There will always be a cooker --- changing the name of a mailing list
is just way too much bother.
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Telecom Services : Internet Consulting : http://www.teledyn.com
Linux/GNU Education Group: http://www.egroups.c
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Alwyn Schoeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is this just a name change? If so WHY?
>
> not just a name change, a complete rebuild and a roughly tested tree.
>
> --Chmouel
Ok, but will cooker stay where it is on the mirrors?
--
~~
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Florent Villard wrote:
> > > Oxygen is 2.2 based, 2.3 are development kernels and should not be used
> > > in production environment, however you are free, AT YOUR OWN RISKS,
> > > to install the hackkernel packages which provides development version of
> > > the linux kern
On 22 Dec 1999, Vandoorselaere Yoann wrote:
> Florent Villard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Will Oxygen be 2.3 or 2.2 based?
> >
> > Oxygen is 2.2 based, 2.3 are development kernels and should not be used
> > in production environment, however you are free, AT YOUR OWN RISKS,
> > to ins
Florent Villard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Oxygen is 2.2 based, 2.3 are development kernels and should not be used
> > > in production environment, however you are free, AT YOUR OWN RISKS,
> > > to install the hackkernel packages which provides development version of
> > > the linux kernel
> > Oxygen is 2.2 based, 2.3 are development kernels and should not be used
> > in production environment, however you are free, AT YOUR OWN RISKS,
> > to install the hackkernel packages which provides development version of
> > the linux kernel.
> >
> On what version is actually based hackkernel
On 22 Dec 1999, Vandoorselaere Yoann wrote:
> Florent Villard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Will Oxygen be 2.3 or 2.2 based?
> >
> > Oxygen is 2.2 based, 2.3 are development kernels and should not be used
> > in production environment, however you are free, AT YOUR OWN RISKS,
> > to insta
Florent Villard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Will Oxygen be 2.3 or 2.2 based?
>
> Oxygen is 2.2 based, 2.3 are development kernels and should not be used
> in production environment, however you are free, AT YOUR OWN RISKS,
> to install the hackkernel packages which provides development versi
> Will Oxygen be 2.3 or 2.2 based?
Oxygen is 2.2 based, 2.3 are development kernels and should not be used
in production environment, however you are free, AT YOUR OWN RISKS,
to install the hackkernel packages which provides development version of
the linux kernel.
--
Warly
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
> Is this just a name change? If so WHY?
It's a massive syncronisation of everything. Which differs in general from
cooker in that this is _supposed_ to work. It also includes all the i18n
summarys descriptions, and i assume updated docs. It has been f
Is this just a name change? If so WHY?
Pixel wrote:
> mandrake-devel is currently being replaced by oxygen on the mirror
> so be prepared for a big download ;-)
>
> more information will come soon...
>
> cu Pixel.
--
~~
Alwyn Schoeman
Systems Engineer
Prism Secure Solutions
Pixel wrote:
> mandrake-devel is currently being replaced by oxygen on the mirror
> so be prepared for a big download ;-)
>
> more information will come soon...
>
> cu Pixel.
Will Oxygen be 2.3 or 2.2 based?
Keith
- Original Message -
From: Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 10:28 PM
Subject: [Cooker] 7.0beta - oxygen
> mandrake-devel is currently being replaced by oxygen on the mirror
> so be prepared for a big download ;-)
>
mandrake-devel is currently being replaced by oxygen on the mirror
so be prepared for a big download ;-)
more information will come soon...
cu Pixel.
14 matches
Mail list logo
