Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint session problem with solution

2003-01-17 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: "John Danielson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Any system that has EVER had a file system with Windows or DOS on it has the >>following part structure. >> >>Part #s 1-4 can be primary. >>Part #5 is always an extended part table to hold logical drives. >>Parts 6 and up can be logicals. >> | | And

Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint session problem with solution

2003-01-17 Thread Pixel
"John Danielson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The commented line is what I had to pull to get the machine to boot past an > ext2 fsck that said it could not find a superblock when I tried to boot the > machine into Linux. > [...] > I was trying to use Diskdrake from the GUI when this happened

Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint session problem with solution

2003-01-16 Thread John Danielson, II
Pixel wrote: "John Danielson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Any system that has EVER had a file system with Windows or DOS on it has the following part structure. Part #s 1-4 can be primary. Part #5 is always an extended part table to hold logical drives. Parts 6 and up can be logicals.

Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint session problem with solution

2003-01-16 Thread Pixel
"John Danielson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any system that has EVER had a file system with Windows or DOS on it has the > following part structure. > > Part #s 1-4 can be primary. > Part #5 is always an extended part table to hold logical drives. > Parts 6 and up can be logicals. it real

Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint session problem with solution

2003-01-16 Thread Pixel
"John Danielson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Soemthing that just happened to me made me think that documenting a particular > recovery process would help many people: > > How to get your /etc/fstab file editted from a floppy boot when your > partitioning is set up to have a seperate /usr pa