On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:14:45PM +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> AFAICS, we are missing the following helpcontent wrt. 1.0.3 we shipped:
> Spanish, Finnish, Czech. Of course, that's just help files. Besides,
> wrapper script has yet to be updated for new conf files. This should
> happen to
Paul Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:39, Buchan Milne wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
>> > Works here - we NEED this in this release if at all possible.
>>
>> I think (based on some previous mails) that Gwenole i
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:39, Buchan Milne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
> > Works here - we NEED this in this release if at all possible.
>
> I think (based on some previous mails) that Gwenole is probably working
> very hard on this, which is w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
> Works here - we NEED this in this release if at all possible.
>
I think (based on some previous mails) that Gwenole is probably working
very hard on this, which is why he's even more quiet than usual ...
cookers asking for
On Monday 25 August 2003 02:54 pm, Paul Dorman wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:25, Jan Ciger wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> > |>OO 1.1 provide several interesting features and bugfixes, better office
> > |>format compatibility and seems
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 11:27, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Austin wrote:
> > On 08/25/03 17:34:00, Buchan Milne wrote:
> >> So we have a 1.1 coming? Any chance at SDK also (or
> >> OpenOffice.org-devel package or similar)? There have been requests
> >> for cuckoo[1] (kpart embedding OO.o) on MandrakeCl
On 08/26/03 05:27:27, Buchan Milne wrote:
Whatever toolkit you are linking against should require XFree86-devel
(recently renamed to libxfree86-devel), and pull it in.
Or am I missing something?
No, there is another devel bundle called the XFree86-SDK or whatever. Most
distros don't include it, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin wrote:
>
> On 08/25/03 17:34:00, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
>> So we have a 1.1 coming? Any chance at SDK also (or OpenOffice.org-devel
>> package or similar)? There have been requests for cuckoo[1] (kpart
>> embedding OO.o) on MandrakeClub, and it l
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:44, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
> It seems that we will enter soon in feature freeze period. Maybe it's
> time to include OO 1.1RC3 and test it in order to see if we can
> provide it and there will not have pbs.
Please!
> OO 1.1 provide several interesting features and bugfixes,
Any chance at SDK also (or OpenOffice.org-devel package or similar)?
I don't think so. I have never looked into this and there are other
things left to JIT learn & fix. ;-)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:34:00PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 19:15, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
>
> > Actually, I notice that the kernel in beta2 was the old 9.1 kernel and at
sorry, I meant 2.4.21-xxx, whereas the current cooker kernel is 2.4.22-xxx,
seems like a major chan
On 08/25/03 17:34:00, Buchan Milne wrote:
So we have a 1.1 coming? Any chance at SDK also (or OpenOffice.org-devel
package or similar)? There have been requests for cuckoo[1] (kpart
embedding OO.o) on MandrakeClub, and it looks very cool (and
functoinal), but requires the SDK to build.
Hell, we don
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I agree. OOo is awsome. Much better then 1.0.x. We just need to wait
>> for localization packages to include too. Other then that it works
>> perfectly and I hope to see it soon.
>
>
> AFAICS, we are missing the fol
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 19:15, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> Actually, I notice that the kernel in beta2 was the old 9.1 kernel and at
No it wasn't.
> least mcc still reported 9.1 in the titlebar Having an updated kernel
Utterly minor; the change from 9.1 to 9.2 in drakconf title is a simple
patch
Hi,
I agree. OOo is awsome. Much better then 1.0.x. We just need to wait
for localization packages to include too. Other then that it works
perfectly and I hope to see it soon.
AFAICS, we are missing the following helpcontent wrt. 1.0.3 we shipped:
Spanish, Finnish, Czech. Of course, that's jus
I agree. OOo is awsome. Much better then 1.0.x. We just need to wait for
localization packages to include too. Other then that it works perfectly
and I hope to see it soon.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:25, Jan Ciger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> |>OO 1.1 provide several interesting features and bugfixes, better office
> |>format compatibility and seems very stable. It will be disappointed if
> |>it is not shipped with 9
On 08/25/2003 02:25:34 PM, Jan Ciger wrote:
I second this, please, package it at least for contribs. It makes huge
difference compared to the old 1.0.x version. It is marked as RC
still,
but it is rock stable and works well.
Yeah, I was reluctant to try it, but the first time I did, I almost wet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Oosthoek wrote:
|>OO 1.1 provide several interesting features and bugfixes, better office
|>format compatibility and seems very stable. It will be disappointed if
|>it is not shipped with 9.2 release.
|>
|
|
| You have my vote! :-)
I second this,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:44:30PM +, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
> It seems that we will enter soon in feature freeze period. Maybe it's
> time to include OO 1.1RC3 and test it in order to see if we can provide
> it and there will not have pbs.
> OO 1.1 provide several interesting features and bugf
20 matches
Mail list logo
