Hi,
On Apr 3 21:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 3 17:19, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
Based on my limited understanding of .exe.manifest files, I believe the
problem should be related to this change to Cygwin setup:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/setup/setup.exe.manifest?rev=2.4&conte
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
>> I'm looking at ppl right now. Is there any reason not to package the
>> latest version (1.0)?
>
> 0.11.x is the recommended version for GCC 4.7.
It will either have to be 0.11.2 or 1.1pre8 since the 0.12 and 1.0
series don't compile with gmp-5.1.1. I still prefer the
On 4/4/2013 9:46 PM, David Stacey wrote:
BASEURL=http://dl.dropbox.com/sh/7y1yn4whbyho9a7
wget --no-host-directories --force-directories --cut-dirs=5 \
${BASEURL}/GaHtPI0wwe/64bit/release/doxygen/doxygen-1.8.3.1-2-src.tar.bz2 \
${BASEURL}/dnd_KE3crB/64bit/release/doxygen/doxygen-1.8.3.1-2.tar.bz2
BASEURL=http://dl.dropbox.com/sh/7y1yn4whbyho9a7
wget --no-host-directories --force-directories --cut-dirs=5 \
${BASEURL}/GaHtPI0wwe/64bit/release/doxygen/doxygen-1.8.3.1-2-src.tar.bz2 \
${BASEURL}/dnd_KE3crB/64bit/release/doxygen/doxygen-1.8.3.1-2.tar.bz2 \
${BASEURL}/07f8FokqQW/64bit/release/dox
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Hi guys,
> since openssl 1.0.1 is our recent version for a while now, I'd like to
> ask those of you which still have packages linked against libopenssl098
> to update your packages to new versions linked against libopenssl100.
> The following
On Apr 4 18:02, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 30.03.2013 21:37, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> >Hi Thomas,
> >
> >On Mar 30 20:44, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> >>wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/64/mined-2012.22-0.tar.bz2
> >>wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/64/mined-2012.22-0-src.tar.bz2 #
> >>is this needed?
Am 30.03.2013 21:37, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
Hi Thomas,
On Mar 30 20:44, Thomas Wolff wrote:
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/64/mined-2012.22-0.tar.bz2
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/64/mined-2012.22-0-src.tar.bz2 #
is this needed? (identical to 32 bit source package)
Any chance you can
On Apr 4 14:05, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
>
> > it doesn't matter right now. The 64 bit test release is small, compared
> > to the 32 bit distro, and it doesn't contain all required libs yet. For
> > instance, I built the 64 bit OpenSSH version without
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> it doesn't matter right now. The 64 bit test release is small, compared
> to the 32 bit distro, and it doesn't contain all required libs yet. For
> instance, I built the 64 bit OpenSSH version without tcp_wrappers and
> without Kerberos support, s
Hi Volker,
On Apr 4 13:26, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > Peter Rosin writes:
>
> > Hi!
> > aalib is a prerequisite for the GGI packages, but the aalib maintainer
> > (hello Dr. Volker Zell) hasn't responded to my query [1] and neither
> > to the query by cgf [2], so here I am wi
> Peter Rosin writes:
> Hi!
> aalib is a prerequisite for the GGI packages, but the aalib maintainer
> (hello Dr. Volker Zell) hasn't responded to my query [1] and neither
> to the query by cgf [2], so here I am with a non-maintainer RFU...
Hi
I have been on vacation. I have
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:57:09 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> And the reroll failed to build because of the problem JonY ran into with
> java. Turns out that libjava keys off the presence of pthread_getattr_np
> (added to the DLL a few versions ago) to decide whether to invoke a couple of
> boehm-gc fu
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:23:00 +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
> > http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ppl
> > http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/cloog-ppl
>
> I'm looking at ppl right now. Is there any reaso
> Christopher Faylor writes:
> I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
> impact package maintainers.
> So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
> 1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
> 2) If no, would you be willing to ins
14 matches
Mail list logo
