On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:24:37 +0100 (MET) Marcio Cordero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a short note: > as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be > gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (since it doesn't seem > to be in dev anymore) and use napshare instead? Yes, I agree. But it is contrib, so it needs someone to build a src.rpm of napshare. Then that can have an Obsoletes option for gtk-gnutella. -- Marcel Pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux 2.4.13-8mdksmp, up 2 days 23:23
