ecifically on that “team” do you think should get those
>>> changes in for you? To help, here is the commit log from the git repo.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://git.eclipse.org/c/tm/org.eclipse.tm.git/log/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kaloyan Raev is th
lier in this
>> chain, he has removed the dependency from the projects he works on.
>>
>>
>>
>> We really need to be crystal clear at this point what the plan is.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cross-project-i
at this point what the plan is.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
>> cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Nick Boldt
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 9:
int what the plan is.
>
>
>
> Doug.
>
>
>
> From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org>
> [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse
: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been
disabled
Strictkly speaking, the "leadership chain" can decide to add or remove
committers if the project is determined to be dysfunctional. The leadership
chain includes the PMC. They'd have to ask me to initiate t
is chain, he has removed the dependency from the projects he works on.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We really need to be crystal clear at this point what the plan is.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Doug.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
in
>> this chain, he has removed the dependency from the projects he works on.
>>
>>
>>
>> We really need to be crystal clear at this point what the plan is.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cross-project-i
-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Wim Jongman
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 6:41 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been
disabled
Hi,
RSE is a big part of the IBM main and midframe dev solutions. I can't believe
that they
loyan Raev is the only active committer and from his note earlier in
>> this chain, he has removed the dependency from the projects he works on.
>>
>>
>>
>> We really need to be crystal clear at this point what the plan is.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug.
>
what the plan is.
>
>
>
> Doug.
>
>
>
> *From:* cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Nick Boldt
> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 9:49 AM
> *To:* issues, Cross project
> *Subject:* Re:
Doug.
>
>
>
> *From:* cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Nick Boldt
> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 9:49 AM
> *To:* issues, Cross project
> *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel
, Cross project
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been
disabled
AFAIK it's out.
But if I find time to submit the changes from my/Rob's github fork as gerrit
review(s) back to the master fork on git.eclipse.org<http://git.eclipse.org>,
that team
AFAIK it's out.
But if I find time to submit the changes from my/Rob's github fork as
gerrit review(s) back to the master fork on git.eclipse.org, that team can
evaluate it, merge it, and maybe decide they want to be included for M6.
Then it'll be up to the Planning Council to approve the late add
Hi,
Sry for the delay, I re-enabled LDT removing ldt.remote feature which
depends on RSE.
So this should be ok for photon M6.
I'm a bit confuse. Will RSE be reintegrated or is it officially and
definitely not part of Photon ?
Thx,
Simon
Le 01/02/2018 à 12:22, Frederic Gurr a écrit :
Hi
FYI, I've pushed an update to DTP into the Photon.0 simrel. Too late for
M5, but it'll be there for M6.
If anyone has time to take a look at the failing DTP tests, please do. You
can throw me a gerrit request, now that DTP is gerrit-enabled.
More info about this new DTP 1.14.100-SNAPSHOT build he
Hi,
Thanks to Kaloyan, Dawid and Eugene for fixing and re-enabling the
contributions of DLTK, PDT and TCF.
The only contribution missing is LDT.
Since it's already past the +3 window, LDT will miss Photon M5.
Hopefully they can rejoin for M6.
Regards,
Fred
--
Frederic Gurr
Release Engineer
E
M
> *To:* cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> *Reply-to:* cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has
> been disabled
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Doug Schaefer
> wrote:
>
>> Does anyon
ss-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Reply-to: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been
disabled
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Doug Schaefer
mailto:dschae...@blackberry.com>> wrote:
Does anyone want these contributions t
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Doug Schaefer
wrote:
> Does anyone want these contributions to keep RSE alive?
>
I don't think the opinion of others should be used as a criterion here. The
thing is that if Nick, Rob or whoever have authored good patches, it's
still better to contribute them in
Hi,
I enabled DLTK and PDT, validation passed.
--
Dawid Pakuła
From: Kaloyan Raev
Reply: Cross project issues
Date: 31 January 2018 at 17:32:14
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been
disabled
Hi,
I removed the DLTK
ect-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Greg Watson
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 3:30 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been
disabled
The last commit was by Kaloyan Rae
The last commit was by Kaloyan Raev in April last year, so it is pretty much
inactive at this point.
Are your fixes to the code base or to the build? If the latter, then I can
probably take a look. If the former, then it might be better to take Wayne up
on his suggestion.
Regards,
Greg
> On J
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
> OK, but what happens if the project is dead, no longer being developed,
> and was kicked off the simrel train for its inactivity / failure to declare
> intent on time?
>
> I'll happily contribute the fixes, but if no one reviews them or if
> th
OK, but what happens if the project is dead, no longer being developed, and
was kicked off the simrel train for its inactivity / failure to declare
intent on time?
I'll happily contribute the fixes, but if no one reviews them or if they're
bigger than the 1000 LOC limit, we're going to have a bad
You don't need to be a committer to make a contribution. In fact, that's
the exact opposite of how it's supposed to happen.
Make the contribution.
The existing committers can then choose to nominate you as a committer to
support that contribution.
In exceptional circumstances, the PMC can declar
Yes, that's what I was suggesting. We contribute the handful of fixes in
Rob's fork back to the master repo on git.eclipse.org, build it on a HIPP,
and contribute it into Photon.0.M6.
If someone nominates me as a committer to TM/RSE, I'll make this happen.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Mickae
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
> Should we want to re-include RSE in Photon, we could do so for M6 if
> someone grants me a place to publish it & permission to do so. We've got a
> fork [1] that updates the old Oxygen-based TM/RSE build to Tycho 1.0, and
> it currently builds
Hi,
TCF is re-enabled after removing TCF/RSE integration from SimRel.
Thanks,
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Frederic Gurr [mailto:frederic.g...@eclipse-foundation.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1:13 PM
To: Cross project issues
Cc: Eugene Tarassov ; zu...@w3des.net;
sbern...@si
Should we want to re-include RSE in Photon, we could do so for M6 if
someone grants me a place to publish it & permission to do so. We've got a
fork [1] that updates the old Oxygen-based TM/RSE build to Tycho 1.0, and
it currently builds against Photon.0.M4. This could easily be moved to an
Eclipse
Hi,
I removed the DLTK integration with RSE from SimRel:
https://git.eclipse.org/r/116449/
With this change it should be possible to re-enable DLTK and PDT.
Thanks,
Kaloyan
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Frederic Gurr <
frederic.g...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As announced bef
Hi,
As announced before, the Target Management (TM) contribution has been
disabled.
Even though some code has been moved to CDT (see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=527575), there are still
two features remaining (org.eclipse.rse and org.eclipse.rse.useractions).
Since disabling th
31 matches
Mail list logo
