You should use h* elements instead of p elements for any kind of
header. You might then not need to specify any classes and it's more
semantically correct
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:21 AM, "Climis, Tim" wrote:
>> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and
>
scuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Scott Mueller
http://www.appletree.com
AppleTree - Solve the Puzzle
__
css-discuss [
al ..
> It's possible to achieve ONLY if the header has a fixed width (not fluid as
> showed in my approach).
> Regards
> Maurício
>
> -Mensagem Original-
> *De:* Scott Mueller
> *Para:* Mauricio (Maujor) Samy Silva
> *Cc:* Gunlaug Sørtun ; css-d@lists.cs
lva
>
> -----Mensagem Original- De: "Scott Mueller"
> Para: "Gunlaug Sørtun"
> Cc:
> Enviada em: domingo, 22 de março de 2009 21:38
> Assunto: Re: [css-d] 3 columns of text, but MINIMAL wrapping, possible?
>
>
>
> Hi Gunlaug, thank you for
n, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Tim Climis wrote:
> On Sunday, March 22, 2009 7:38:22 pm Scott Mueller wrote:
> > I would think this is fairly common, but I can neither find a solution or
> > figure one out :(. I just want 3 columns in my header like this (texts
> are
> > ju
Hi Gunlaug, thank you for your quick response. Sounds like I'm best off
using a table for my layout as painful as that sounds after reading 3 books
properly explaining how wrong doing so is...
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Scott Mueller wrote:
>
> The
e above possible while keeping "We are the
best" at the top of the source order?
Thanks so much for any help. This is my first CSS stylesheet, I've only
just read a few books on CSS including the excellent "Flexible Web Design
Creating Liquid and Elastic Layouts with CSS
