On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 11.59, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > > fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon.
> >
> > Ok, cool!
> >
> > > > 2. "Authorization Requests" hangs licq. Also I never get any
> > > > notifications that people sends these to me.
> > >
> > > Let me check that.
> >
> > I may
> > fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon.
>
> Ok, cool!
>
> > > 2. "Authorization Requests" hangs licq. Also I never get any
> > > notifications that people sends these to me.
> >
> > Let me check that.
>
> I may get notifications if I examine the "network window", I didn't check
> that.
Y
On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 10.26, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint.
> > I have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
> >
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I
> have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
> online when started.
>
Probably temporary login problems but I see t
Update user/all users hangs Licq.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 8 hours 41 minutes
| cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan
Hi,
1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I
have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
online when started.
2. "Authorization Requests" hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications
that people sends these to me.
--
-=-=-=-=-
> > That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal support that
> > we have.
>
> Ok, got it.
>
> I have done some small test here against several buddies of mine, and direct
> messages do not work at all. I guess it's because one, or both parts is
> behind forewalls.
>
> Is there
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 23.47, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems "licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk" do not propagate itself as v8...
> >
> > 16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
> > v1.0.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems "licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk" do not propagate itself as v8...
>
> 16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
> v1.0.4/SSL].
>
That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal
Hi,
It seems "licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk" do not propagate itself as v8...
16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
v1.0.4/SSL].
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake
>
> > (1) verify for the cooker version
> licq-1.0.4-0.5mdk.i586.rpm
>
> > (2) verify for the v8 version, if it's reproduceable, give me an an exact
> > test case, exactly as you type it (the aliases that you send to you can
> > subsitute something else, those shouldn't be too important.)
> licq
On Monday 26 November 2001 05:37, you wrote:
> Strange. Are you sure? All protocol stuff should be done within the Licq
> daemon, not the plugins.
OK, my bad. Reload V8, and console is working. Don't know what the
problem was last night
> > - URL sending still crashes client, otherwise
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:59:42AM -0600, J.P. Pasnak wrote:
> On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote:
> > These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one
> > is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are
> > several core issues:
> >
> >
On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote:
> These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one
> is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are
> several core issues:
>
> - interaction with the server
> - interaction with other clients
> - sta
Es schrieb Geoffrey Lee:
> These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8
> one is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that,
> there are several core issues:
>
> - interaction with the server
Since I use your RPMs I can communicate again via t
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > > Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server"
> > > don't work through my Li
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server"
> > don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
>
> I think that there are still some direct connecti
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server" don't
> work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
>
I think that there are still some direct connection issues with Licq.
Unfortunately. :-(
- G.
On Sundayen den 25 November 2001 19.58, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> > Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server"
> > don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
>
> you open the right port ( 5190 ) ?
Everything is open LAN
le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
> Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server" don't
> work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
you open the right port ( 5190 ) ?
--
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
-
C'est dans la marine qu'il y a le plus
Direct messaging to "icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server" don't
work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current u
21 matches
Mail list logo
