On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 01:31:51PM -0500, neognomic wrote:
I agree that preciseness would be an advantage, but lack thereof IS the
nature of software releases.
[ etc. ]
I agree.
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
Sichere Mail? Mail an
Below is copy of email Mr. Dawes was kind enough to send me.
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:26:27AM -0500, I wrote:
Hello,
The rumor is that xFree4.0.2 will be released in a few days. Is that why
this page
That rumour is incorrect.
http://www.xfree86.org/releaseplans.html#40 still contains
"
neognomic wrote:
Below is copy of email Mr. Dawes was kind enough to send me.
That was our plan, but it didn't work out that way. I've changed that
page to say "sometime in late 2000."
A little more precision would be nice. (-:
Does Mr Dawes have even a definite month in mind? Can you ask,
===
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
|Behalf Of Leon Brooks
|Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 07:14
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [Cooker] UPDATE: XFree86 4.0.2 NOT 2b released anytime soon
|
|
|neognomic wrote:
| Below is
Below is copy of email Mr. Dawes was kind enough to send me.
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:26:27AM -0500, I wrote:
Hello,
The rumor is that xFree4.0.2 will be released in a few days. Is that why
this page
That rumour is incorrect.
http://www.xfree86.org/releaseplans.html#40 still contains
"