On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 01:31:51PM -0500, neognomic wrote:
> I agree that preciseness would be an advantage, but lack thereof IS the
> nature of software releases.
[ etc. ]
I agree.
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
Sichere Mail? Mail a
sure they did.
|>-Original Message-
|>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
|>Behalf Of Leon Brooks
|>Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 07:14
|>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>Subject: Re: [Cooker] UPDATE: XFree86 4.0.2 NOT 2b r
neognomic wrote:
> Below is copy of email Mr. Dawes was kind enough to send me.
>> That was our plan, but it didn't work out that way. I've changed that
>> page to say "sometime in late 2000."
A little more precision would be nice. (-:
Does Mr Dawes have even a definite month in mind? Can you
Below is copy of email Mr. Dawes was kind enough to send me.
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:26:27AM -0500, I wrote:
>Hello,
>
>The rumor is that xFree4.0.2 will be released in a few days. Is that why
>this page
That rumour is incorrect.
>http://www.xfree86.org/releaseplans.html#40 still contains
Below is copy of email Mr. Dawes was kind enough to send me.
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:26:27AM -0500, I wrote:
>Hello,
>
>The rumor is that xFree4.0.2 will be released in a few days. Is that why
>this page
That rumour is incorrect.
>http://www.xfree86.org/releaseplans.html#40 still contains
