On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Serguei Trouchelle wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
>
>> I have ranted in many other forums that dotted decimal versions should
>> always be expressed in "normal" form -- meaning a leading v and at
>> least 3 parts (v2.17.1 or v2.6.0) to avoid confusion.
>
> I strongly
Dear CPAN Testers,
You may or may not realize that Barbie has done a tremendous amount of
work over the years to reconcile email addresses to individual
testers.
As we move to CT 2.0, every testers will have a "Metabase profile" --
a JSON file containing identify information and a shared secret -
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 03:06:25PM -0600, Curtis Jewell wrote:
> This is a computer-generated report for Alien-SDL-1.409
> on perl 5.8.8, created by *CPAN-Reporter-1.1704.*
>
> So we have a tester who hasn't upgraded his test toolchain since January
> 2009.
>
> That's where he's getting the old w
This is a computer-generated report for Alien-SDL-1.409
on perl 5.8.8, created by *CPAN-Reporter-1.1704.*
So we have a tester who hasn't upgraded his test toolchain since January
2009.
That's where he's getting the old web site from.
Can somebody go over to his machine and... persuade him to upg
David Golden wrote:
I have ranted in many other forums that dotted decimal versions should
always be expressed in "normal" form -- meaning a leading v and at
least 3 parts (v2.17.1 or v2.6.0) to avoid confusion.
I strongly disagree.
ExtUtils::MakeMaker doesn't handle v-strings. It's documente
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:44:29PM +0200, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 wrote:
> The website on that domain is still linked to recently:
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7945702
Where are you getting cpantest.grango.org from? This an obsolete address
and shouldn't be used.
Cheers,
Barbie.
--
Birming
The website on that domain is still linked to recently:
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7945702
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
(a) What was the situation before things broke
Generally all OK - I was able to send and submit CPAN2.0 reports.
(b) What did you do that caused the break
Sometimes I would install an updated version of a module, sometimes I would
run a Smoker, sometimes I would sleep (i.e. it worked fine
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:08 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 02:41:41PM +0200, The Sidhekin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > > On 09/07/10 12:36, David Cantrell wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:48:26AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > >>>
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:08 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> 2.17.1 isn't a version *number* at all as it isn't a number. It is a
> higher *version* than 2.6.
>
> I suppose this exposes another bug: that you can compare different data
> types (in this case a number and a version) without an explicit
Nigel -- you seem have a lot of situations of "has started to give
this error". Thank you for "stress testing" things and finding odd
errors, but I need you to give me more information about:
(a) What was the situation before things broke
(b) What did you do that caused the break
(c) What kind of
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 02:41:41PM +0200, The Sidhekin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > On 09/07/10 12:36, David Cantrell wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:48:26AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> >>> Module Need Have
> >>> ! DBD::Pg
One of my Darwin machines has, this morning, started to give this error:
Can't locate object method "new" via package
"Test::Reporter::Transport::Metabase" at
/Library/Perl/5.8.1/Test/Reporter.pm line 277.
I ran "install Test::Reporter::Transport::Metabase"
with the result "Test::Reporter::T
13 matches
Mail list logo
