mi

Re: [Cooker] Evolution 0.99.2-1mdk IMAP problems?

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 01:42 pm, Neal Pitts wrote: > Has anyone else experienced IMAP problems with the latest Evolution > package in cooker? Two things happen for me. First, I never get my > message list off the server; second, the mail component crashes after > about five minutes. > > T

Re: [Cooker] napshare instead of gtk-gnutella?

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:24:37 +0100 (MET) Marcio Cordero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a short note: > as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be > gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (since it doesn't seem > to be in dev anymore) and use naps

[Cooker] Evolution 0.99.2-1mdk IMAP problems?

Has anyone else experienced IMAP problems with the latest Evolution package in cooker? Two things happen for me. First, I never get my message list off the server; second, the mail component crashes after about five minutes. This might be a Ximian problem, but I was curious if anyone else here

[Cooker] find-lang and GNOME help files - an update proposal

Hi everyone, for GNOME packages is the find-lang.sh script from the rpm-build package especially useful, because it can find all the help files of a given program. This works by adding the content of /usr/share/gnome/help/%name to the file list (tagged with lang(language) for all language subdirs.

Re: [Cooker] Evolution 1.0 RC (version 0.99) rawks

And here I thought that executable .sig thin was a joke... I thought it was a way to distribute viruses. :) On 15 Nov 2001, Ryan Little wrote: > On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 08:42, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote: > > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > > > >On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 05:44:14 +0100, Ryan Little wrote: > > >

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

le mer 21-11-2001 à 04:35, Alan a écrit : > > Some things I would like to see in the installer... > > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get > installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and > find devel packages later on when you are

Re: [Cooker] Wine 20011108 and WineX and Mandrake Gaming edition

le mer 21-11-2001 à 04:43, Chris Edwards a écrit : > There's a new wine snapshot out... > > diff:s http://www.winehq.com/News/ds20011108.txt I just wonder some things : + If Mandrake want to do a special gaming distribution, why do they not provide Loki games or demos ? A distribution with WineX

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some things I would like to see in the installer... > > 1) When you select "development" as an option, all devel packages get > installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and > find devel packages later on when you are trying to g

Re: [Cooker] napshare instead of gtk-gnutella?

1. SuSE doesn't allow to download the 6 CDs anyway, 2. If you check the last time it was updated, you'll see that gtk-gnutella wasn't updated for over one year and a half. Long development cycle :-). If you compare those two, you'll get the feeling that napshare took gtk-gnutella's source and wen

Re: [Cooker] napshare instead of gtk-gnutella?

SuSE proved that you can make a 6 CD Linux distro. Why cut Mandrake down? (Not that I want to download 6 .iso files.) Marcio Cordero wrote: >Just a short note: >as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be >gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (

[Cooker] 2.4.13-9 - Install pb's

Hi VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se) Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20011120 19:32 Hd.img install with devfs, USB on ext3. During harddisk partitioning there is no '/mnt/hd' on the mirror partition. Thus mcc fails to update the 'disks'. Fails to install: guile, guile-devel, sylpheed, xgammon and octav

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

Ainsi parlait Han : > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : > >> Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : [..] > >> > >>> * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> 0.9.4-1mdk - 0.9.4 > >> > >> Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? > > > > So

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : >> Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : [..] >>> * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> 0.9.4-1mdk - 0.9.4 >> Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? > Sorry, it was intented for Lenny only :-( For

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : > Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : > [..] > > > * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.9.4-1mdk > > > > - 0.9.4 > > Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? Sorry, it was intented for Lenny only :-( -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : [..] > * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.9.4-1mdk > > - 0.9.4 Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

Re: [Cooker] libpng-1.2.0-3mdk.src.rpm

Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can we get a taskforce going to identify & fix the packages affected by the > %makeinstall change? The number of packages that aren't rebuilding properly is > mounting... finally we keep %makeinstall as previous and the "make install DESTDIR=.."

Re: [Cooker] apt vs. urpmi

Michael Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I have just recently subscribed to this list because of my concious decision > to user the mandrake cooker on a daily basis. i have tried to get > MandrakeUpdate/rpmdrake to work but I ran into problems with proxies even > though I had i

Re: REPOST: RE: [Cooker] installkernel: AUTOREMOVE does not work

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is a bug either in installkernel or RPM packaging. installkernel -R > is called in kernel posuninstall script; at this moment > /sbin/kernel-`uname -r` is already deleted. /usr/share/loader/lilo calls > do_check() that checks existence of /boot/ke

Re: [Cooker] Did anyone get a gcc 2.95.x working on Cooker

onsdagen den 21 november 2001 06.33 Peter Ruskin wrote: > On Tuesday 20 Nov 2001 13:38, Oden Eriksson wrote: > > måndagen den 19 november 2001 18.27 Oden Eriksson wrote: > > > måndagen den 19 november 2001 17.55 Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > > > There was some talk in the last week or two about a mu

Re: [Cooker] python 2.2 (beta2) & Co

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 00:05, you wrote: > thankx for python... :) de rien

Re: [Cooker] nautilus-1.0.6 build problems; patches enclosed

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:18:45 +0100, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Ryan T. Sammartino wrote: > >> - if you have libxml2-devel < 2.4.10, then your libxml header files are >> in /usr/include/libxml. This confuses Nautilus, since it does -I >> /usr/include *before* /usr/include/g

Re: [Cooker] apt vs. urpmi

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Michael Golden wrote: > I went looking for alternatives and I > found the rpm enabled version of apt aparently from the Mandrake Cooker on > rpmfind.net although I don't see it in the recent Mandrake cooker. apt is in contrib. seb

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-lib-0.9.4-1mdk

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 09:30 am, Lenny Cartier wrote: > [Contrib-RPM] > > --=-=-= > Name: xine-lib Relocations: (not relocateable) > - 0.9.4 YES

[Cooker] apt vs. urpmi

Hi, I have just recently subscribed to this list because of my concious decision to user the mandrake cooker on a daily basis. i have tried to get MandrakeUpdate/rpmdrake to work but I ran into problems with proxies even though I had it configured properly so I went looking for alternat