[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)]
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, John Grange wrote:
> that is simply lazy that is for sure if we can keep up with them there is
> NO reason that t
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)]
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, John Grange wrote:
> that is simply lazy that is for sure if we can keep up with them there is
> NO reason that they can no
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, John Grange wrote:
> that is simply lazy that is for sure if we can keep up with them there is
> NO reason that they can not make it in the first place they are keeping up
> with how many different distribs??
i'd guess that the folks at helix are far too busy writing press r
Steve Fox wrote:
> I think simply keeping up with Helix's patches is good enough. Helix
> obviously doesn't consider Mandrake important enough (which doesn't
> surprise me as they've almost all moved over to Debian). They are too
> lazy to make multiple spec files.
>
I was under the impression t
I think simply keeping up with Helix's patches is good enough. Helix
obviously doesn't consider Mandrake important enough (which doesn't
surprise me as they've almost all moved over to Debian). They are too
lazy to make multiple spec files.
John Grange wrote:
>
> Well i guess we got our answre,
