On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:59:26PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
> This actually fits in with something Lessig is widely known for, his
> "technology-custom-law" trichotomy (*).
>
> (* He may call it something different...I haven't checked in a while.
I was reading some of David Friedman's articles ove
On Dec 5, 2003, at 3:53 PM, Tim May wrote:
Back to the cost issue. Prof. Lessig argues that voluntary identity
escrow systems should be "encouraged." How/ Through nattering to
people about how they ought to use a more expensive, less flexible
system which exposes them to possible danger and whic
I think Declan's got the title wrong -
Lessig's discussions that he references aren't about
ending anonymity through escrowed pseudonymity -
they're about replacing some True-Name-based or linkable
applications with pseudonymous ones. For instance,
one-use credit card numbers instead of regular nu
On Dec 5, 2003, at 5:53 PM, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
I have nothing against Lessig, but it bugs me that he's considered by
some to be one of the Great Cyberspace Thinkers when his ideas are so
easily dismissed...and were argued on both sides so many years ago.
Larry Lessig ought to read, and think d
DO NOT FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO ANY OTHER LISTS. I AM GETTING TIRED OF
SEEING CYPHERPUNKS JUST BE THE DUMPING GROUND FOR STUFF FROM OTHER
LISTS.
In almost all foreseeable cases, a system which allows identity escrow
_cost more_ than a system which does not. This is analogous to the
increased co
See also:
http://politechbot.com/pipermail/politech/2003-December/000268.html
---
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:12:16 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Larry Lessig replies to Politech over limiting anonymity [fs][priv]
---
[Why do I get the feeling that
