Re: Using time-domain reflectometry to detect tamper attempts on telecom cables

2003-03-09 Thread Thomas Shaddack
But getting the bits from under the ocean somewhere back to Fort Meade without being detected must be more interesting. Can't they hire their own fiber in the cable, splice it, and feed the preprocessed data in there? It probably is true that the right wavelength laser will penatrate

Re: Using time-domain reflectometry to detect tamper attempts on telecom cables

2003-03-09 Thread Tyler Durden
] Subject: Re: Using time-domain reflectometry to detect tamper attempts on telecom cables Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 07:39:36 +0100 (CET) But getting the bits from under the ocean somewhere back to Fort Meade without being detected must be more interesting. Can't they hire their own fiber in the cable

Using time-domain reflectometry to detect tamper attempts on telecom cables

2003-03-07 Thread Thomas Shaddack
Time to time, usually when it appears on Cryptome, I skim through the revisions of Wassenaar agreement lists of controlled technologies. It's a neat way to keep myself up to date with what technologies are available on the market and the approximate degree of security they offer. One of the

Re: Using time-domain reflectometry to detect tamper attempts on telecom cables

2003-03-07 Thread Dave Emery
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:38:56PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote: Undersea, I've heard that NSA uses splices, and that NSA has its own sub for that purpose. (And the company I used to work for did some work on undersea NSA optical projects, so I tend to believe the rumors I heard there.)

Re: Using time-domain reflectometry to detect tamper attempts on telecom cables

2003-03-07 Thread Tyler Durden
Well, I can only speak about OTDRs. Maybe it could be possible to build a dedicated TDR system intended to be connected to installed cablings, periodically test the cables by sending pulses along them and watch what returns, compare the result with long-term average, and report differences.