RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-06 Thread kallador
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: winmodem "Riyad Kalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How are you using a win modem? I thought I remmebr reading somewhere int he > kernel that "Winmodem Support: NEVER" or something to that extent. this is because: . it needs

Re: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-06 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Riyad Kalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How are you using a win modem? I thought I remmebr reading somewhere int he > kernel that "Winmodem Support: NEVER" or something to that extent. this is because: . it needs a driver. at present time these manufacturers do not write drivers for Linux

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Christopher Molnar
a Winmodem!! > > -Original Message- > From: Geoffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem > > > > > > > > > I am also experiencing problems with a Lucent Winmodem a

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Greg Drake
I read the Howto, and followed the steps. Like I said, it didn't work, so it's looking like it's still NEVER. -Original Message- From: Riyad Kalla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem Ho

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Greg Drake
Unfortunately, it came with the computer I bought. I'm building a new one now, though - without a Winmodem!! -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem > >

Re: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: "Geoffrey Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 12:16 PM Subject: RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem > > > buy a real modem instead of a microsoft-only / proprietary only modem :) > >

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Francis GALIEGUE
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Icebreaker wrote: > > I need to point out that even though 2.2.15-0.2mdk is a prekernel, my > winmodem > works fine with it. It stopped working around 2.2.15-0.24mdk, so > something was > either removed or changed. All I want to know is what was > changed/removed so that

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Geoffrey Lee
ght be able to make it work. buy a real modem instead of a microsoft-only / proprietary only modem :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > On 6/2/00,

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Icebreaker
. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 6/2/00, 9:24:47 AM, "Riyad Kalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem: > How are you using a win mod

Re: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: "Riyad Kalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 10:24 AM Subject: RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem > How are you using a win modem? I thought I remmebr reading somewhere int he > kernel that

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Geoffrey Lee
> > > I am also experiencing problems with a Lucent Winmodem and 2.2.15. When I > attempt to dial, it says there is no dial tone, yet it initializes fine. what you get for using some no-source-code-proprietary crap :(

RE: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Riyad Kalla
00 7:12 AM To: Barry@Klein; Barry Klein Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: winmodem I am also experiencing problems with a Lucent Winmodem and 2.2.15. When I attempt to dial, it says there is no dial tone, yet it initializes fine. - Original Message - From: Francis GALIEG

Re: [Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Greg Drake
]> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 12:13 PM Subject: [Cooker] Re: winmodem > On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Barry Klein wrote: > > > > > winmodems, whatever they may be: they cannot be supported and will > > probably never be. > > > > You should have had many replies to th

[Cooker] Re: winmodem

2000-06-02 Thread Francis GALIEGUE
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Barry Klein wrote: > > winmodems, whatever they may be: they cannot be supported and will > probably never be. > > You should have had many replies to this comment by now, however, I am > going to add mine. > > I have successfully used a Lucent 'winmodem' with Mandrake 7 (a